| Author |
Pics of all your Phones (HQ pics appreciated) |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
On 2008-11-06 04:17:01, AbuBasim wrote:
See how I managed to steer back on topic with that last photo? 
 Nice one AbuBasim.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
|
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
My last i-mobile 902 photo: I replaced the Arabic keyboard on my old E61i with the European version. I ordered the keyboard from cnn.cn (highly recommended if you want to DIY with phone part replacements), and had change the product code of the phone with NSS and then flash the phone with a new OS to have the correct keyboard mapping.
Original: http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ile_902/20081103175835u0JL.jpg
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
we all know that i-mobile take great night pics, i was talking about outdoor, and was quoting max-wedge about how smeary outdoor looks.
(and no, i have no intention to post some pics who shows that, just visit the photo section if you want proof....over & out).
Flying c902........................
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-06 08:33 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-11-06 09:06:30, plankgatan wrote:
we all know that i-mobile take great night pics, i was talking about outdoor, and was quoting max-wedge about how smeary outdoor looks.
I can't see the post where max_wedge was saying that about smeary outdoor photos. I see you making that statement on the previous page.
and no, i have no intention to post some pics who shows that
Of course not, since you know that I would embarrass you with counter-posts comparing with your C902 photos.
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-11-06 10:25 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
whatever......i-mobile902 still produce smeary daylight pics...
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-06 10:42 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
So you're saying that the daylight shots are smeary but you will not show examples of this. I doubt that you know the meaning of the word.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
smeary, unsharp, dissy, i really give a damn how i pronuonce my meaning of the quality...(they looks smeary in my eyes, period)
non of this pictures, is either sharp or have clear/crispy quality. and like i quoted max.wedge, THEY HAVE NOR SOME SUPERIOR DETAILS.
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=samart&model=i-mobile+902
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=samart&model=i-mobile+902
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=samart&model=i-mobile+902
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=samart&model=i-mobile+902
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=samart&model=i-mobile+902
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12907
thats the last from me about this crap inside this thread........
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-06 11:37 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-11-06 12:05:49, plankgatan wrote:
and like i quote max.wedge, THEY HAVE NOT SOME SUPERIOR DETAILS.
Again you say that max_wedge said this when in fact it was you. You're putting your words in other people's mouths.
Go back and see what he actually said:
On 2008-11-05 06:57:06, max_wedge wrote:
The CMOS sensors in camera phones are still pretty crap compared to CCD.
You will notice most compacts use CCD.
When you look at noise profile of C902 compared to imobile, the imobile comes out way on top. It doesn't have the water-colour affect that results from the C902 using too heavy handed Noise Reduction to deal with the noise problem of the tiny cmos sensor.
Over all I would judge both camera phones equal, with the imobile having superior detail (without noise or heavy NR).
You're posting a bunch of pictures without showing what's wrong with them?! I've seen you do the same things when talking other phones as well. Is this part of your FUD campaign against all non-C902 phones?
I've also seen your comments in the C905 photos thread where you make these subtle hints that C905 photos are not very good. You want to put fear, uncertainty and doubt in people's minds about the C905 and make them buy the C902 instead?
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-11-06 11:24 ] |
J273
Joined: Apr 06, 2004
Posts: 354
From: Swadlincote
PM, WWW
|
No longer have the X1 now have the HD
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
just the Xperia left..then your collection is complete
|
J273
Joined: Apr 06, 2004
Posts: 354
From: Swadlincote
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-11-07 00:17:06, plankgatan wrote:
just the Xperia left..then your collection is complete
Had one didn't like it tbh so replaced it with the HD
|
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
Old K Cybershot family members
|
aw614
Joined: Jul 31, 2006
Posts: 64
PM |
well that was quick...my w900i is stuck at please wait screen after flashing with xs++, gonna have to fix this to use it |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
@plank, the low light c902 you posted is certainly clear - but it's also under-exposed (due to centre of exposure being the sunset).
I used this technique on the K750 to get noise free (but under exposed) low light pics. But it still doesn't change the fact that a properly exposed low light cheap cmos pic has massive noise or detail destroying NR.
I agree with Abusim about the desire for the ability to take true low light pics without noise or wavy noise reduction artifacts.
It doesn't have to be CCD, but it's just that at this stage of digital sensor technology, at the small sensor sizes needed in mobile phones, CMOS just isn't capable of producing the nice clear noise free images that a comparably sized CCD can.
But the situation is improving all the time. I predict that CCD will never be common in mobile phones, but that CMOS technology will improve to the point where we get good low light performance even in small CMOS sensors. A good example of progression in this area is the Olympus 4/3rds CMOS sensor, the smallest DSLR sensor yet and still very good quality - good enough to compete with the big boys of DSLR (see the E3 for example)
And, not quite as smooth as Abusim's segue, here's my phone pic 
Makes a great little dedicated mp3 player, but shite phone...
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sony Ericsson G700
Very nice replacement for my expired i-mobile 902, although not due to the camera (duh!), but for everything else, including WALKMAN 3.0 that plays my DRM-stripped iTunes music and audio books without the need for converting to other formats.
Also, this is my first phone in a long time (since K700i) that doesn't give of cereal noises from it's case
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-11-07 17:02 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-11-06 04:19
