| Author |
Get Ready to Droool ! Nokia 6670 |
wevek
Joined: Aug 14, 2003
Posts: 126
From: Mumbai, India...
PM |
I agree with methylated_spirit, what's gone wrong with Nokia they are trying to be over innovative with the shapes & coming out with weirdest shapes...
Also I'll add that SE is being under innovative with shapes with the same rectangular box coming again & again, solution send 1/2 SE designers to nokia & vice versa...
|
|
|
Valentiner
Joined: Aug 23, 2004
Posts: 152
PM |
at least at Nokia you can really find a phone that suits your needs, as for SE there are not many phones, so basically you only have 1 or max. 2 posibilities to choose, which is very bad for SE. |
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
Seems like a nice phone  , but not enough to jump ship. 
Tough times don't last, tough people do!
Free Tibet |
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-09-24 01:15:29, Valentiner wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2004-09-23 20:43:16, Leks wrote:
Isnīt it a 7610 with just an other faceplate? 
|
|
I'd wish people would read/think more before they posted. People, this phone will basically distroy SE two important markets: K700i and S700i. This phone has both in one, and more.
Sure it ain't got IRDA. But who in the hell is buying a 500 euros phone and doesn't have a measly 20 euros to by a bluetooth adaptor?! This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard since I layed foot on this forum.
People grow up! Besides P900 and P910, which are however much larger phones, and have crappier cameras, I do no not see any phone better than this.
People buying this phone do it because it's got a 1,3 Mp Camera, External Storage AND Symbian OS.
Look at the upcoming motorolas, sharing the same features. SE is way back in the tech race.
|
|
All those features and still a measly, tiny, undersized, way too small 176x208 screen. Gimme a break. Who wants to watch MP4's with a magnifier? Nobody
Tough times don't last, tough people do!
Free Tibet |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
@residentevil
screen small? take a look at following. in fact series 60 phone have physical display size 40% bigger than K700 and only 15% smaller than S700.
Comparison of screen sizes (by display area) and pixel density per unit area. First value refers to screen size and second refers to pixel density
Using K700 as a base(=100)
=====Comparison=====
SonyE K700 = 100 , 100
Siemen S65 = 130 , 50
Moto E398 = 110 , 90
Nokia 6230 = 78 , 55
Nokia 6600 = 140 , 65
Nokia 7610 = 140 , 65
SamsunE700 = 100 , 55
Sharp GX15 = 110 , 45
SonyE P900 = 270 , 65
Siemen SX1 = 155 , 65
SonyE S700 = 165 , 120 |
blackspot
Joined: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM |
Why are we comparing N6670 to the SEK700?
I also found this figure disturbing:
SonyE P900 = 270, 65
resistance is futile. |
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
I'd buy this one if it's 400$ cuz basiclly the 1MB(NOT 1.3!!) is closer to VGA than to 1.3MB in quality terms. I'd go further with the discussion but most of u don't worth my time..
This message was posted from a T610 |
Yazan24
Joined: May 29, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Finally an intelligent person RESIDENTEVIL pointed out that we dont have to dislike it cause its Nokia.
-Kamikaze-
Esato- The first Biased Sony Ericsson Forums
MP3 Ringtones? Oh yeah Laffen killed them. |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-09-25 09:14:54, blackspot wrote:
Why are we comparing N6670 to the SEK700?
I also found this figure disturbing:
SonyE P900 = 270, 65
|
|
not comparing. just to point out the screen is one of the biggest around for normal non-touch screen.
of course, the bigger the screen the better. i would'nt mind the screen size of P900 but then it cost a bomb. |
aquila2
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Posts: 99
From: slovakia
PM, WWW
|
as it was mentioned many times. this phone is a very decent phone and it is supposed to be around 500 euro, which is not bad price for such a feature packed phone. and you will see it will sell like hot cakes. |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
Quite an interesting thread this, but also very very silly at points too. Far from SE fans attacking Nokia, there seems to be something of an over reaction in this thread by, what I am assuming are, Nokia fans. Personally I don't much care for this particular mobile, not because it is Nokia, but because I don't like the design and because I would rather have a different mobile.
The criticism that has been levelled against this mobile seems to have been, for the most part, constructive and fair. It does seem somewhat odd to post a review of a Nokia product in an SE forum and not expect some criticism of it. For my part I think that this mobile is actually quite good in terms of features and I am sure that it will probably do quite well, but it just isn't for me.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
Burgaz
Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Cwmbranistan, S. Wales
PM, WWW
|
I'd still prefer the 6630.... |
Mrb 18
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: 299
From:
PM |
I agree with many here that spec vise this is an interesting phone, but design vise its horrible.. Nokias are either too extrem or to dull design vise..
And i wonder if this one has fixed the 7610 butt stupid drawback, mono sound??
Power to the people=SAAB turbo |
marlonxp
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Somewhere
PM, WWW
|
nokia phones are always ugly but high in features and not bad prices |
Valentiner
Joined: Aug 23, 2004
Posts: 152
PM |
Quote:
|
All those features and still a measly, tiny, undersized, way too small 176x208 screen. Gimme a break. Who wants to watch MP4's with a magnifier? Nobody
|
|
as I said before "I'd wish people would read/think more before they posted." !!!
but obviously residentevil is part of that category of users who just wants to be into the discussion, having absolutely no idea of what he is talking about.
as our colleague said below, the physical size of the screen of 6670 is larger. IN PLUS, compaired with K700 and S700 (as I said in my quote, please read it) IT CAN USE ALL IT's SCREEN TO DISPLAY MOVIES, UNLIKE k700 or s700.
I have a k700 and it's nice imposible to see a movie on it, whereas on the 6600 you can! The same thing goes with S700 (dispite his huge screen / resolution - the movie is played only in a small window!!).
So please take time to read the reviews, and people, think a little bit before you post, ok?
[ This Message was edited by: Valentiner on 2004-09-26 01:03 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2004-09-24 23:35
