Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > The Sony Ericsson cyber-shot thread

Author The Sony Ericsson cyber-shot thread
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-08-04 15:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
here are some naswers next to the "noise" one

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_photography

and here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_noise
_________________
Aquila non capit muscas-Cand. Mag Mt. S.V.P.E.N. MTL -/// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum

[ This Message was edited by: BobaFett on 2007-08-04 14:47 ]
kotsianis7
K850 Blue
Joined: Jul 21, 2007
Posts: 65
From: THESSALONIKI
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-08-04 16:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I see everyone to complain about K800's photo quality!But,in reality,its quality it's the best in 3.2 megapixels.Also,the amount of features that camera has is also unique.I agree that there are other solutions from Nokia,Samsung etc that are also good but you can't say that they have the features and easy controlling..I'm a SE fan but i'm not offensive about other companies..If a company manufactures something good,i'll recognise it..I think that this logo includes quality,features and ergonomy..

This message was posted from a K810i
KingBooker5
C902 Black
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 16:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I dont know why people complain.

It has amazing quality. Check out the "post pictures from k800/90" thread. Some are spectaculer
NightBlade
Sony Xperia T
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 16:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I agree.
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-08-04 17:11
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
we dont complain here about quality, we discuss the cyber shot feature.... ( see thread title )
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
C905
X1 Silver
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 18:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
some of you guys say that SE uses brands? What about Nokia and Carl Zeiss? They do not use CZ lens , but they buy the right for the name on their cameraphones. SE gives their high-end cybershot xenon light and the walkmans have good easy musicplayers with dedicated buttons.
And about the quality of pictures:
S700 is the best 1.3 megapixels camera.
K750 is the best 2.0 megapixels camera.
K800 is the best 3.2 megapixels camera.
K850 is the best 5.0 megapixels camera.

[ This Message was edited by: k850 successor on 2007-08-04 17:48 ]
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-08-04 18:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
but there is no nokiacarlzeiss joint venture. thats a total different story imo, among cz and nokia. have to admit, that nokia and cz marriage wasnt turned out so well, as cs and se
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
Dups!
BlackBerry Q10
Joined: Sep 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: GMT +2
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 20:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@Boba- I'm a bit puzzled by your assertion. Does the fact that nokia and cz aren't in a joint venture make it okay for nokia use cz's brand name?
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-08-04 20:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i ment more, that sony has a closer connection to se, but sony blames itself, when some se fones are sold as cyber shot technology featured devices, cos next to the cs brand, the devices dont offer cs quality as i see.

donnow how is it at nokia and cz, nokia payed for cz and hoped for a better sale cos of the long and old, worldwide accepted lense technology in their devices or cz wanted to show the world, that they can enter with proud in the mobile techn biz...

anyway, seesm cz did offered the hoped result, cos their mobile pix are very poor ( as i see ) and seems that even se fones make the most developed mobile pix ( as i see ) dont offer better quality with cs feature then k750 and co.
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
NightBlade
Sony Xperia T
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 20:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
OMG, you mean that Nokia phones don't actually have CZ lenses?
Wait till I tell my friend who has a Nokia N73! Hahaha..
KingBooker5
C902 Black
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 21:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-08-04 18:46:42, k850 successor wrote:
some of you guys say that SE uses brands? What about Nokia and Carl Zeiss? They do not use CZ lens , but they buy the right for the name on their cameraphones. SE gives their high-end cybershot xenon light and the walkmans have good easy musicplayers with dedicated buttons.
And about the quality of pictures:
S700 is the best 1.3 megapixels camera.
K750 is the best 2.0 megapixels camera.
K800 is the best 3.2 megapixels camera.
K850 is the best 5.0 megapixels camera.

[ This Message was edited by: k850 successor on 2007-08-04 17:48 ]


Dude, we are due about 5, 5mp phones. So far only one is released, that being the n95.

How the hell can you possibly say the k850 is the best 5mp phone when it hasnt even been released yet?
As good as it is likely to be, it could all be flawed for all you know.

Dont count your chickens until they hatch, mate- also the k800 was shared quality between the d900

[ This Message was edited by: KingBooker5 on 2007-08-04 20:37 ]
KingBooker5
C902 Black
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 21:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-08-04 20:42:35, NightBlade wrote:
OMG, you mean that Nokia phones don't actually have CZ lenses?
Wait till I tell my friend who has a Nokia N73! Hahaha..


To behonest, I dont know where k850suc, got that from.

Either he is right, which I doubt very much. Or he is making up utter nonsence and just saying that to defend SE's dignity
NightBlade
Sony Xperia T
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 21:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-08-04 21:42:29, KingBooker5 wrote:

On 2007-08-04 20:42:35, NightBlade wrote:
OMG, you mean that Nokia phones don't actually have CZ lenses?
Wait till I tell my friend who has a Nokia N73! Hahaha..


To behonest, I dont know where k850suc, got that from.

Either he is right, which I doubt very much. Or he is making up utter nonsence and just saying that to defend SE's dignity


I hope he's right...
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-08-04 21:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
bit off topic, but here it stays clear, that nokia DO uses cz in their fones

http://www.nokia.co.uk/NOKIA_[....]ia/nokia_n90_press_release.pdf

as we all know, n90 was the first fone with it
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
MWEB
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM
Posted: 2007-08-04 22:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
BTW Booker old son, the LG K920 (5mp) got there WAY before the N95, it's pretty dire though.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi