| Author |
Another K750 vs K850 camera comprassion, and again we have the same winner |
calypso1595
Joined: Apr 25, 2008
Posts: 57
From: Canada
PM |
The k850i has alot more settings though (wb, iso, etc) which as was pointed out need to be used properly, instead of assuming auto everything will produce better pics. |
|
|
Luhccas-U1a
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Try a macro with details like this with k750...
And here the full size pic without any mod
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12707
Tomorrow i'll post some outdoors pics against your "winner" |
calypso1595
Joined: Apr 25, 2008
Posts: 57
From: Canada
PM |
It begins |
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
On 2008-07-02 03:49:46, luhccas-k790 wrote:
Try a macro with details like this with k750...
here you go ... from a w810, but same family.
W810 CID49 R4EA031 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
he he he. this thread will go on forever.
(and like i said some pages back).
if i take example a portrait pic with my k850 (with any settings i like),
then i take same picture with a k750 (with any settings i like),
i know k850 picture will become sharper and have better details.
its "impossible" for a k750 to produce this kind of tiny details & sharpness, (sure k750 can take good close up-pics as well, but not in the same way)
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-02 09:02 ] |
Luhccas-U1a
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
W810 can produce good close up shots but our eyes shows what is ''great'' and just ''good''.K850i isn't a -point and shoot- phone,we all no this... |
Sony α
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
|
Exactly,
The K850i requires one to use the 'Manual' modes on the handset, and then produce such results - as said before, it's not a 'P&S' - but - as a 'P&S' it can deliver some stunning shots, the problem is - the majority of the uninformed do not use the AutoFocus lol!
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
|
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
On 2008-07-02 11:08:00, luhccas-k790 wrote:
W810 can produce good close up shots but our eyes shows what is ''great'' and just ''good''.K850i isn't a -point and shoot- phone,we all no this...
you're joking right? here have a look at these ... all from k750 and all are in the top 25 in the gallery. i don't see too many k850s with this kind of detail.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=9644
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=314
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=7295
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=659
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=7799
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=9689
W810 CID49 R4EA031 |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
amazing. and thank you for sharing the full-sized and original pics that we can believe that they are not edited. 
[addsig] |
calypso1595
Joined: Apr 25, 2008
Posts: 57
From: Canada
PM |
Those are some good shots plank |
brazzuka's
Joined: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South World-Antartida-Sweden
PM, WWW
|
cronos555
you're joking right? here have a look at these ... all from k750 and all are in the top 25 in the gallery. i don't see too many k850s with this kind of detail.
No? u have sure? what´s this?
http://www.esato.com/board/vi[....]pic=169423&start=0#post2378733
and this
more?? ok one more time
[ This Message was edited by: brazuka on 2008-07-03 04:13 ] |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
Those k750 pics Cronos posted have better colors. Very natural.
[addsig] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-07-02 11:27:36, Sony α wrote:
Exactly,
The K850i requires one to use the 'Manual' modes on the handset, and then produce such results - as said before, it's not a 'P&S' - but - as a 'P&S' it can deliver some stunning shots, the problem is - the majority of the uninformed do not use the AutoFocus lol!
i agree 100%. (i have never said K850 is the best point & shoot....k800/k810 is the best point & shoot, (k750 is also of course good point & shoot, but k800/k810 is better).
but once again, if you use settings with K850 (who is preinstalled when you start the phone (daylight for example) you get often very good close up quality.
---------------------------
ps. this "fly" pics is good (no doubt about it), but if you look closely you see it also lacks this last sharpness K850 often get.
so for me, K850 or K750, it easy...k850 of course, (why go back to old stuff when you have the possibility to use brand new features, new platform, etc, etc.....)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-03 07:45 ] |
dephanix
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 188
From: UK
PM |
K750i:
K850i:
T630: 
Vivitar 4000:
 |
dephanix
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 188
From: UK
PM |
T630's contrast actually looks better than both K750 and K850 |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-02 01:54
