Author |
The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2011 |
randomuser Joined: Sep 13, 2011 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2011-11-20 03:14:07, hhlong89 wrote:
On 2011-11-19 16:43:25, hhlong89 wrote:
On 2011-11-19 14:10:29, adsada wrote:
That's what the media calls it though so that has kind of stuck
[ This Message was edited by: adsada on 2011-11-19 13:11 ]
 Sony Ericsson MT18i with CPU 1.4 GHz
Source: sevodoi.blogspot.com
UAProf of Sony Ericsson MT27i, LT26i, LT28at, ST25i
Source: sevodoi.blogspot.com
Cortex A8 CPU. Qualcomm first gen dual core. I really don't understand why is doing this ? Why do they not want to compete with other brands with a true high end model ? Sure this Qualcomm 1st gen dual core CPU will be great in the entry level and mid range devices but its going to be horribly outdated in the Nozomi.
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2011-11-20 04:11 ] |
|
HxH Joined: Dec 26, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: GMT+7 PM |
Every Qualcomm Snapdragon chip is based on Cortex A8 Architecture even Krait 28nm, that's why I start do not like them. Old technology Sell Expensive.
While those competitor using Cortex A9 architecture : ST-Ericsson NovaThor / Nvidia Tegra / Samsung Exynos / TI OMAP 4. Look into these benchmark tests , where Qualcomm had been left in dust. And will be even worse in next year because Samsung might goes for Cortex A7 (IMHO - it could be 2013 model because Samsung already announced Exynos 4212 which is manufactured at 32nm already) recently announced and OMAP 5 is Cortex A15 ready!
http://blog.gsmarena.com/sams[....]rmance-in-ice-cream-sandwich/" TARGET="_blank" rel="nofollow">Refer
[ This Message was edited by: HxH on 2011-11-20 09:59 ] SONY x Sexy x Sleek x Solid x Stunner x Stylish : Nozomi/Kagura with Love. |
SE cz Joined: Jan 10, 2007 Posts: 360 From: Czech Republic PM, WWW
|
Short overview of new UA profiles (2012 portfolio):
LT22i (resolution 960x540 pixels): http://www.sonyericsson.com/5761/UAProf/LT22iR601.xml
LT26i (resolution 1280x720 pixels): http://www.sonyericsson.com/5761/UAProf/LT26iR601.xml
LT28at (resolution 720x1280 pixels): http://www.sonyericsson.com/5761/UAProf/LT28atR601.xml
MT27i (resolution 480x854 pixels): http://www.sonyericsson.com/5761/UAProf/MT27iR601.xml
ST25i (resolution 480x854 pixels): http://www.sonyericsson.com/5761/UAProf/ST25iR601.xml
btw.: note that resolution of display, first number mean width and second one height, as U see there is clear-cut distinction between LT22i+LT26i and the rest. Interesting resolution has LT22i, it is very closely same as PlayStation VITA (960x544).
[ This Message was edited by: SE cz on 2011-11-20 20:10 ] |
kewsvnet Joined: Feb 26, 2007 Posts: 295 From: United Kingdom PM |
so two of the phones are designed to be wide orientation...or they are actually tablets!! was really looking forward to seeing at least one codename to have a K there SK25i or MK27i...would like to have a nice successor for the mini pro! |
lolstebbo Joined: Aug 01, 2009 Posts: 186 From: California PM |
ST25i with an FWVGA screen? Are they moving the Mini up to the Ray's size?!? |
SE cz Joined: Jan 10, 2007 Posts: 360 From: Czech Republic PM, WWW
|
On 2011-11-20 21:44:27, kewsvnet wrote:
so two of the phones are designed to be wide orientation...or they are actually tablets!! was really looking forward to seeing at least one codename to have a K there SK25i or MK27i...would like to have a nice successor for the mini pro!
That note was just only note, becouse in all other profiles it is right (width x height). As U see LT26i is not designed to be wide orientation, it is 720x1280 not 1280x720:

[ This Message was edited by: SE cz on 2011-11-20 21:23 ] |
mustafabay Joined: Sep 27, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Egypt PM |
1280X720 = 720p = resolution of Galaxy Nexus. Why assume tablet?
I don't want a signature anymore. |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
Is this Nozomi still coming out?? Will it be rje last SE device?? Or will it be under Sony name??
