| Author |
Proudly Nigerian forum |
abubakar
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 109
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
in my rush to respond i 4got to intro:
grew up in a lot of places. read civil engineering at ABU (pls dont be jealous!) who posted he is a gamer? i'm mainly into strategy games but i kick ass in a few beat-em-ups.
|
|
|
abubakar
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 109
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
in my rush to respond i 4got to intro:
grew up in a lot of places. read civil engineering at ABU (pls dont be jealous!) who posted he is a gamer? i'm mainly into strategy games but i kick ass in a few beat-em-ups.
|
coolapostle
Joined: Oct 15, 2004
Posts: 28
From: Abuja, Nigeria
PM |
I hear you Abu.... but I think Iran is inviting trouble.
@Easy... Ok I will not talk about the Gospel of Judas again. Will have to move the discussion elsewhere.
Is ANYONE currently using Vmobile to browse the 'net with their PC? A-N-Y-O-N-E? |
abubakar
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 109
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@uchrik: just for some clarification, which nations do have the "right" to develope nuclear weapons? |
Areafada
Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 6
From: Lagos, Nigeria
PM |
@Abu welcome back then. we missed u and we r still missing aya.
@all, the dalies today has confirmed what i was sayin the supreme leader Ayatollah ali of iran has spoken" will respond to any blow with double the intensity". |
abubakar
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 109
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@coola: its obvious they are looking for trouble. but which nation wasn't looking for trouble when aspiring for nuclear advancements? india? pakistan? n. korea? but how much noise was made about any of them? not much. why? cos they were right at or had crossed the brink of nuclear proliferation. but before i talk too much, let me hope uchrik posts a response. |
uchrik
Joined: Feb 17, 2006
Posts: 3
From: Nigeria
PM |
@Abu,lets be frank with ourselves.We are all aware of what destruction abides in nuclear weapons.You dont want to promote such destruction.There is a treaty:Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT).Any nation that signed this treaty have no right to either develop or transfer nuclear weapons.
[ This Message was edited by: uchrik on 2006-04-27 22:22 ] |
Demmy
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
Posts: 27
From: Lagos, Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-04-27 22:04:52, abubakar wrote:
@uchrik: just for some clarification, which nations do have the "right" to develope nuclear weapons?
|
|
someone should pls respond to abu's question. - which nation? |
Dejitella
Joined: Feb 17, 2006
Posts: 7
PM |
hey y'all how was today? great right !!, coolapostle, im using trhe Vmobile PC browsing to post this, so im using it. as per easydee issue of the natural geographic stories influencing our view of the Holy bible, it is not possible okay, i ve seen so much research and even partake in some to know God's word dont change, only Human beings do. The story is just for us all to see things open mindedly, it doesnt mean i wont read it but it ll change or alter nothing about my believes of Jesus christ or the holy bible.
Then the Iran issue, It looks to the world or may be the Muslim nations that the world is ganging up against them like the word of Osama bin laden, CRUSADE of the west against the Islamic nation but to my understanding its not. Some ll say India, Russia, Uk, Pakistan has nuclear weapon why not Iran but the issue goes beyond that, their is a saying that keep your friends close but your enemy closer, America can not afford the realisation of Iran, their long years enemy possessing such destructive weapon, Imagine a state claiming to be recruitiing suicide bomber worldwide to attack american interest, in case they launch any on her (OFFICIAL TERRORISM), can you trust such state with such dangerous weapon, they will wake one morning and say countries like Nigeria with no military might either fall in line and do their wishes or expect nuclear attack.......we need a regulator like the Americans though they messed up of recent with the Iraq offensive, that later turned out to be unjustified, their is no other alternatives, people shuld forget GEORGE BUSH and his fumbling international politics because America as a nation will live beyond him, and America's role cant be divorced from the world regulator and peace negotiator in which they are. or can you trust the chinese or the Russians, are they better alternatives. |
coolapostle
Joined: Oct 15, 2004
Posts: 28
From: Abuja, Nigeria
PM |
@Deji... ol boy! Pls edit and add spaces/line breaks to your last post to make it more understandable.
Why is Iran saying such scary stuff about Israel? THAT is why they are too dangerous to have Nuclear Weapons. When you threaten your neighbours, you become a bully and nobody wants a bully to have a biiiiiig gun.
[ This Message was edited by: coolapostle on 2006-04-28 15:56 ] |
coolapostle
Joined: Oct 15, 2004
Posts: 28
From: Abuja, Nigeria
PM |
Can someone help me find the post from one of our SA boet a long time ago? He gave us an alternate ip for MTN GPRS which worked. I think it was Alpha001. I have spent an hour wading thru the posts of August 2005 (Posts on page 180 something) but cannot find it.
How do u search for all post by a User in a specific thread? |
Demmy
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
Posts: 27
From: Lagos, Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@Deji, all well said dt is exactly d role of the U.N which iis an fall outv of WW II. Interestingly and Ironically it is thec same America that will be the 1st to disobey the U.N coz of their Big Brother Status. I think what the U.S ougth to do is to give the U.N that is the main regulatory body more support.
@coola, wish u luck in ur new found adventure - (laughs) |
Dejitella
Joined: Feb 17, 2006
Posts: 7
PM |
the hesitation of europe then, of dealing decisively with Germany after the first world war created the monster called Hitler and the holocaust, so that is role the UN is taking now as suggested by demmy. Today Russia, and china are against sanction on iran, that is the hesitation again, they gain from iran purchase of weapons and are reluctant of imposing sanctions on Iran, until the first Iranian nuclear test is conducted on the Indian ocean, the world will still be waiting to settle diplomatically and it ll be too late
This message was posted from a Nokia |
abubakar
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 109
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@deji: been away so long i dont know where to start. maybe with ur last post. u cant seriously be comparin hitler's germany to iran. because iran doesn't recognize israel (which it has a right to), what similarities r there? do you see iranian tanks moving through the middle east? germany had invaded a few nations then the allies reacted. if they reacted to the 1st invasion (was it poland or austria, i 4get) that would have preempted the damage.
|
abubakar
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 109
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@deji: if you where lookin for a similitude to WW2 germany, n. korea would have been more likened. they are not aspiring to make weapons, they all ready have weapons. by the way, by no means i'm i saying every nation should have nuclear weapons (God 4bid naija gets one) but unless you look at it from an unbiased point of view, not the american point of view, if you have a neighbour with nuclear weapons that has also threatened u, what would u do?
[ This Message was edited by: abubakar on 2006-04-29 07:14 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2006-04-27 21:47
