| Author |
Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 discussion |
djin
Joined: Jun 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-10-14 00:36:33, l337h1um wrote:
On 2008-10-13 10:53:22, djin wrote:
hey killer master, get bose IE3(inner ear) headphones, they got high bass, so you wont miss out mega bass.
I did that for my n96, since i was missing mega bass too.
Bose. Meh. Killer Master, what you want is some of these. Or perhaps these. You've never heard of them before? Just because you've never heard of them it doesn't mean that Sony, or even Bose, are better. You have probably never heard of them before because they are usually used by professional musicians. But that doesn't mean that people like us can't have the absolute best sound there is.
Oh, and ignore the Logitech logo. It means nothing. Logitech bought them recently, but Logitech won't be influencing the quality of UE's products at all (unless they are REALLY dumb).
I would personally go with shure, UE are good and coslty as well. Bose is in an ok range with higher bass(in that range), so bass lovers usually like bose sound, and he missed mega bass, and yeah elite,
You should as well know that sony and UE cannot be compared as their target and price are totally different.
Sorry guys for going OT.
Xperia T + N 96 R.I.P Desire  |
|
|
pmcg
Joined: Oct 02, 2008
Posts: 27
PM |
On 2008-10-14 17:36:21, Nitro Fan wrote:I was looking at the X1 blog this morning to see if  have stepped up to the plate and come clean on the RAM situation and they STILL haven't!
They are getting ready for a big launch of the product on 30 September as per their announcement.
Maybe they are busy building a time machine too. |
WhyBe
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Ohio, USA
PM |
128MB for CPU/3D doesn't make any technical sense whatsoever. |
tERRiON
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Posts: 19
PM, WWW
|
Maybe they are busy building a time machine too.
LOL
I hope so, and I hope I can join them because I can't wait to get my hands on the X1, eventhough I'm not a Windows-fanboy...
But what about that 128MB graphics memory!? Why would a phone use this amount of memory just for graphics?
My computer is having a 64MB 3D-graphicscard. Okay, according to today's standards it isn't something you will win the newest games with, but it's good enough to play i.e. Max Payn, Far Cry or Battlefield with an acceptable quality at 1024x768/24bit. Why would somebody put 128MB in a device with 'only' 800x480/16bit!?
In my opinion it doesn't make any sense, only if it is a device made to be played with like a PSP.
|
shamuloco
Joined: Apr 21, 2007
Posts: 17
PM |
But what about that 128MB graphics memory!? Why would a phone use this amount of memory just for graphics?
In my opinion it doesn't make any sense, only if it is a device made to be played with like a PSP.
Maybe they have in minda releasing some "excelent" games for this X1... you never know  ...
That could be an excelent reason and a great excuse  ... |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
the 128MB RAM argument is just pure speculation by those who don't really understand the hardware architecture.
Either X1 has 384MB or 256MB as the total RAM pool, it certainly doesn't have any main RAM dedicated to video. It may or may not have dedicated vram but if it does it will be in a different pool to that of RAM.
|
netnerd
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Posts: 16
From: ATT 1900umts USA
PM |
have any1 open up their X1 to find the 128mb ram chip for GPU?
or it just he said, she said? |
l337h1um
Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 69
PM |
On 2008-10-15 08:04:23, netnerd wrote:
just he said, she said?
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-10-15 08:04:23, netnerd wrote:
have any1 open up their X1 to find the 128mb ram chip for GPU?
or it just he said, she said?
the thread at xda developers a guy had opened it up and can find only one chip.
Actually on that thread quite a few posters are saying that the X1 is very fast in normal operation (ie: not using panels) and that most of the panels aren't too bad with only one or two being real slow.
I'm liking the X1 more and more, I can defo see this being my nextr WM device.
|
mode
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-10-15 08:20:00, max_wedge wrote:
On 2008-10-15 08:04:23, netnerd wrote:
have any1 open up their X1 to find the 128mb ram chip for GPU?
or it just he said, she said?
the thread at xda developers a guy had opened it up and can find only one chip.
Actually on that thread quite a few posters are saying that the X1 is very fast in normal operation (ie: not using panels) and that most of the panels aren't too bad with only one or two being real slow.
I'm liking the X1 more and more, I can defo see this being my nextr WM device.
Which leaves another question, when did the dissection take place?
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC* |
Qramohn
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
Posts: 8
PM |
Anyone know how to get rid of the panels completely? Uninstall is enough?
The panels sucks compared to running Xperia with "spb mobile shell" and "spb pocket plus". And the X-panel button could be mapped for better use..
It's a remarkable difference in response time when not running panels.
Gotta love the phone and all it features, but the panels are poorly implemented and doing more harm than use for users and SE. |
WhyBe
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Ohio, USA
PM |
Why get an X1 then?
[ This Message was edited by: WhyBe on 2008-10-15 08:31 ] |
Qramohn
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
Posts: 8
PM |
On 2008-10-15 09:19:43, WhyBe wrote:
Why get an X1 then?
Well. You don't know before you try and find out yourself, or?
Rest of the phone is just amazing. |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
because of the design, form factor (the curved slide is pretty cool and useful), good specs (okay okay so it doesn't have VGA video, who freakin' cares....  ), 3.5mm jack (many WM have usb mini or 2.5mm), fast processor.
Apparently the orientation change is fast (most WM in my experience are a it laggy at this), and running shells faster than touch Flo I've also heard.
Even the design alone is enough given that the phone is generally on par (or better) with other WM phones spec-wise. If you like the design of the handset (looks and ergonomics) then why not the X1?
|
Maggah
Joined: Jul 08, 2008
Posts: 35
PM |
On 2008-10-15 09:19:43, WhyBe wrote:
Why get an X1 then?
[ This Message was edited by: WhyBe on 2008-10-15 08:31 ]
Cause it's the best looking, smallest, and fastest WM6.1 device with a keyboard. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-10-14 23:24
