| Author |
New SE Sucks (Confirmed by releasing P910) |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
To remove the battery just to change the mem card, thats what i call weird... Ps: dont like it, dont buy it. Its so simple.
This message was posted from a T630 |
|
|
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
The MMC slot is the only thing that Nokia "has" on SE. other than that the new phones (reffering to K700 in particular) beat the new nokia in every way (referring to Nokia 6230 & 7600... etc). so the SE phones dont have a MMC, so what? the more than good features of each phone make up for it.
yeah, and having to remove the battery... pain in the ass really, i am happy to live without it 
Twista
Trusted Trader: 50Cent (+6, -0)
|
sebzZ
Joined: Jan 17, 2004
Posts: 50
From: -
PM, WWW
|
well...maybe some of u guys out there may be thinking hat i'm making some childish comments...but true enough, i'm rather dissapointed in SE's latest fones. especially the k700.
ok, let's get back to the old sonyericsson days of the t68i era. compare the nokia's t68i (6610) and the SE's t68i...of course, many of u would have agreed that the 6610 is better than that of the t68i. but come to think of that, the 6610 is produced quite a while later. the 6610 is a t68i WITH RADIO, POLY (although it sux), 128*128 4096 colour screen, Java, etc etc.. the t68i is a revolutionary fone. and the 6610 is more advanced as it's produced much later.
well, i'm going to use the t68i vs 6610 as an analogy to this topic. 6230 is produced later than the k700 and they belong to the same range of phones. i can be sure that sonyericsson knows that their k700 would be facing a tough competition with the 6230. but...they've lost their minds and produced a k700 without an msduo slot. true. the k700 has won hands down with it's UI and stuff's like that. but come to think of it. 41mb. it's just not enough for a phone that can take 1.2mp pictures, video recording, video playback, mp3/aac player, 3d java gaming, etc etc. no one on earth is not greedy. i can be sure that 90% of the k700 users would yearn for a msduo slot in time to come. when u have a one mp3 in ur fone, u'll start thinking of reasons for another mp3. then the 3rd. 4th. 5th. and 6th. now u've got a wonderful 30 mins of mp3 playing. and wat do u realise? u've taken about 24mb of your k700's memory. wait. there are still many other applications on the k700 that will need lots of memory. soon,u'll be getting 'phone memory full messages' on your k700. 2nd. the casing of the k700. it has lost it's aluminium feel found in it's predessor. sad case.  ok, now let's move on to the 6230. 128mb mmc. i've got 25 mp3 songs and a handful of video files. and i'm presently left with 7++mb left for my videos, camera shots and maybe, another mp3 file. the lack of memory expansion is the only factor that prevents a nokia-bugged fella to change to a k700.
yes, the k700 is produced sometime later than the 6230. but...ultimately..where the hell has the expansion slot gone? please..use some sense, SonyEricsson. i hope that this is the last time SonyEricsson is going to make such stupid errors again.
well..i am using a 6230 and my brother owns a k700.
as for y sonyericsson doesnt use MMC but insists on the MSDUO, the reason is clear. it's SONYericsson. not MITSUBISHIericsson, TOSHIBAericsson, etc. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@sebzZ mp, java, radio, cam etc ITS A FONE! I dont buy one cos ms duo or whatever its called. The swiss knife technology isnt for my taste. So pls dont compare fones according fun feaures instead of usefull. Its my short opinion.
This message was posted from a T630 |
bico
Joined: May 19, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden.
PM, WWW
|
A phone is a phone.
All the nice to have functions and features are just nice to have.
What really counts are:
 - good and classical design
- bright and clear display
- intuitive user interface
- durable battery
- light weight
- small size
- lots of communication and connection options
And last, but not least:
- the possibility to make and take calls
- the possibility to send and receive short messages
That's what really counts in the end.
|
mixin
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Notts, UK
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-07-03 07:22:50, Residentevil wrote:
And there are not that many Blokias that have external memery extension, so what is your point?
|
|
I would say that there are no Blokias with extrenal memory. Last time i checked there wasnt a company making anything under the name of Blokia.
|
vanquish
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Wor Newcastle Phone: V600i
PM, WWW
|
I understand that the new is slightly different, but at least have some supportive and valid information gunn!
is by far the best, just look at the blindingly obvious features that are being posted up in this thread!
