| Author |
Post comments and pictures about/from C702 here |
unlock26
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM |
I have R3BA035 |
|
|
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
Can you post some full sized versions of the pics that you've already taken? I'd like to see what the quality is like. |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-06-13 20:32:15, technical-expert wrote:
I think the pictures are really disappointing.
Although colours look good, its no where sharp and noise, blur and smear free compared to K750, w800, k800
TECHNICAL EXPERT
[ This Message was edited by: technical-expert on 2008-06-13 19:33 ]
You think W800 and K800 have no smears in their images? number1 even said before that the former have some issues with picture softness/blurring, and a K800 with standard camera driver also have issues with Jpeg compression that smears fine details.
The blurry sample picture that iron had posted was probably due to handshake(i even experience it myself) take a look at this water pump pic in full size one the camera photos section here in esato and tell me once more that the pictures are blurry
refer to the link below to see the full size of the above sample
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
@crossmatched: no doubt photo processing of C702 is better than K800/K810 with standard cam driver  for sure Abu Basim here agrees 
10 years at Esato |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
Nice detail imo. Looks like my next phone. |
unlock26
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM |
On 2008-06-14 03:09:06, Radiux399 wrote:
Can you post some full sized versions of the pics that you've already taken? I'd like to see what the quality is like.
As you wish...
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/527/dsc00020yt7.jpg
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/7134/dsc02690xs9.jpg
http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/1931/dsc02695mo4.jpg
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/6413/dsc02697mv3.jpg
http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/1200/dsc02698qw0.jpg
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7896/dsc02692bp2.jpg |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
unlock, some of this full size pics is good (no doubt about that).
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-14 08:40 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-14 08:42 ] |
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Nice pics here. They look even better than the C902.
|
unlock26
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM |
On 2008-06-14 10:08:34, bavlondon2 wrote:
Nice pics here. They look even better than the C902.
Yes,the picture i have seen taken by c902 looks like shit. |
jplacson
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
 I want one! I can't wait for it to be available here in the Philippines!
|
technical-expert
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pacific Rim
PM |
Yes,the picture i have seen taken by c902 looks like shit.
Have to say C702 is no good either
TECHNICAL EXPERT
 K700-  W800- [W810]- W200-[ P990]=[Current]. One expert at esato that never lets u down technical-expert. |
unlock26
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM |
On 2008-06-14 23:05:26, technical-expert wrote:
Yes,the picture i have seen taken by c902 looks like shit.
Have to say C702 is no good either
TECHNICAL EXPERT
Well its still a cellphone and not a digital camera .C702 its ok with the 3.2mp camera i think..im happy with my C702. |
unlock26
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM |
1: Auto 2:i think i used daylight 3+4 macro with auto.
 |
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
This sure looks like a neat phone with a good cam and since it is dust/water proof should'nt give any of the issue's the k8x00 have. Anyone know where to get this baby in the UK ? |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
start getting better. that butterfly picture is sharp & nice.
when release next cam driver, im pretty sure that it will focus even better, (the problem i see on some pics, is the sharpness from the autofocus, but it can be fixed
ps. landscape pics with trees & leafs is really hard to get sharp for a camera. (all millions of leafs moving around needs very good optic & sensor), so thats why example buildings is easier to get sharp. (what i mean is, try some other kind of landscape if you want to see fair quality, example citys, etc)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-15 17:00 ] |
unlock26
Joined: Mar 04, 2004
Posts: 43
From:
PM |
Not all the pictures i took today was good like the latest pictures from me..
For example:
Auto..
Landscape..
 |
|
|
Posted: 2008-06-13 20:39
K700- 
W800- 
