| Author |
C905 Cybershot Xperience v 7.5 |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
guys, the video resolution has also been increased in this beta to 432x240
in case you did not notice..
@Dimabr
What are you doing? Your posts are not making any sense to me 
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2010-08-03 16:57 ] |
|
|
Dimabr
Joined: Jan 26, 2010
Posts: 78
PM |
I dunno but, i'd like know if we can get some diferent exposure pics from Best Pic to made HDR in sowtfware..
I love that one in Youtube video about that HDR  |
Dimabr
Joined: Jan 26, 2010
Posts: 78
PM |
On 2010-08-03 17:45:32, jake20 wrote:
guys, the video resolution has also been increased in this beta to 432x240
in case you did not notice..
@Dimabr
What are you doing? Your posts are not making any sense to me
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2010-08-03 16:57 ]
I was just trying toh show ya how to get real HDR from in sowftware..don't woories i got to be stupid...
[ This Message was edited by: Dimabr on 2010-08-03 17:08 ] |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
no worries.. we all friends here |
NEO1981
Joined: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 47
From: Mexico
PM |
@jake
i ve noticed that ,thanks,and the other thing is that the other camdrivers,like eltoffers's,produce a more heavier pictures,i think i would like that witchking do this in his camdriver,i really like having heavier pictures,maybe im wrong but mi idea is that if the picture results heavier its because its has more details,and thats why is heavier.
what do you yhink guys????
i remember taking a picture around 6 mb in 8 mpx with the last camdriver that eltoffer made.
that only a request,but i want your opinions.
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 18:42 ] |
prototype
Joined: Mar 02, 2010
Posts: 180
From: Moldova, Europe
PM |
My Hdr made with Nikon D90 ))
 |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
On 2010-08-03 19:41:27, NEO1981 wrote:
@jake
i ve noticed that ,thanks,and the other thing is that the other camdrivers,like eltoffers's,produce a more heavier pictures,i think i would like that witchking do this in his camdriver,i really like having heavier pictures,maybe im wrong but mi idea is that if the picture results heavier its because its has more details,and thats why is heavier.
what do you yhink guys????
i remember taking a picture around 6 mb in 8 mpx with the last camdriver that eltoffer made.
that only a request,but i want your opinions.
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 18:42 ]
wow, 6MB is pretty big.. i am not sure I would want pictures this size unless there was a NOTICEABLE increase in detail and quality.
Macrae has increased the buffer, and reduced the compression in witchking's latest beta.. which is supposed to add some more detail. maybe that can be tuned some more, but it would only make sense if it really improved the quality a LOT.. otherwise having these huge file sizes are not worth it IMO. |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
another VHDR shot.. taken in very bright sunlight
 |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
good tutorial on HDR here --> http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/high-dynamic-range.htm |
McRae
Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Posts: 23
PM |
@Jake
Is there any possibility to make videos less compression/more buffer size? I haven't tried it yet 
modded C905 RULEZ !!! |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
On 2010-08-03 19:41:27, NEO1981 wrote:
@jake
i ve noticed that ,thanks,and the other thing is that the other camdrivers,like eltoffers's,produce a more heavier pictures,i think i would like that witchking do this in his camdriver,i really like having heavier pictures,maybe im wrong but mi idea is that if the picture results heavier its because its has more details,and thats why is heavier.
what do you yhink guys????
i remember taking a picture around 6 mb in 8 mpx with the last camdriver that eltoffer made.
that only a request,but i want your opinions.
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 18:42 ]
I just went back and checked and the buffer size, and it was actually smaller in eltoffer's driver than what our current witchking beta edited driver is.. i do not remember taking 6mb shots either. maybe my memory just bad |
NEO1981
Joined: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 47
From: Mexico
PM |
On 2010-08-03 22:29:13, jake20 wrote:
On 2010-08-03 19:41:27, NEO1981 wrote:
@jake
i ve noticed that ,thanks,and the other thing is that the other camdrivers,like eltoffers's,produce a more heavier pictures,i think i would like that witchking do this in his camdriver,i really like having heavier pictures,maybe im wrong but mi idea is that if the picture results heavier its because its has more details,and thats why is heavier.
what do you yhink guys????
i remember taking a picture around 6 mb in 8 mpx with the last camdriver that eltoffer made.
that only a request,but i want your opinions.
I just went back and checked and the buffer size, and it was actually smaller in eltoffer's driver than what our current witchking beta edited driver is.. i do not remember taking 6mb shots either. maybe my memory just bad
I think i have a backup of that picture,let me see if i can find it and upload it in a imagehost,but trust me it was near 6 mb and the details were awesome,an well the conditions made that picture possible beacuse it were good sunlight,and the light conditions made it,let me search on my pc,wait please.
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 21:41 ] |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
regarding bigger buffer size...
On 2009-09-30 19:11:43, eltoffer wrote:
to give some support to riderski comments, here is a pic 100% crop from these 2 drivers dm3.5 and mine 3.9, i cant notice any difference just a little on SHARPNESS but this is not due QUANTIZATION TABLE values just SHARPNESS, DM has 8 and mine has 4
BTW notice size pic is almost DOUBLE but it doesnt affet at all on image quality, thats why i didnt set a higher buffer size, i rather have more spce to music videos and photos than waste space for nothing at least nothing notable for my eyes
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2009-09-30 18:19 ]
|
NEO1981
Joined: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 47
From: Mexico
PM |
I did not found that picture but i have one in 8 mpx and its size is over 3 mb and im not telling lies i will proove it usig EXIF.
look at the colors and details of the grass,i think it was taken with the eltoffer's camdriver 3.6 i did not remember.
direct link: http://h.imagehost.org/view/0359/DSC00262
exif details:
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 22:29 ] |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
I am getting over 5mb file sizes right now on 8mp setting.. it all depends on the scene you are shooting |
|
|
Posted: 2010-08-03 17:45
