Author |
you guys are wrong...maybe....not......hot news READ and learn |
Vlammetje Joined: Mar 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Den Haag PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2003-12-15 00:13:14, dana wrote:
But the conclusion is that SE phones does a netupdate very often, thats why the signalbars fluctuate so much (more then a Nokia) do you agree with that?
|
|
Why do you care if I agree or not?
What influence will it have on your life if I agree or not?
Drop it woman!!!
Get on with yer life and I solemnly promise I will get on with mine.
As for the bell shaped radiation, i am sorry to report that I am not located directly under the transmitter. Also I didn't think it was bell shaped, but more round-shaped.
I'd go and test my signal right underneath but I can't pinpoint the exact location. You'll just have to take my word for it that the signal never drops anywhere in the building.
|
|
grapetonix Joined: Jun 08, 2003 Posts: 59 PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-12-15 01:00:00, gelfen wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2003-12-15 00:13:14, dana wrote:
But the conclusion is that SE phones does a netupdate very often, thats why the signalbars fluctuate so much (more then a Nokia) do you agree with that?
|
|
NOBODY ever actually disagreed!!!!!!!!!!!
i thought all the activity in this thread meant it was about something interesting, and not an argument about a fact which has been known for ages (why does this keep coming up, i dunno...)
@Jim: wrt tower transmission in a bell curve (certainly more interesting than the rest of this thread - where's mixin and his TWAT post when you need him?) i would really love to see the radio transmitter that couldn't transmit omnidirectionally - i.e. in all directions at once. any radio wave source transmits signal in a spherical shape, with strength (intensity) decreasing proportional to 1/r^2. the only reason a bell shape may seem to manifest is because the signal is blocked by the structure of the tower. this affect would really only be limited to a relatively short radius immediately around the tower base or directly under it. so, unless vlam sits right under the ass of the tower she should get great reception on her phone.
hope that clears it up. if i'm mistaken i apologise and someone please correct me, but i'm trying to remember EM theory from my university days - which weren't all that short a time ago.
_________________
Gee, does that beat me? I only got two pair - two aces, and another two.
[ This Message was edited by: gelfen on 2003-12-15 00:01 ]
|
|
Just attach a yagi or waveguide / sectorized gain antenna on the base station? THEN it might be near-impossible to grab a signal below the base station. If it transmits 360šomni, no. |
Caveman Joined: Jan 15, 2003 Posts: 168 From: Cambridge, UK PM |
It seems like there's a flock of parrots in this thread
[addsig] |
Vlammetje Joined: Mar 01, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Den Haag PM, WWW
|
Oh well..... I guess the subject is closed after all
|
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|