| Author |
Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 |
smuko
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Posts: 127
From: Sofia, Bulgaria
PM |
Guys, i'm totally lost in this conversation.. what do you mean by "filtering"? Noise filter or resize filter? Because these are different things.. resize filters such as bilinear filter, bicubic, nearest neighbour, etc - these are used when you resize pictures to preserve the detail - if this is the case, then filtering is a good thing.. but if it's a noise filter, we might lose some details (as well as some noise).. So what kind of filtering are you talking about? |
|
|
wayne_rooney
Joined: Nov 30, 2006
Posts: 100
PM |
On 2007-09-06 18:20:46, Raiderski wrote:
super frame rate... 
this "super frame rate" has major disadvantage but nevermind...
disadvantage... 
plz can u explain.. wats fault in using softer frame rate... |
lpachuong
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Vietnam
PM |
It is said that the slower frame rate is, the better focus. U can check it by urself
[addsig] |
Coo|io
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
Posts: 51
From: somewere
PM |
that`s true what u r saying there |
Milu
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Posts: 99
PM, WWW
|
Oh. i have to say the a4a 8.0 with the indoor profile make so good photos with cid 49
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=6968#
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewfullsize.php?id=6969#
there is a little noise and its blurry, but it my hand shaking:P
[ This Message was edited by: Milu on 2007-09-07 10:33 ] |
DarKMaGiCiaN
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
I really cant understand this camera !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I took a shot today at exactlly mid day 12:00 ( I just see it now )
any way
look to the summary of the pic
F-Number : F/2.8
Exposure Time : 1/1600 sec
ISO : ISO-100
I think every thing is normal
but the size of the pic
it is 1.87 MB and the quality of the pic
usually when I took a good pic I try to Auto level the color in Macromedia Fireworks and save it in my computer but this pic it auto leveled even and I cant see any different between the pic before and after the color Auto level
here is the pic
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=6970
[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2007-09-07 10:52 ] |
wayne_rooney
Joined: Nov 30, 2006
Posts: 100
PM |
On 2007-09-07 08:05:03, lpachuong wrote:
It is said that the slower frame rate is, the better focus. U can check it by urself
so u recommend not to use... that frame rate code.. right? for photos not video... ???? |
Milu
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Posts: 99
PM, WWW
|
U know. i donk know what heppen. i usen on this photo a4a 8.0 and look at that :
anyone have idea how to make picture like that in good quality??
[ This Message was edited by: Milu on 2007-09-07 12:07 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Milu on 2007-09-07 12:08 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Milu on 2007-09-07 12:09 ] |
silverxii
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Posts: 8
PM |
@lpachuong
I tested A4A 8.0 CT1 95 and CT2 89
CT1 95 crashed the first time I used ENM, but subsequent tries were okay.
CT2 89 crashed each time I used ENM, 4 crashes out of 4 tries. Weird considering the compression is supposed to be lower.
The overexposure on zoom 1.1 ev+2.0 was reduced compared to full auto due to the indoor profile. Good work lpachuong.
Regarding the sharpness, CT1 was slightly better than CT2, but CT2 with zoom 1.5/1.1 ev+2.0 was very very sharp.
However, the noise on the screen was a lot, although the noise in the picture taken was much less.
CT1 95 shutter spd at 2.7, rest auto
CT2 85 shutter spd 2.7, rest auto
CT2 85 ev+2.0, zoom 1.5
the sharpest one here... although a tinny too bright
Phone is CID49 K750i
Thanks again to lpachuong and raiderski
[ This Message was edited by: silverxii on 2007-09-07 15:57 ] |
lpachuong
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Vietnam
PM |
Hello Everyone. How are you doing? Sorry for my late reply today since I was at the school all day. It is nice to visit this forum and check PMs 
About the indoor profile: Thank you for ur tests on this. I will improve it this weekend as well as the compression.
About CT, which 1 do u like? Please tell me which is better and on which phone.
Thank you for all ur helps.
@Milu: about that picture, could u please tell me where was the sun? Was it behind ur back?
@All: Nice to see u all here
[addsig] |
lpachuong
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Vietnam
PM |
@Darkmagician: If you use JPEGSnoop u will see the different in the rate of compression and bit/pixel. That is 1 of the reason
[addsig] |
DarKMaGiCiaN
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-09-07 19:03:03, lpachuong wrote:
@Darkmagician: If you use JPEGSnoop u will see the different in the rate of compression and bit/pixel. That is 1 of the reason
lpachuong what is surprising me is I have K750i cid36 and as every body know that it can handle untill 608 mb otherwise camera will cash
but this the secound time it happend to me
one when I got 800 mb and now 1.87 MB which is impossible in my opinion
|
silverxii
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Posts: 8
PM |
@lpachuong
I think I like CT2 better
CT1 may appear slightly warmer due to slightly more red/yellow in the pictures but it does not match the real world colour correctly.
CT2 is nearer to real world colour but may look slightly less colourful
So, i think it depends on the user.
Personally I think both are okay for me. CT2 is more prone to crash though. I dunno why.
Also, where did you learn the programming language from? Any guides to help? |
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-09-07 20:06:39, silverxii wrote:
@lpachuong
I think I like CT2 better
CT1 may appear slightly warmer due to slightly more red/yellow in the pictures but it does not match the real world colour correctly.
CT2 is nearer to real world colour but may look slightly less colourful
I agree |
Milu
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Posts: 99
PM, WWW
|
lpachuong
U know.. the sun is behin the cloud. there where u see a lot of light net to the building or behind it i dont remember.
oh and one more think. this driver indoor are bot so bad...
tomorrow i post some pics
[ This Message was edited by: Milu on 2007-09-07 20:44 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-09-06 22:02
