| Author |
OMG! I can't believe my eyes! |
jingboyx
Joined: Jul 12, 2005
Posts: 168
From: City of Seven Hills
PM |
@Xugaa
I agree with you. But the pics on the first post were all taken by the same person and all the pics of w800 seem to score better than those of k800 ones.
I had the chance to use k800 for a few weeks and quite frankly I wasnt all that impressed with it. I am not saying k800 is NO upgrade, but i feel it isnt an upgrade enough (considering its price tag). Few things I found annoying were...
1) The joystick. I was really lookin for an improvement on this since k750 joystick was crappy but was disappointed. I would ve preferred a d-pad like the one on w810 or w550.
2) The sound. The quality is simply unacceptable for a phone of such specs.
3) The menu and overall phone performance is SLOW.
4) The Earphones
Features that are real upgrades
1) The screen
2) 3G . I would ve preferred to see EDGE also. Its mainly for this reason that I am gonna get a w810.
3) The camera. I found the camera better than that of a w800 only at poor light conditions. Otherwise I didnt find much difference. Not to mention, my canon A400 digicam (3.2 MP) performs several times better than a k800 at all conditions.
4) Java platform 7. Lets us run multiple java apps simultaneously. (Although k800 has a huge heap memory, the java apps still perform slow.)
Overall, k800 didnt impress me to the level I had anticipated.
P.S. : Please excuse if my language aint perfect as English is not my mother tongue  | |
|
mcrosser
Joined: Oct 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Peru
PM |
obviously the cannon camera would be better, since it has a better sensor (CCD) compared to the K800 (CMOS); but then, some digital cameras are bad, even worse than K800.
AVAILABLE - advertise here!!  |
Xugaa
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Great Britain
PM |
Gees, am I the only one...?!
My K800...
Brilliant pictures, major camera upgrade
Fantastic screen and speed
Excellent sound quality, both ringtones and music
On that last point, my K800 absolutely owns/pwns/kills/destroys/annihlates/fubar's my Ipod Nano!
I just don't get all this negativity...
_________________
  The Only Reliable Thing About The Future Is Uncertainty
[ This Message was edited by: Xugaa on 2006-10-17 20:58 ] |
aremaboy
Joined: Nov 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Malang, Indonesia
PM |
My K800i R1ED001 is SUPER...The best in all. I have produced great pictures with it. Of course, don't compare my photos with pro's...at least they look awesome on my laptop and printable up to 5R. |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
the lens could be dirty. that's whay the pic came out like that. that happended to me with my k750.
here's an example:
|
QuickShare
Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM |
guys.. let's end this up in a great way.. both device created by the same manufacture and both has an equal camera quality that can produce great picture.. nobody print out a huge size picture and 5R can definately satisfied your eyes..and firmwares do fix the phone to the best it can.. i guess it's clear now no point to fight againts each other and if someone could just backup few step behind.. that would be great.. peace Esato 
My Flickr Site.. Flickr.comMost Popular Newbie 2006 |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
I wonder which captures the BEST image between the K750 and W800 
[addsig] |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-17 18:37:00, psychonymphe wrote:
Yes jack but you have to be a retard to interpret it that way. Bad spelling = bad memory = not too clever.
And a keybord is easier to type on that my cell's keypad.
|
|
Hmm, pretty high and mighty of you. It would also be bad of me to assume that your not sexy in physical appearance, nor very fun to hang out with, however I'm not that shallow. So for a quick moment I'd like for you to read the following quickly without trying to hard.
Quote:
| Cambridge University wrote:
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Amzanig huh? |
|
That wasnt so hard as the human mind can quickly extrapolate learned information from the above. Speaking about intelligence, just because we're all educated and can type in fairly proper grammatical structure doesnt prove ANYTHING about being clever/intelligence. I understand the word "clever" as being cunning to USE what you've learned to accomplish any goal irregardless of rules or restraints. I understand intelligence to be able to interpret an anknown object/subject/thing/situation and able to make it known, to decipher a cryptic problem/situation and manage through it successfully, to be able to start with NOTHING and have something within any kind of travel (not just physical movement). Basically ingeniuty. Examples (the invention of artificatial light beyond burning gases, magnification, harnessing & converting energy, flight, the ability to simulate gravity in space when there isn't any, etc).
