| Author |
T630 and 1000mah batt |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Weird u mention it, i noticed better performance on 30 as on 10, maybe its a better batt.
This message was posted from a T630 |
|
|
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
Well,it might b the fact that the sw is tweaked while mine's older eating up more energy.
This message was posted from a T610 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Strange that the original batt has 770 mah, not 800 or 700. Once batts had 'round' mah like 500, 1200 etc. Think they fill them and measure later the power. Maybe.
This message was posted from a T630 |
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
I guess it's maxed out. That's all they can put in that sleak, slim form of a battery.
" They say i'm sick; they`re right, it's called 'Terminal Boredom!' " Follow me on twitter.com/bogramaRead my Symbian UIQ 3.0 reviews at Juvo's |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Still crap performance. Think i give it to my friend, he can use it as test-batt when he repairs fones.
This message was posted from a T630 |
Asterix
Joined: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Lima / Peru
PM, WWW
|
So sorry to hear you're giving up on it, so finally the 1000mh performance wasn't as good as original 770mh?
T610 Powered |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
No, it was the same or less, it just made me nervous, i give it away now, dont even want to see it. Ps:thx for kindly comments all of u.
This message was posted from a T630 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
I made a test. The orig 770 mah batt lasts 2 days long if no calls and 4h surfing with gprs ( in auto mode )
This message was posted from a T630 |
ovidiugm
Joined: Jun 08, 2003
Posts: 38
From: RO
PM |
The mAh indication of a battery is an indication of its capacity, despite its constructive technology (LiIon, LiPol, NiMh etc). So, the bigger, the better.
BUT some non-original batteries are over-rated (maybe noone cares to check their stickers to persuade the producers to display their real capacity)
Same thing happened to me long time ago, when I bought a very slim battery for my Nokia 6110 (it also had vibration!). Half the depth of the original one, it was rated 1.300 mAh !!! I kept using it just because of its vibration, but the stand-by and talk times were worse than those of its original battery.
As the capacity of the battery cannot be directly measured, I guess you must always be suspicious when you find standard-sized (or even under-sized) batteries with greater-than-standard capacity, from third-party suppliers. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Thx for the great comment. No more non orig batts.
This message was posted from a T630 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Here u are.
This message was posted from a T630 |
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
I'd buy it but here i just found an original one for 10 euros. So it's cheap anyway.
" They say i'm sick; they`re right, it's called 'Terminal Boredom!' " Follow me on twitter.com/bogramaRead my Symbian UIQ 3.0 reviews at Juvo's |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@701 u mean with 770mah? Its cheap, if u need it then go for it.
This message was posted from a T630 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@narsus here u are. Of course u could have more luck.
This message was posted from a T68i |
|
|
Posted: 2004-09-10 21:39