Phone?? What phone?? |
smclion102 Joined: Aug 12, 2010 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2011-11-21 02:10:00, Bonovox wrote:
Is this Nozomi still coming out?? Will it be rje last SE device?? Or will it be under Sony name??
50 MORE DAYS FOR CES we will get to know most of the stuff that day Fingers Crossed |
Legen Joined: May 25, 2008 Posts: 469 PM |
On 2011-11-21 11:29:14, smclion102 wrote:
On 2011-11-21 02:10:00, Bonovox wrote:
Is this Nozomi still coming out?? Will it be rje last SE device?? Or will it be under Sony name??
50 MORE DAYS FOR CES  we will get to know most of the stuff that day Fingers Crossed
Sounds so soon when you put it that way |
motvikt Joined: Jun 03, 2009 Posts: > 500 PM |
http://phandroid.com/2011/11/[....]snapdragon-s4-and-qhd-display/
Seriously I understand if HTC gets a phone with krait out on the market faster than SE, but ASUS too? WTF? |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2011-11-21 11:29:14, smclion102 wrote:
On 2011-11-21 02:10:00, Bonovox wrote:
Is this Nozomi still coming out?? Will it be rje last SE device?? Or will it be under Sony name??
50 MORE DAYS FOR CES  we will get to know most of the stuff that day Fingers Crossed
Ok cool
Phone?? What phone?? |
kewsvnet Joined: Feb 26, 2007 Posts: 295 From: United Kingdom PM |
On 2011-11-20 07:10:49, HxH wrote:
Every Qualcomm Snapdragon chip is based on Cortex A8 Architecture even Krait 28nm, that's why I start do not like them. Old technology Sell Expensive.
While those competitor using Cortex A9 architecture : ST-Ericsson NovaThor / Nvidia Tegra / Samsung Exynos / TI OMAP 4. Look into these benchmark tests , where Qualcomm had been left in dust. And will be even worse in next year because Samsung might goes for Cortex A7 (IMHO - it could be 2013 model because Samsung already announced Exynos 4212 which is manufactured at 32nm already) recently announced and OMAP 5 is Cortex A15 ready!
from what I can see krait only uses the cortex-a8 instruction set...not the architecture! infact its architecture is meant to be better than A9 and probably comparable to A15...and considering it is about the only 28nm chipset available currently...should offer pretty good power efficiency...not to mention its cores are asynchronous so it can switch one off if not needed...the only thing that isnt too great is the GPU! so unless u want hardcore gaming it should offer pretty good performance in my opinion. its not always about the number of cores! and also this should improve power efficiency now all I wish is that (sony) use LED for screens which would give even better power efficiency...and the new phones should have much better batt life!!!!
Android Authority
The new S4 is based on a completely new architecture called Krait (more like the jump from Cortex A9 to Cortex A15 than the one from Cortex A8 to Cortex A9) that is also manufactured at the smallest processing node so far for ARM chips–28 nm.
AnandTech
Scorpion was Qualcomm's first Snapdragon CPU architecture. At a high level, it looked very much like an optimized ARM Cortex A8 design although the two had nothing in common outside of instruction set.
Qualcomm lengthened Krait's integer pipeline slightly from 10 stages in Scorpion to 11 stages in Krait. Load/store operations tack on another two cycles and instructions that go through the Neon/VFP path further lengthen the pipe. ARM's Cortex A15 design by comparison features a 15-stage integer pipeline. Qualcomm's design does contain more custom logic than ARM's stock A15, which has typically given it a clock speed advantage. The A15's deeper pipeline should give it a clock speed advantage as well. Whether the two effectively cancel each other out remains to be seen. |
aamwng Joined: Mar 05, 2011 Posts: 195 From: UK PM |
http://www.phonearena.com/new[....]-announced-at-CES-2012_id23938
|
adsada Joined: Aug 23, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Scotland PM |
Hmmm...this could be a very interesting strategy, if in 2012, they have their high end 'new' phones, but also drop the price of their 2011 phones and continue to sell them as mid range or even low end phones?? I could see the cheap one like walkan mix £50, the mini range dropping as far down as £80? the neo/pro around £150 mark and the ray and arc s as £200?
|
|