When speaking about intelligence JUST solely because someone chooses or not to choose proper grammar is presumptious, and quite frankly arrogant! Please, take your school taught knowledge - remember most of what we know is LEARNT behaviour (walking eating, reading, speaking, spelling, using tools, etc either by watching, being taught, or by trial & error/hardship) - and force it down your own throat. If you want an intelligent conversation about grammar & spelling then your free to create a thread based on this, or have a GOOD read in the news for any article mentioning Rogers Communications Inc about a legal binding contract that COULD cost them 2.1 Million dollars based on ..... get this .... a SECOND COMMA in a sentence! Its gotten so bad that going to court between two company's is going to be held based on the French document of the same (Canada's other Official language).
@psychonymphe, I'm not picking solely on you, however your post above stood out the most as arrogant, at least to me. There are others that did as well.
To members, moderators, & the thread op I'm sorry for going so off topic.
> Regarding the K800 camera abilities JUST how much can it be improved via firmware? I'm very curious.
|AppleTV2|iPhone 12Mini 256GB|iPad Pro 256GB| Previously ...  K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded T68i). |
sapporobaby
Joined: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Finland. Kuwait maybe :)
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-17 18:18:37, QVGA wrote:
this thread has gone way out of hand. its better if its locked.
|
|
You are the one that took this thread off track in the first place.
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
N82(YES), iPhone 3G, Shure es530, Nikon D300, more stuff. No more SE stuff, why am I still here? |
mcrosser
Joined: Oct 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Peru
PM |
well, It would be nice if the last post was the last one off-topic. I myself don't know how much it can improve, but certainly there will allways be room for an upgrade. This might be an extreme example, but not even a digital camera can match a human eye (not taking in zoom function), so at least that camera phones are catching up to digital cameras in queality is great for me. Cheers
AVAILABLE - advertise here!! |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
At-a-boy Mcrosser, nice salvage.
I'm beginning to think that consumer digital camera's, although may still be around and offer exclusive functions, more and more ppl WILL prefer quality cellphones that HAVE a camera at high MP resolution.
Pro cameras or those with interchangeable lenses will NEVER be replaced.
|AppleTV2|iPhone 12Mini 256GB|iPad Pro 256GB| Previously ... K750|Z500|Z520|K700|K790i|K850i, :Ericsson: T18z|T28World|T36m x3|T68m (Ericsson, not the rebranded T68i). |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-18 07:33:40, sapporobaby wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-17 18:18:37, QVGA wrote:
this thread has gone way out of hand. its better if its locked.
|
|
You are the one that took this thread off track in the first place.
|
|
ITs your pathetic attitude on this forum that seems to take every thread off track. I simply inquired about the 80GB iPOD and instead of calmly saying where u got it from, you had to write some crap with it. On any other forums, you'd be banned for this attitude. |
sapporobaby
Joined: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Finland. Kuwait maybe :)
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-18 08:13:39, Prom1 wrote:
At-a-boy Mcrosser, nice salvage.
I'm beginning to think that consumer digital camera's, although may still be around and offer exclusive functions, more and more ppl WILL prefer quality cellphones that HAVE a camera at high MP resolution.
Pro cameras or those with interchangeable lenses will NEVER be replaced.
|
|
I agree as well. What we are seeing is a sort of convergence of technolgies. However with this convergence comes compromise. There is no way a phone will ever replace a dedicate camera or a media device (i.e. iPod) but the camera phone/media device is a great niche device when someone wants to bounce around without having to bring the dedicated devices.
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
N82(YES), iPhone 3G, Shure es530, Nikon D300, more stuff. No more SE stuff, why am I still here? |
sapporobaby
Joined: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Finland. Kuwait maybe :)
PM |
Quote:
| ITs your pathetic attitude on this forum that seems to take every thread off track. I simply inquired about the 80GB iPOD and instead of calmly saying where u got it from, you had to write some crap with it. On any other forums, you'd be banned for this attitude.
|
|
Read your response about the iPod and then you will understand. As I said if I misunderstood then my bad as english is not your first language. As for taking this thread off track, I suggest you go back and read again. You have a complete lack of the nuances of marketing and why products are positioned the way they are. Your lack of understanding about what represents an upgrade is telling. Finally, I offered you the chance to move any additional comments you may have to PM but you insist on bringing it out here.
Look dude, don't bother responding. I do not think we really have more to say.
_________________
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
-/..../../...//.../../-/.//../...//--./---/../-./--.//-/---//-/...././/-../-
[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2006-10-18 08:45 ] | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2006-10-17 20:53
jay0726 | 
