| Author |
Best Video Encoder for your SE Phone? |
ares
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
M3 High Quality setting all the way (25fps, 500kbs, 96kbs aac)
in a word: brilliant
SE w880 + Iphone 4 16gb |
|
|
jj03
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-12-20 16:32:20, shery wrote:
how 2 convert full lenghth movies.one dvd takes about 800mb and i have a gig card with 300 mb does that mean only one movie can be put in a phone at a time.
btw does k800i support 352*288.
|
|
Well, the n73 can support 352 x 288, so the k800 should be able too... |
Sirhackalot
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Posts: 463
From: Bermuda, Uk
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-01-05 22:53:48, jj03 wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-12-20 16:32:20, shery wrote:
how 2 convert full lenghth movies.one dvd takes about 800mb and i have a gig card with 300 mb does that mean only one movie can be put in a phone at a time.
btw does k800i support 352*288.
|
|
Well, the n73 can support 352 x 288, so the k800 should be able too...
|
|
No it dosen't support any resolution above 320*240. |
dj christian
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 23
From: Sweden
PM |
Just use M3, ive used SUPER but it makes far less as good quality than M3. |
Mano Khan
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
Posts: 50
From: Karachi,Jeddah
PM, WWW
|
Actually i need a converter Which should convert the whole video ... Because the converter i have converts 25 percent of the movie . |
aqualung
Joined: Dec 02, 2005
Posts: 175
PM |
Can anyone recommend a video encoder that runs on Mac, and will encode videos for P990i?
Thanks  |
Oco
Joined: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lima, Peru
PM |
Super is just... super. M3? good but who need 2 apps (.net) when only 1 do the job?
---------
I  n  |
aqualung
Joined: Dec 02, 2005
Posts: 175
PM |
Super only runs under Windows according to their website... |
blunden
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Posts: 207
From: Sweden
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2007-01-07 07:49:27, Oco wrote:
Super is just... super. M3? good but who need 2 apps (.net) when only 1 do the job?
---------
I n
|
|
If it gives me the best quality, like M3 does compared to many converters, free or not, installing .net isn't really a problem since some other apps need it as well. M3 also doesn't install a lot of codecs on your system unlike many other converters. It keeps it's own codecs and uses the ones you have already if it's a strange format. The fact that it's GUI is very easy and that it even has support for subs makes it superior in my opinion.
However, it doesn't hurt to experiment with others as well to find your own favourite. |
dj christian
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 23
From: Sweden
PM |
Quote:
| If it gives me the best quality, like M3 does compared to many converters, free or not, installing .net isn't really a problem since some other apps need it as well. M3 also doesn't install a lot of codecs on your system unlike many other converters. It keeps it's own codecs and uses the ones you have already if it's a strange format. The fact that it's GUI is very easy and that it even has support for subs makes it superior in my opinion.
However, it doesn't hurt to experiment with others as well to find your own favourite. |
|
Well if you want simplicity just use M3.
[ This Message was edited by: dj christian on 2007-01-10 13:48 ] |
mysh
Joined: Dec 04, 2005
Posts: 176
PM |
I've just noticed this thread, it's nice to see M3 compares so well against all the other converter software.
|
Oco
Joined: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lima, Peru
PM |
Here we got M3 dev man. Plz dont misunderstand my view, Im really pleased with every new app/tool made by great ppl like you 
Its just I found Super quite hard to beat (simple n with many options) and in other hands I keep my PC "light" (dont use .net... indeed hardly use java n flash only because of their massive use in web sites). About number of codecs, c'mon if we use windows n deal with videos we MUST have several codecs inthere.
----------
I n
|
mysh
Joined: Dec 04, 2005
Posts: 176
PM |
That's fair enough, some people do prefer Super.
Personally i don't think it gets the same quality for the same bitrates though. On as mobile phone you want maximum quality for a given bitrate, as bitrate itself is the limiting factor on most phones. They can only decode so much data per second.
I can't understand the hostility toward .net from a few people. It doesn't use any extra memory really, perhaps one or two MB compared to straight win32 c++ or vb. It also doesn't run in the background all the time, it's basically a bunch of dlls that apps can link against at runtime. It's just like installing directx, just a bunch of extra dlls for some software to use. It's certainly not as bad as java!
It's really not true that you need to install dozens of codecs, as super does. I find i can play any video file using a couple of directshow splitters and ffdshow. That's a much 'lighter' solution than installing so many different codecs, much less bloat or complications/conflictions.
One of the fastest ways to break a windows installation is to install one of those big codec-packs like k-lite. hehe. |
wolf
Joined: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 13
PM |
hi!
i've tried installing the m3 but everytime it ask me about the nero EULA thing it just hangs. what could be the problem. i already installed the .net 1, 2 and 3.
thanks! |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
try installing the latest java engine... eerr whatever that is.
or try installing the latest flash player....
ciao!
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..." |
|
|
Posted: 2007-01-04 19:26
