| Author |
Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho) |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
plastic lens ??? he he...yeh sure.....its glass bäng-pelle.
|
|
|
jms2367
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Posts: 302
From: The Philippines
PM |
couldn't be plastic |
daviep
Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: bonnie scotland
PM |
i've got both a k800 and k850.the k800 is good for just point and shooting photos,the k850 needs to have the settings adjusted most times to produce good photos.
i hope the c905 is like the k800,open lens cover,point and shoot=good photo |
Sony α
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
|
Haha, plastic lens!
However, unless you are talking Polycarbonates, or Polyurethanes, both of which while are effective in eyeglasses, would be the worst for camera optics, due to the high chromatic abberation (Purple fringing)!
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-06-22 13:25:28, Sony α wrote:
Haha, plastic lens!
However, unless you are talking Polycarbonates, or Polyurethanes, both of which while are effective in eyeglasses, would be the worst for camera optics, due to the high chromatic abberation (Purple fringing)!
"Purple fringing"... Now, where did I hear that mentioned before...?
|
jepherberich
Joined: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 473
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-06-20 17:33:44, Aeronautico wrote:
Here it is (from http://developer.sonyericsson[....]s/phonegallery/c905/p_c905.jsp ):
Radio Bands:
C905 UMTS/HSDPA 2100, GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900
C905a UMTS/HSDPA 850/1900/2100, GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900
C905c EDGE 850/900/1800/1900
So it's Chinese version that lacks the video call camera. Period.
I was just backing jepherberich up on his statement: everybody was busy murdering him while he was making sense! lol
On the torch issue, I just mentioned for I read a couple of posts of concern and nobody cleared it yet. No problem with me: it'd have been if it was missing.
I am still pis**d for the apparent lack of decent video recording (which I do use a lot) and for the (rather simple to add) flash-always-on option, also quite important in many daylight situations. I also missed the burst shooting mode I believe?
Thanks for posting this; the whitepaper is confusing in that it uses the name "C905" to refer to what apparently is the "C905c" and there's no clear-cut information anywhere either. You can't blame all these  fanboys (myself included) for being too passionate about the details! 
Personally I don't think I need "DVD-quality recording" on a camera, much less on a camera on a phone. I still feel like the baseline should be at least YouTube "high quality", i.e., 640x480 @ 30fps. Then again it's already difficult enough to repurpose a still picture lens and use it for taking videos. The same principle applies on why even the highest-end video cameras don't take still photos that stack up against DSLR's
|
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-06-22 14:10:43, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2008-06-22 13:25:28, Sony α wrote:
Haha, plastic lens!
However, unless you are talking Polycarbonates, or Polyurethanes, both of which while are effective in eyeglasses, would be the worst for camera optics, due to the high chromatic abberation (Purple fringing)!
"Purple fringing"... Now, where did I hear that mentioned before...?
...maybe,to the pictures that k850 produces?? ;( |
Sony α
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
|
@Masada
Yup, with the K850i for sure!
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
|
mediar
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
...Fujifilm Finepix S5700 has plastic lens and it's heavy 307g ( I have it ).
Fujifilm Finepix S9500 has glass lens, that's why it's heavy 750g.
SE C905 is 136 g. So where can be the glass lens??? Just think. The glass is much more heavy than the plastic.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/t8673t6447501747/
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-06-22 14:31:27, mediar wrote:
...Fujifilm Finepix S5700 has plastic lens and it's heavy 307g ( I have it ).
Fujifilm Finepix S9500 has glass lens, that's why it's heavy 750g.
SE C905 is 136 g. So where can be the glass lens??? Just think. The glass is much more heavy than the plastic.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/t8673t6447501747/
The size of the lens in a camera phone is probably less than 1g, no matter the material.
|
mediar
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
You are not right. You should read some books about this.  However lets stop this.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
xell
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
But you can't by any means compare the size of the Finepix' lens with that of a mobile phone. |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-06-22 14:54:58, mediar wrote:
You are not right. You should read some books about this. However lets stop this.
Stop now so you think you got the final word?
And how heavy would you think a camera phone lens, less than 5mm in diameter would be??? We're not talking uranium here but plastic and glass!
|
shyam335
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: 127.0.0.1
PM |
OT: S5700 has plastic lens?
There are a terrible lot of lies going around the world, and the worst of it is half of them are true - Winston Churchill
We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us - Winston Churchill |
mediar
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
Yes...S5000 has plastic lens too.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
|
|
Posted: 2008-06-22 12:04
