| Author |
Sony Ericsson C905 VS Samsung i8510? |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
new arm race - Eldar was right...
|
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
whit what ???? (that C905 have a Samsung cam module...he he)
|
Guto_ViP
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: |Brazil|
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-05 21:11:40, plankgatan wrote:
i want
night pics
low light//indoor pics
flash pics
daylight is allready there
and some panorama pics (8510 have some automatic panorama feature who looks cool)
before i say its awesome
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-05 20:17 ]
Me too when i said better camera and video record.
Always for me i look for on phone with the best camera... because i dont like to use digital camera and i dont like transport it with me for where i go.
Love or hate me...  Nokia 5120 -> Nokia 6120 -> SE T200 -> Motorola V800 -> SE W800 (stay with my wife) - > SE K800 (stay with my mom) -> Nokia N82 Silver -> Nokia N82 Black Edition - Firmware v30.0.019 -> What is the next??. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
Plank read my post again and look at mobile-review maybe you will understand. story with Eldar and Samsung sensor is like story with you and SE phones based on Java Platform, so don't be sarcastic ok? 
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-05 20:55 ] |
alukardgt
Joined: Nov 06, 2007
Posts: 77
PM |
wtf ?????? 
_________________
El ignorante es atrevido 
Yo mi W910
[ This Message was edited by: alukardgt on 2008-08-05 21:09 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
yeah relax I know that! it's quite funny to read some posts here and not only here:
"bla bla... C905 photo quality sucks... I quit"
in Emo kids language:
"bla bla... world sucks... I will cut my veins with the razor
|
naveedaziz83
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Saudi Arabia
PM |
@raiderski
hehe thtz funny man
_________________
k800i R8BF003 FS and MAIN
Withan V3 + N1 2.99.9 SE2
Peter V2 k800 + W880 Xtreme Farfields
Modded Menu
[ This Message was edited by: nabhatti on 2008-08-05 21:19 ] |
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
On 2008-08-05 21:11:40, plankgatan wrote:
@alex. i have not said Samsung 8510 camera is bad. (i nearly said the opposite). i just said some lonely pics dosent tells 100% truth about a good allround camera.
i want
night pics
low light//indoor pics
flash pics
daylight is allready there
and some panorama pics (8510 have some automatic panorama feature who looks cool)
before i say its awesome
more 8510 pics. the colors is NOT spot on... but ok
_________________
How do you know the colors are NOT spot on? Were you the one taking those pictures? Were you able to compare the picture with the actual objects in question? |
Klue2k
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: 43
PM |
I don't know what everyone's fighting about. The c905 hasn't even been officially released yet so how can you guys compare photos now when its going to be tweaked and fixed by the final version.
On that note, why not wait till the c905 is released before you start criticising. |
-GaN-
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Posts: 19
PM |
Mobile-Review.com Preview:
http://mobile-review.com/review/samsung-innov8-camera.shtml
it has 2 video samples and a lot of comparisons and image samples. Its surprising how it looks like it beats a 7.1mp Canon Camera |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
The night shots are pathetic to say the least.
Anyways, geat outdoor shots.But I still vouch for the C905 sharpness.The C905 has much better indoor shots. |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-06 07:15:10, se_dude wrote:
The C905 has much better indoor shots.
Agree.
C905 comes to surprise me that it doesn't have the oil painting feeling that K850/C902 have (a lot of it) when shooting indoors.
INNOV owns the outdoor shots though. But indoor shots have too much noise reduction and lost the details.
_________________
Feel free to visit my art gallery.
Macheli @DeviantArt
Where has the old time Esato gone, where reviews were balanced and reliable? *sigh*
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-06 06:21 ] |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
macro
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/macro/high/photo02.jpg
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/macro/high/photo05.jpg
Seen much better shots.
Night shots
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/macro/high/photo05.jpg
This was in a light source but all blurry.
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/night/high/photo05.jpg
But some good shots too. Good camera. C905 has better macro,low light and indoor shots.
|
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
the good thing i feel about c905 is that it seems not to use too hard post-processing/noise reduction anymore, such as in k850/c902. so i can say that pics produced by c905 is more "raw", "untouched", like the old SE. they have grainy looks, but details are there, and also the oil painting effects are minimal, even in low light. it's such a good news actually after suffering a lots of details loss from previous Cybershot series.
however.. the colors are still a bit wrong, and seem washed out. but as long as details are maintained, i think it's not really hard to make a good and sharp pictures with c905, with post editing in PC to strengthen the quality of its color reproduction. (pc editing will be a lot easier and more possible when the images are rawer, and still producing well-detailed pics)
_________________
Feel free to visit my art gallery.
Macheli @DeviantArt
Where has the old time Esato gone, where reviews were balanced and reliable? *sigh*
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-06 06:59 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-06 07:01 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
Amras, are you talking about. C902 looks oilpaint indoor ???
does this looks like some god damn oil paint. (so tired of some people who give this judgements... (open your eyes for the love of god)
and how do you mean that BOTH k850 and C902 uses same post-processing/noise reduction... its quite big different between k850 & c902, their balance between noise and colors-saturation has been improved quite much.
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-06 09:56 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-05 21:28
