| Author |
Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905 |
Bialynia
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Posts: 337
PM |
Kallegod, did you set your white balance to cloudy or where you just shooting on auto? |
|
|
fullforce
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Linköping Castle
STAR TREK RULES!
HEY; BRING ON THE ROMULAN ALE! |
kallegod
Joined: Jul 02, 2004
Posts: 143
PM |
On 2008-11-07 17:57:09, Bialynia wrote:
Kallegod, did you set your white balance to cloudy or where you just shooting on auto?
Today I only used auto. The weather was quite cold and windy, not so nice to have thingers out of gloves any longer times. So I did not experiment with whitebalances.
|
walgman
Joined: Nov 02, 2008
Posts: 54
PM |
A proper F*cking camera! This aint got no pixels!
[ This Message was edited by: walgman on 2008-11-08 01:43 ] |
Digelius
Joined: May 29, 2005
Posts: 25
PM |
 |
daviep
Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: bonnie scotland
PM |
my spongebob birthday cake
 |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
 |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
These photos are looking better all the time!!!!! |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
Superb indoor Macro Flash Quality:
And the difference in quality of 3mp, 5mp and 8mp photographs:
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
You misunderstood the point i was trying to make,
See how the N82 was added in this 8mp photo comparasion
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=176663
thats the point i was trying to make, the megapixel count doesn't matter the n82 actually took more detailed pics on some occassions.
|
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
Because it has excellent optics, I know. But you said regarding 3mp and 8mp pictures:
On 2008-11-06 13:20:37, number1 wrote:
but a fullsized 8mp & 3mp apart from the 8mp being bigger, details would be the same
That makes no sense. It just makes the same picture bigger, and with the same level of detail?
If you take a higher resolution picture of the same object, you will capture more detail. Thats what High Resolution means. With the picture viewed at the same size, as above, you can see the difference in detail with a high resolution picture.
Why produce higher MP cameras if resolution makes no difference to levels of detail? If the picture is bigger, it has to have more detail to make the image viewable, otherwise it would be distorted.
With the N82, you have a Cameraphone with much better optics than most of its competition. High resolution pictures with poor optics will equal lower levels of detail obviously, but with all things being equal between two cameras, the resolution will make a massive difference in quality of detail.
On 2008-11-06 13:44:10, number1 wrote:
with camPHONES the 3mp would have the better details.
From the examples above, you can see that isn't the case at all. The details captured in 3mp resolution are poor compared to 8mp resolution.
_________________
My Flickr Pics!
[ This Message was edited by: marty mcfly on 2008-11-08 15:52 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
here you have a BIG camera test (allready post i think)...anyway..its good test.
http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]son-Q4-2008-review-r_2039.html
Renoir is the winner there after seen all pics, (if you eject the Canon, because its no cellphone). C905 its the winner on flash though.
edit..Number1...you right...just watch ex, Sony Cybershoot DSC-T1 (5 m.p), its still one of the best small digi cams just because of its superior quality sensor & optic..
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-08 16:05 ] |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
Yes, thread dedicated to it already:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=176663&start=0
The point here is that Number1 never once said anything about optics, which I agree is the single most important thing in determining photo quality. He just said 3mp and 8mp photos are the same, but different sizes, which is totally wrong.
|
kallegod
Joined: Jul 02, 2004
Posts: 143
PM |
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2008-11-08 17:06:54, marty mcfly wrote:
Yes, thread dedicated to it already:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=176663&start=0
The point here is that Number1 never once said anything about optics, which I agree is the single most important thing in determining photo quality. He just said 3mp and 8mp photos are the same, but different sizes, which is totally wrong.
It's no good just taking 3 different pics in different resolutions with the same phone, the phone has 8mp loaded on it's sensor so every signal pic you take is always at 8mp the phone then uses it sofware to resize it, a deadicated 3mp camphone would have just as much detail as a 8mp or probley more as less noise reduction is needed because the sensor isn't as overloaded. The s700 took more detailed pics than my C702 and thats only 1megapixel but the ccd sensor/optics made all the difference.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-11-07 17:57
