| Author |
Compare phones and brands ( Previous Title : Why SE is better than Nokia?) |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@payalnik - A handy Coleman flashlight with 12 size D batts will do best in the forest rather than an SE torch! With a Coleman in hand, you can best determine if you are on a 'head-on' collision between a lynx or a jaguar!
[ This Message was edited by: jojo51069 on 2004-05-26 14:02 ] |
|
|
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
I think Nokia is bad from manufacturing and ancient software points of view. It's enough 
" They say i'm sick; they`re right, it's called 'Terminal Boredom!' " Follow me on twitter.com/bogramaRead my Symbian UIQ 3.0 reviews at Juvo's |
nickname88cy
Joined: May 22, 2004
Posts: 77
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-05-26 14:13:44, gforce23 wrote:
@nickname The fifth thing is symbian.
This message was posted from a WAP device
|
|
yes, symbian.. but why k700 and s700 have not? another false thing from se.
|
nickname88cy
Joined: May 22, 2004
Posts: 77
PM |
@McKinley
i dont think nokias has low resolution and bad menu!
|
batesie
Joined: Feb 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
as a whole, they both have their good and bad points, but SE has A LOT more goods points...
This message was posted from a P900 |
gforce23
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Atlanta, London, Dubai
PM |
They might have good resolution but they certainly have bad menus.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
nickname88cy
Joined: May 22, 2004
Posts: 77
PM |
@gforce23
why?
my opinion is that se menus are more easy to (i dont know the word)  |
Payalnik
Joined: Jan 01, 2004
Posts: 380
From: Moscow
PM, WWW
|
@nickname88cy: The resolution of their screens is really way low. 128x128 is worse than t610.
An Apple a day keeps Microsoft away |
McKinley
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA
PM |
nickname88cy
You can compare Sony Ericsson T630 with NOKIA 6230 and you will see some differences.
Nokia just sucks! |
countert610
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 26
PM |
1)  can change themes
2) better design
3) solid build qaulity
4) better price
5) not so many exploding batteries
6) many good functions
7) very good screen resolution
 pc control(yeah)
9) non cracking covers
10) the list is endless on how good , but they also have some bad things, but not as many as nokia |
countert610
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 26
PM |
why did my post not come 
anyway i think there are a lot of reasons that is better than nokia, see nokias cracking covers, exploding batteries, non working Ir, 7610 with no Ir  , same functions, maybe one added and one gone 
see nokias menu its ugly 
are very nice and easy to handle with
|
Jowi
Joined: Feb 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Pilipinas
PM, WWW
|
is not better...its the best! |
countert610
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 26
PM |
there it was |
nickname88cy
Joined: May 22, 2004
Posts: 77
PM |
@Payalnik you cant compae 6100 or 6610 with t610.! |
Payalnik
Joined: Jan 01, 2004
Posts: 380
From: Moscow
PM, WWW
|
@nickname88cy What do you mean? Most of Nokias have small screens. And their smartphones have smaller screens than SE mediaphones.
An Apple a day keeps Microsoft away |
|
|
Posted: 2004-05-26 14:37
