| Author |
wich cam is better? K700 or 6230? |
jimjam_sweet
Joined: Jun 15, 2004
Posts: 14
PM |
they both take similar quality pics, but bcoz of k700's screen pics look better. more vivid and colorfull |
|
|
kenski
Joined: Aug 15, 2002
Posts: 369
From: Philippines
PM |
The design and menu icons of the k700i look great! The 6230 icons looks like an abstract  also when u buy a 6230 the total memory of k700i still wins. In our country 6230 is more expensive than k700.
 forever Read the FAQ before u post a new topic.. 8810->6150->3310->t68i->t610->t630->k700i  |
vineet_d
Joined: Apr 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: MumBhai
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-01 05:23:26, jimjam_sweet wrote:
they both take similar quality pics, but bcoz of k700's screen pics look better. more vivid and colorfull
|
|
They DON'T take similar quality pics, screen has nothing to do with the image quality....it depends on the camera sensors and the lens ur phone has got. (correct me if i am wrong) K700 has got a superior quality cam as compaired to 6230.
|
thiagobs
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 14
PM |
Can anyone post a peoples pics?
I wanna see quality of pics when it have PEOPLES!
|
icefusion
Joined: Sep 23, 2004
Posts: 13
From: New Delhi
PM |
Well the 6230's cam clearly kills all the color...and the k700i's cam brings them out more clearly.....
But in night mode...nokia wins all the way....
As for making the video recording tim more..
Go to camera >> settings>>and set the recording time to maximum.... |
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-10-01 21:32:21, icefusion wrote:
But in night mode...nokia wins all the way....
|
|
 that because the 6230 has a light obviously 
Trusted Trader: 50Cent (+6, -0)
|
marlonxp
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Somewhere
PM, WWW
|
according to the pics and revies the 6230's night mode is better
wap.marlonhall.com |
$hé®îNghÀm3:16
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 379
PM |
huh??... video better on 6230 then on k700 
pictures and vid the k700 is better as my bro has same one. 6230 better in dark pics! |
marlonxp
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Somewhere
PM, WWW
|
The 6230 video recording is limited.
wap.marlonhall.com |
mario2002
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jeffrey's-Bay ,South Africa
PM, WWW
|
I think it depends on your lifestyl. If you take most of your pics in the pub's ,disco's ,night clubs (like I do) then the nokia is probably better. The other thing is people does not save pictures on their cells but on the pc (cd) so the cells screen quality only means something while capturing. After all the pic is going to be shared. On the other hand the SE is cheaper !I love both :-)
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650 |
thiagobs
Joined: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 14
PM |
can anyone post some pics taken by k700 in night?
Like a Dance Club? or party, or Bar? |
aquila2
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Posts: 99
From: slovakia
PM, WWW
|
nokia 6230 and k700i are on par in terms of picture quality
the pictures above were taken with firmware 3.14/3.15 which are very very bad.
but the latest firmware of nokia 6230 which is 4.28 improved the quality a LOT
here you can see the difference
taken with FW 3.15
taken with FW 4.28
last but not least, k700i is a generation BEHIND nokia 6230 (well except for display)
k700i has soooo many shortcomings, and is so overhyped ...
just to name a few. ridiculously small addressbook with only 510 numbers (not even entries. nokia 3100 can store more number  , you can search throught the addressbook only with one letter (okey it's fine if you have like 10-20 contancts , the calendar is simply a joke, no repeating events (you cannot enter them or edit them), only 6 notes (wow, even nokia 3310 could save 10 items , no expandable memory, no EDGE support, the night mode on nokia 6230 is better even without the led "flash"
and what about the problem with the 1-2 seconds delay
6230 beats k700i anytime |
deathstaruk2
Joined: Sep 12, 2004
Posts: 97
PM |
tht second pic is still crap, my dads got the same firmware as tht second one and the pics still look crap lol, u dont kno wht ur on about |
McKinley
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA
PM |
Where are you mib1800 to comment Nokias technologically edge over SE? I think you have some arguements in here which can't be overlooked.
aguilas2,
Nokia 6230 is far behind in many things but most obvious things are visual and sound part.
No offence but your pictures look like it could have been taken with my T630 in VGA mode with less grain though.   Where the heck is the clearness in those shots?? I have seen better pictures than those taken with 6230. |
riga800
Joined: Oct 08, 2004
Posts: 3
PM |
Sorry for bad english.
Anyway i got 3 phones nokia 6230,3200 and SE K700i and there is one BIG problem with the Nokia phone memory,well i love to play some games when there is nothing to do MMC is a good thing but ON nokia U CANT store games on MMC the only memory for games its 2 MB of phone memory not MMC and that is it ,2 Mb only and other phone memory only! for images,video,mp3 as MMC too only for mp3,images and other things but u cant run apps from it ! and u cant install apps on it.
So thrust me DONT bye Nokia coz this one is like 3200 with FM better TTF + MMC and some more phone memory (and menu is the same as in Nokia 3200!!!!) and the earphones looks like the cheapest pice of plastic sh@t i ever,ever,ever seen.
But one thing is good,nokia does better pictures at night or with low lighting ,50 procent better that SE K700.
[ This Message was edited by: riga800 on 2004-10-08 19:21 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2004-10-01 05:23
forever 
