| Author |
C905 Cybershot Xperience v 7.5 |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
i am not trying to be rude, so I apologize if it came off that way.
The purpose of HDR for me is to capture the scene as it truly looks (with enhanced contrast possibly).. but not so much to create all kinds of crazy wild colors.
I am seeing many shots posted here which are not really good candidates for VHDR. The best scenes for HDR are ones where you have ample lighting, and where the camera has trouble exposing part of the scene due to lighting.
Scenes with the sky work best, as the camera lens usually have a hard time exposing the sky, and any foreground object at the same time.
What HDR does is manipulate the image to expose the sky, and the foreground object at the same time, to show the scene as it truly looked without the limitation of the camera lens focusing.
this at least how i am interpreting HDR.. |
|
|
McRae
Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Posts: 23
PM |
@Jake, @all:
There you go: edited beta CX 6.5 "VHDR edition" Try to compare with an original one  Witchking, what do you think? less compression/more buffer size as previous edit 
[ This Message was edited by: McRae on 2010-08-03 01:06 ] modded C905 RULEZ !!! |
SonofLiberty
Joined: Feb 09, 2010
Posts: 56
PM |
using edited (less compression) cbe 6.5 w/ vhdr
link to full pic: http://img9.imageshack.us/f/dsc02846kd.jpg/
[ This Message was edited by: SonofLiberty on 2010-08-03 00:05 ] |
SonofLiberty
Joined: Feb 09, 2010
Posts: 56
PM |
On 2010-08-02 23:30:45, McRae wrote:
@Jake, @all:
There you go: edited beta CX 6.5 "VHDR edition" Try to compare with an original one Witching, what do you think? less compression/more buffer size as previous edit
I posted an example pic above, and this reduces a lot of noise. Thanks man!
[ This Message was edited by: SonofLiberty on 2010-08-03 00:04 ] |
NEO1981
Joined: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 47
From: Mexico
PM |
This is the definition of HDR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range_imaging
and how about this pic:
 |
riksilvers
Joined: May 13, 2009
Posts: 139
From: Otley, West Yorkshire, UK
PM |
@NEO1981
Nice photo.... |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
which picture do you guys think looks better?
or
 |
XxDaviDxX
Joined: May 17, 2009
Posts: 95
From: Brazil
PM |
the first Pic. More Sharped edges...
[addsig] |
SonofLiberty
Joined: Feb 09, 2010
Posts: 56
PM |
On 2010-08-03 03:11:01, jake20 wrote:
which picture do you guys think looks better?
or
#2 |
NEO1981
Joined: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 47
From: Mexico
PM |
On 2010-08-03 03:11:01, jake20 wrote:
which picture do you guys think looks better?
or
Fist one,the second picture is darker,i know is a VHDR but it looks like the ones i fix with the smart contrast,and a little use of the photo dj. Im kind of suspicious that the virtual HDR uses smart contrast and color saturation from the photo dj. |
Dimabr
Joined: Jan 26, 2010
Posts: 78
PM |
VHDR 1.3
HDR from Photoshop
[ This Message was edited by: Dimabr on 2010-08-03 14:56 ] |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
On 2010-08-03 05:31:28, NEO1981 wrote:
Im kind of suspicious that the virtual HDR uses smart contrast and color saturation from the photo dj.
Hi NEO,
you may be right, but the end result does certainly produce a result that is very "similar" to the HDR images produced by photomatix software.
The VHDR mode also does seem to remove some of the detail as seen by my comparison shot above.
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2010-08-03 15:05 ] |
panonski
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 345
From: Croatia
PM |
Here exampled "HDR" pics are just waste of time. |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
@Dimabr,
what is VHDR 1.3? the setting for VHDR is EV+.07
I am not sure what you are doing |
Dimabr
Joined: Jan 26, 2010
Posts: 78
PM |
On 2010-08-03 16:50:28, panonski wrote:
Here exampled "HDR" pics are just waste of time.
This
 |
|
|
Posted: 2010-08-02 23:17
