| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
CruSifiXken
Joined: Jul 06, 2005
Posts: 215
PM |
Some of the pics I took while playing around 
How do you like them?
Taken with Iso-100 or 200
|
|
|
marinedisco
Joined: Jun 24, 2007
Posts: 68
From: Thailand
PM |
@crusifi
The 1st and 3rd look great!! The 2nd looks like the camera was shakking but still not too bad. |
CruSifiXken
Joined: Jul 06, 2005
Posts: 215
PM |
This one is the same as in the post above, but edited with PhotoDJ
2 statues from my granny's place
 |
fullforce
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
@CruSifiXken
My girlfriend went like- "ahhhh that's sooo cute", when she saw that cat
I fiddled with the ISO settting and when taking a shot indoors with very poor lightning. I set the ISO to 400 and there was a huge difference in the colours (a took a shot of two persons). The colour looked much more vivid and real then the shoot o took just before with auot settings. So once again- use the settings! I will try this with the ISO settings today and see if i can't get that, often present "white haze"that appears when shooting outdoors, dissapear.
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-10-28 12:34 ]
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-10-28 12:35 ] |
kallegod
Joined: Jul 02, 2004
Posts: 143
PM |
Some first shots
|
tai020381
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Actually I would prefer photofix to photo DJ. In an instant photofix will give me really nice results, but for photoDJ the auto level is not as good as photofix, only it has more functions to play around with. |
CruSifiXken
Joined: Jul 06, 2005
Posts: 215
PM |
On 2007-10-28 15:33:14, tai020381 wrote:
Actually I would prefer photofix to photo DJ. In an instant photofix will give me really nice results, but for photoDJ the auto level is not as good as photofix, only it has more functions to play around with.
From my own experience, Photofix always 'over-lightens' *If you know what I mean, too much whiteness* the picture...
Now,to increase the cuteness-level even more!
Today I went to choose a puppy, that will join our family the 17th of December
What do you guys think?
[ This Message was edited by: CruSifiXken on 2007-10-28 18:04 ] |
zootzoot
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Somewhere In London UK
PM |
Esato F/b (+52, -0) Ebay: zoot-zoot (497)100%
PS3 ID: zootzoot
http://a-zott.com/tz.aspx
twiiter.com/zootzoot |
ryanchg
Joined: Oct 18, 2007
Posts: 117
From: Asia
PM |
@CruSifiXken, is that a beagle?
hmm.. i'm missing my phone now.. I returned it to the store due to keypad failure.. sudden spoilers i know  but i'm gonna get a green/black set in return!.. *waits*
@zootzoot, try zooming x2 before snapping that shot, it's overexposed by the flash.
_________________
I  k850i
[ This Message was edited by: ryanchg on 2007-10-28 19:01 ] |
p!xarus
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 108
From: Norway
PM |
A new autumn pic from me...
What could I have done different?
 |
fullforce
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
@p!xarus
I don't know how you should done anything different. It's not easy to get thet kind of shot super good because you got different types of light and motifes that's in different range. Nice one!
Well my girlfriend, and friends for that matter, are getting itred of me running around taking shot on everything all the time:)
Why don't we start a club- "The cyber shot freaks"! Only cyber branded phones allowed off course!
These to are runned through photo DJ
but they where good g´berore that:)
This one-best pic
I'm so happy that this phone can reproduce the colours red and blue in a perfect way. I was getting mad at my N73 who failed misserably in that area.
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-10-28 21:55 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2007-10-28 20:14:05, p!xarus wrote:
A new autumn pic from me...
What could I have done different?
the light on the object is A & O........(special with cell phone cameras)...if the light is right, it realy easy to create a picture with good sharpness.
sitting right now on a Hotel in Stockholm..(holiday in the sun
have been taken some realy nice pictures beside the water....show them tomorow..(have only Pernillas laptop with mobile 3G broadband)
_________________
I k850i,  w810i &  T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-28 21:57 ] |
fullforce
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
A photo related question..actually two:
Why does the phone(at least mine) change or fade the picture to a softer version of the shot when you start viewing your pics? It starts "remaking" the shot from the top and then contiunes down. I don't know if it does thies with every pic you are viewing but it does it often.
And why does the shots you have taken and put as background pic on your phone look like a fuzzu blurry pic? I mean the display CAN display sharp pics, so why doesn't it? It might not be so much noticable on other shots then macro ones...i don't know.
Any one else noticed this?
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-10-28 22:00 ]
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-10-28 22:07 ]
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2007-10-28 22:23 ] |
indup
Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 243
PM |
On 2007-10-28 23:00:07, fullforce wrote:
A photo related question..actually two:
Why does the phone(at least mine) change or fade the picture to a softer version of the shot when you start viewing your pics? It starts "remaking" the shot from the top and then contiunes down.
it does this when you view in landscape on all pictures but not in portrait view. |
fullforce
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2007-10-28 23:34:17, indup wrote:
On 2007-10-28 23:00:07, fullforce wrote:
A photo related question..actually two:
Why does the phone(at least mine) change or fade the picture to a softer version of the shot when you start viewing your pics? It starts "remaking" the shot from the top and then contiunes down.
it does this when you view in landscape on all pictures but not in portrait view.
Yes it probably does. A pitty but it doesn't matter that much.
But why the phone won't display a pic in good and sharp quality as a background pic is a real pitty! |
|
|
Posted: 2007-10-28 10:35
