| Author |
W900i official. |
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
brick
(have to say this  ) |
|
|
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
Video is amazingly clear for a cellphone, even when played at large size on Quicktime.
Very impressed. 
|
slattery69
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: north east england
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-10-17 16:25:21, Arez wrote:
Quote:
| i did a test on my k750 same pic in phone mem and on card
the phone memory has 32mb spare the card only 6mb spare.
guess what they opened pretty much the same speed maybe a millsec between them music on the card starts at the same speed as in the phone memory. |
|
right. try it browsing lots of 2mb photos, not just one, and specialy animated gifs, and then compare...the difference is not millsec, no way...my k750 almost paralyzes with animated gifs, and with some videos, they start much faster in internal memory
[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-10-17 15:26 ]
|
|
i tried a few pics and there was some lag but not loads. so i tried some animated gifs, the one thats built in labeled svg, always takes time to open and thats in the phone memory so transfered that to the memory stick (made sure there wasnt a copy on the phone) and it seemed just as quick so i did a few others and it didnt grind to a halt was nt as quick but certainly wasnt slow so not sure why were seeing such differnence in performance |
jiteshraj
Joined: May 16, 2005
Posts: 38
PM |
hi guys.here's a few possible reasons for the huge internal memory:
1. dedicated hardware accelerator for games. game files should be pretty large to achieve good graphics. they've included asphalt urban gt 3d which was previously only available @ resolution of 128*160. this processor must be powerful to run it at 320*240.
2. price factor. it's cheaper to include large memory than a mem stick.
3. large cache memory 4 integrated browser.
cheers! |
Chazzer3
Joined: Mar 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Edinburgh, UK
PM, WWW
|
OMG. I'm like totally slurp getting this slurp phone.
|
JT
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 303
From: Birmingham
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-10-17 16:34:12, Super G wrote:
brick
(have to say this )
|
|
Agreed
www.mobileschoice.com - The UK's leading price comparison site for mobile phones. |
leeboy13
Joined: Sep 28, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Brissle - dodgy accients
PM |
Well im gutted now! i havent had my w800 long and with this just around the corner i wish id hung on!
Damn it! Not to worry, i'll just splash the cash i think and get one when they get released!
Nice looking phone and the spec is awesome!
Black for me! |
dr_thug
Joined: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM |
so this phone does not come with a mem card?? |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Magazine Mobil has already tried it out.
http://mobil.mkf.se/ArticlePa[....]/20051017164610_MOB312.dbp.asp
To summarise the content of the short review above:
- Video conferencing works well although the sound was not the best.
- Possibility to take snapshots of the one you are video conferencing with.
- WEB browsing of normal WEB pagest works very well.
- New e-mail client (not tested).
- Possibility to upgrade phone software over air (like GPRS/UMTS) through the phone menu system.
- Kalendern och adsress book same as in previous modells.
- Synchronisation software and USB cable should be provided in the box.
- Camera works as in K750/W800 and is very good.
- Better video recording capabilities (quality wise) although not tested that well in this review.
- WEB TV works great thanks to full screen mode (works equally well with movie trailers etc. as well).
- Remote control is very simple and does not provide much info on the display. Its mainly there to control the media player and provide a radio (part of the remote control).
- Great video gaming processor
- Music player looks the same as the one in W800.
- MS not provided in the box.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2005-10-17 16:33 ] |
dts-phile
Joined: Dec 04, 2004
Posts: 189
PM, WWW
|
Well, nice package indeed !
Yet, 30fps is for sure a great thing, but this is possible on k750 and w800 as they use the same platform ! A simple firmware upgrade and we'll ge 30 fps for our beloved phones...
Will SE do that? let's all hope so !
I think I'll stick mith my k750 for a great while and wait for the next gen' of SE, next year. They'll be way better for sure, with a real integrated hrd drive disc and 3.2 MP at least.
This W900 is relly stuning though, but not relly enough for me... There is a video sample here (posted earlier in this thread):
http://www.se-community.com/~[....]/cam_samples/vids/MOV00002.3gp
Not that much of a revolution... though great ! But I'm sure they'll tweak 3gp (after all, iut's only a codec...) and reach that potential on our k750 and w800...
DTS-PHILE (Nice, France)
The DTS Surround Sound Passion
http://www.dts-phile.com |
spawnweb
Joined: Oct 15, 2005
Posts: 17
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
#dts-phile
Not so sure about them raising videoquality through firmware on K750/W800. W900 may be based on the same platform but propably has a stronger cpu to be able to deal with the higher resolution games, screen, videorecording etc.
Seing as the K750/W800 are allready having problem playing properly encoded 25fps video at more than 180kbit/s video in 176x144, I think its a hardware issue, not a firmware issue. Simply speaking, I think the cpu in K750/W800 isnt powerfull enough for videorecording/playback of similar video as W900, no matter what they do with firmware.
About the integrated harddrive in forthcoming models, I wouldent bet my money on that either, integrated harddrives are much to vulnerable for devices that get tossed around like mobiles, and I dont see that many manufactures or devices going down that road in the near future.
[ This Message was edited by: spawnweb on 2005-10-17 17:06 ] |
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
I've just seen the pics and specs and am still unsure if this is going to be my next phone. The memory is the main advantage to me but the size puts me off as the S700i was a bit big in my opinion and this isnt much smaller.
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Not saying you should get it, but what about its video capabilities ?
Full screen movies and WEB TV on that big bright display is indeed an improvement over S700.
Also, the possibilities to upgrade the software over air (instead of using USB cable) is indeed a nice touch too (remains to be seen how well it works).
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2005-10-17 18:10 ] |
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
Video doesnt bother me. Never really used it on any of my phones.
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
slattery69
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: north east england
PM |
Also, the possibilities to upgrade the software over air (instead of using USB cable) is indeed a nice touch too (remains to be seen how well it works).
it sounds great in theory sadly the cyrrent system isnt without its problems and that should really be straight forward
but none the less a nice touch.
for me its the size of the thing when its open that puts me off, i aint keen on the looks but i do like the specs and i would buy a phone on specs rather than looks, but it looks like a 2 handed job just to send a text or an email and i cant be doing with that.
i would have prefered it touch screen (with just numbers and predictive text ala standard phone keyboards but touch screen) and lost halve the screen when texting and emailing and get full screen back for music and games controlled by the buttons then i would have bought one
[ This Message was edited by: slattery69 on 2005-10-17 18:36 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2005-10-17 16:34
