Author |
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact Announced |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
http://m.hotukdeals.com/deals/xperia-z3-compact-pre-order-for-347-99-delivered-handtec-1998462
Handtec £347 😀 I wouldn't mind this handset in white
Phone?? What phone?? |
|
Shino03 Joined: Dec 22, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Pearl of the Orient Seas PM |
All I can say is Sony and Samsung have different approaches again in terms of their camera. What pisses me off is that gsmarena is too biased towards Samsung. Yes, oversharpening makes the photos look nice in general but in the expense of details as shown below. (Look at the roof!)
It's pissing me off that people think in a glance that the samsung have the better picture quality when in reality the two can't be compared because of the different approach.
AND YES, sharper image does not always mean better looking photos. Now, I can conclude how unprofessional gsmarena is based from there conclusion that the alpha has the upper camera performance, they could have made it clearer and stated otherwise that it produces sharper photos with some lost of details
[ This Message was edited by: Shino03 on 2014-09-14 15:29 ] |
miromiromi Joined: Jul 25, 2013 Posts: 481 PM |
^i think the better term there is "cleaner" or "less noisy" photos. with sony's very obvious sharpening (on pixel peeping perspective), it's supposed to be the one with the sharper photos.
--- EDITED ---
I withdraw my unnecessary comment so we can avoid unnecessary discussions here. I apologize for the careless comment that made someone feel alluded to and feel the need to call me out even if I did not mention his name nor address him.
[ This Message was edited by: miromiromi on 2014-09-14 17:28 ] |
Shino03 Joined: Dec 22, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Pearl of the Orient Seas PM |
My bad. Sorry. Yes, you're correct the Z3C have the sharper images and the Alpha have the cleaner one due to overprocessing. |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
@miromiromi was that a dig at myself about buying a Sony and then ranting about it?? Well getting a new phone I won't be posting about it on here from now on because of people like yourself who make others feel unwelcome. Please keep your views about me to yourself
Phone?? What phone?? |
admad Joined: May 26, 2005 Posts: > 500 From: Poland PM |
And who cares what reviewer say? GSMArena were probably used to shit quality from Sony, they didn't notice a difference?:D I never read a conclusion, because the user alone has to make one, I really don't care what they say about camera quality, I just go there and look for myself, then press my own judgement. To be fair, they were always saying good words about Z, Z1 and Z2 camera while it was pretty shitty.
As for camera quality, Z3C is of course better than Alpa, for photos it's even better than S5, now Sammy only leads in Video quality, but by far less margin than with Z2.
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2014-09-14 17:07 ] |
Gitaroo Joined: Aug 17, 2013 Posts: > 500 PM |
alpha definitely doesn't take better picture, not even in the same league. Look at all the missing details. Image softening OR sharpening can be done later but details won't magically appear. |
XperiaJunkie Joined: Dec 13, 2012 Posts: > 500 From: Parts Unknown PM, WWW
|
Another Btekt video. This time against the iPhone 5s
: http://youtu.be/s5HptRw9uNQ (iPhone 5s)
: http://youtu.be/LbEQfiWjXrU (Z3 Compact)
[ This Message was edited by: XperiaJunkie on 2014-09-14 18:15 ] I'm so happy 'cause today I've found my friends ... They're in my head
|
McKinley Joined: Feb 23, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA PM |
Only phony enthusiasts would say that details in pictures don't matter and that "cleaner" (smeary) shots is the way to go.
So Sony got 20.7MP, srhink the size down to 12MP and you will see a huge difference between Alpha and Sony .
Some people are so funny with their silly arguments.
GH688, T28, T39 and T68 Nokia 6110, 8110, 8850, 6230, N82 Moto V525 and RAZR V3 Samsung T100, S300 and E700 T68, T610, Z600, T630, K700, S700, V800, K750, S600, M600, S500, P1i, K850, X1 X10, Vivaz |
Gitaroo Joined: Aug 17, 2013 Posts: > 500 PM |
if detail don't matter then we might as well stick to 2 MP camera for eternity. |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2014-10-10 03:08 ] |
doministry Joined: Apr 13, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: PL PM, WWW
|
On 2014-09-15 01:47:29, Bonovox wrote:
On 2014-09-14 22:05:32, McKinley wrote:
Only phony enthusiasts would say that details in pictures don't matter and that "cleaner" (smeary) shots is the way to go.
So Sony got 20.7MP, srhink the size down to 12MP and you will see a huge difference between Alpha and Sony .
Some people are so funny with their silly arguments.
You shouldn't have to shrink photos down most people won't. I have yet to see anything stunning from Sony cameras on any of these Xperia devices. I have a very fussy eye about detail & Samsung have done alot better than Sony of late.
There are nice Sammy forums around. Please use it.
As for shrinking, 99% of people watch it fullscreen on the PC. Which is essentially shrinking it, nobody's examining details. It's like I would buy Avedon's album and instead of experiencing his art I'd examine the milimeter details.
If you'd ever knew what to actually do with the device and what to use it for, you'd know.
But you're clueless whiner who loves to waste others time here and not having any good reason or experience to discuss.
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2014-09-15 09:33 ] a w a r e |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2014-10-10 03:09 ] |
willem1 Joined: Sep 12, 2014 Posts: 14 PM |
On 2014-09-15 11:54:00, Bonovox wrote:
No I am not clueless I know a lot more about photography than you know but as usual you judge others. You just cannot accept any sort of critical view about Sony you always get aggressive at others. Am sick and tired of you
If i read your history comments, man o man your so sammie boy, so go to your beloved sammie site and cry |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
I am not a Sammy boy I've had all brands I currently don't own any Samsung. You see you lot you compare Samsung v Sony photo quality in these so called forums saying oh it's so much better than Samsung. But if anyone else dares to comment and say Samsung is better photo quality you all get so defensive and start shouting . It's ok for you to compare but nobody else is allowed to say a word it's pathetic. I previously said I wouldn't mind one of these it's a nice device but that doesn't mean am going to buy one. As usual I get hit by a sarcastic comment by miromiromi. Jesus it's just a phone take it on the chin your all such cry babies when someone debates how good or not something is about Sony. Truth is Sony image processing is done way better by many other manufacturers who use their sensors.
Phone?? What phone?? |
|