[addsig] |
sebzZ
Joined: Jan 17, 2004
Posts: 50
From: -
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-07-03 19:48:18, bobafett wrote:
@sebzZ mp, java, radio, cam etc ITS A FONE! I dont buy one cos ms duo or whatever its called. The swiss knife technology isnt for my taste. So pls dont compare fones according fun feaures instead of usefull. Its my short opinion.
This message was posted from a T630
|
|
u sure that u cant compare fones according to fun features? ok. if u're dead sure about this, can you please, provide me a solid reason as to why phone manufacturers put in lots of effort just to be a cut above the rest to come out with colour phones (8310 vs t68i), java-enabled phones (t68i vs 6610), camera fones (t610 vs 6610), vga camera phones (k700 vs 7250i), and now, even megapix camera phones are out.
if you think that FUN FEATURES as you've said arent important at all..then why are they coming up with all this gadgests? why dont Ericsson just stick with it's T10, and blokia to it's 3310?
now, no phones produced are not useful. it depends on the user. FUN FEATURES i reapeat, actually depends on the user. U may be thinking that those things are bullshit to u, but those FUN FEATURES may be very useful to other people.
the msduo need not be used only as a storage for those FUN FEATURES, they can also be used to save word documents and they can be transported to other computers. u call that not-useful? i beg to differ.
as for designs, it's very subjetive and i shan't comment on them. |
korbindallis
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
I totally agree with the fact that nokia dont make a good looking phone they suck at designe case in point 7200 the most useless clamshell phone ever
This message was posted from a T630 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@sebzZ pls read my last sentence in my former post. thx.
|
deuxani
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Amsterdam, Merate, Pula
PM |
The problem here is the absence of MMC or SD for me. MS is so expensive in comparison, that I wouldn't consider to buy a new SE phone anymore in the near future. But I do think it's weird that currently only the (very expensive) P series is the only one with expandable memory. I think the K700 could've been the perfect phone for almost everybody if it had this feature. For many people that is a reason to buy a 6230 for instance. |
slattery69
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: north east england
PM |
i have to say the k700 looks a great phone and i would have bought one but for one thing the lack of expanable memory.
its not a big deal to a lot of people and i could have worked a round it but i didnt want to have to keep tranfering things from my comp all the time
so i ended up getting a n6600 and can honsetly say i am more than happy iwth it
i aint saying its better just its better for me and i beleiev thats how you should buy phones based on your needs not on who makes it |
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
I wasted my time reading the 1st page. This thread will go away just like the useless others ...and i am GLAD! 
" They say i'm sick; they`re right, it's called 'Terminal Boredom!' " Follow me on twitter.com/bogramaRead my Symbian UIQ 3.0 reviews at Juvo's |
wapchimp
Joined: Jun 09, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Land of the chimps
PM, WWW
|
I dissagree. I have opened another can of worms here, and most people have posted very valid & mature responses. If you see the other threads floating around they are full of nokia shit nokia this n that.
I don't expect to change peoples attitudes or opinions, but when people comment on something they have no experience of (eg using a nokia to compare against ) then they can only make an assumsption based on their own preferences.
I have tested the Z1010 & have a T610 and nokia 6600. For me at present the 6600 rules because of its open and very versatile operating system. While not perfect, it is very very good. If have a series 60 3G phone I will drop kick the 6600 and go back. But also, I will probably get the Z1010 as it is a very good phone. It seemed very bug free, even for a test unit, when I was lucky enough tp test it.
[addsig] |
DungeonMaster
Joined: May 06, 2004
Posts: 312
PM |
@orangeman Very nice reply. 6600 is really a great phones, whatever the fanatic users say. But to say the truth it has the good and bad nokia. Good is fast menus and good connectivity. Bad is very low quality polytone speaker and difficult memory card swapping.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
|
|
Posted: 2004-07-03 16:07
ink p800:: 
urple t630:: 
