| Author |
Xperia Z Officially Announced |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-01-16 04:03:00, randomuser wrote:
Guys, why are judging the Z based on old prototypes 
Wait for the final retail models, then if you feel the screen is bad or camera is bad we can criticize it the whole year 
Old prototypes? Same story every year with Sony. Camera under performs and the displays have minor issues.
I always read the same excuse: " lets wait for the production units they might be better".
I don't think that there will be any difference between the prototypes and the final product. |
|
|
Shino03
Joined: Dec 22, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
I daresay I agree but nonetheless I'll still wait for the gsmarena preview at least. |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
On 2013-01-16 04:43:02, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-01-16 04:03:00, randomuser wrote:
Guys, why are judging the Z based on old prototypes
Wait for the final retail models, then if you feel the screen is bad or camera is bad we can criticize it the whole year
Old prototypes? Same story every year with Sony. Camera under performs and the displays have minor issues.
I always read the same excuse: " lets wait for the production units they might be better".
I don't think that there will be any difference between the prototypes and the final product.
Same story with idiots shouting about nonexisting problems.
Like the T when one guy had a faulty handset and made the dramatic story how bad T screen is.
I had both S and T is better and renders pictures better but there were still whiners claiming the opposite.
Those above shots show exactly the case - Z is much more detailed and shows the background when Nokia doesn't.
The same with the screen - the comparison counts with similar pic, not the different one.
Z probably has similar screen tech as T which means the phone adjusts the contrast according to situation
preserving the battery.
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2013-01-16 09:00 ] a w a r e |
badassmam
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Trust me, the screen looks amazing so when it comes to your local stores go check it out because there is nothing as nice as the Z in terms of screen....to fairly judge screens you need to have the same wallpaper, same level of brightness etc. |
thejosetree
Joined: Sep 07, 2012
Posts: 59
PM |
+1 DACHA
@doministry
My Xperia T was not faulty. I've seen many XT after and all of them has exactly the same screen as mine.
You yourself have seen the problem with the different type of screens on XTX.
I'm tired of discussing that. If you think that Sony's display are the best on market it's fine for me, but don't underrate other opinions please.
by the way, the contrast does not have anything to do with battery. |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
On 2013-01-16 10:17:43, thejosetree wrote:
+1 DACHA
@doministry
My Xperia T was not faulty. I've seen many XT after and all of them has exactly the same screen as mine.
You yourself have seen the problem with the different type of screens on XTX.
I'm tired of discussing that. If you think that Sony's display are the best on market it's fine for me, but don't underrate other opinions please.
by the way, the contrast does not have anything to do with battery.
Yes it does. It's been proven.
Underrate? Yes I underrate claiming that a faulty thing speaks for the whole device.
Maybe it was you maybe not, but on xda there has been a huge thread with the faulty handset pictured
as an evidence.
a w a r e |
Platia1
Joined: Dec 14, 2008
Posts: 242
PM |
Looks like both the Xperia Z and the Xperia ZL will have support for MirrorLink, they have both been approved under the MirrorLink 1.0.2 standard as of December last year.
Of course it comes at a time when I'm considering getting a new car, and what new car comes with a DIN slot :-/ |
smclion102
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
 |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
I would like to formerly say sorry to the forum members here on Esato for my slagging off of Sony & that I was not a fan of the Xperia Z. I won't rant on again & also today I have had the birthday surprise of winning a brand new Xperia T  I entered into a competition weeks ago in a mag and I won!!!!!!!!!!!  I absolutely love it's gorgeous!!!!!
Phone?? What phone?? |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
On 2013-01-16 14:42:13, Sean72 wrote:
I would like to formerly say sorry to the forum members here on Esato for my slagging off of Sony & that I was not a fan of the Xperia Z. I won't rant on again & also today I have had the birthday surprise of winning a brand new Xperia T I entered into a competition weeks ago in a mag and I won!!!!!!!!!!! I absolutely love it's gorgeous!!!!!
Are you kidding 
a w a r e |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Nope. I entered a magazine weeks ago to win one,had a phone call this morning to tell me it was on it's way!!!!!!!!!! I was shaking 
Phone?? What phone?? |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
That's cool since T is really worth every penny.
a w a r e |
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
Congratulations Sean |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-01-16 09:58:39, doministry wrote:
On 2013-01-16 04:43:02, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-01-16 04:03:00, randomuser wrote:
Guys, why are judging the Z based on old prototypes
Wait for the final retail models, then if you feel the screen is bad or camera is bad we can criticize it the whole year
Old prototypes? Same story every year with Sony. Camera under performs and the displays have minor issues.
I always read the same excuse: " lets wait for the production units they might be better".
I don't think that there will be any difference between the prototypes and the final product.
Same story with idiots shouting about nonexisting problems.
Like the T when one guy had a faulty handset and made the dramatic story how bad T screen is.
I had both S and T is better and renders pictures better but there were still whiners claiming the opposite.
Those above shots show exactly the case - Z is much more detailed and shows the background when Nokia doesn't.
The same with the screen - the comparison counts with similar pic, not the different one.
Z probably has similar screen tech as T which means the phone adjusts the contrast according to situation
preserving the battery.
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2013-01-16 09:00 ]
Idiot, you need to learn to respect the opinion of others.
I am just posting facts not making stuff up.
I am still going to get the ZL, I was just expecting more from Sony this time around. The first true Sony phones that sill got some  genes in them. |
doministry
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: PL
PM, WWW
|
On 2013-01-16 15:36:30, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-01-16 09:58:39, doministry wrote:
On 2013-01-16 04:43:02, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-01-16 04:03:00, randomuser wrote:
Guys, why are judging the Z based on old prototypes
Wait for the final retail models, then if you feel the screen is bad or camera is bad we can criticize it the whole year
Old prototypes? Same story every year with Sony. Camera under performs and the displays have minor issues.
I always read the same excuse: " lets wait for the production units they might be better".
I don't think that there will be any difference between the prototypes and the final product.
Same story with idiots shouting about nonexisting problems.
Like the T when one guy had a faulty handset and made the dramatic story how bad T screen is.
I had both S and T is better and renders pictures better but there were still whiners claiming the opposite.
Those above shots show exactly the case - Z is much more detailed and shows the background when Nokia doesn't.
The same with the screen - the comparison counts with similar pic, not the different one.
Z probably has similar screen tech as T which means the phone adjusts the contrast according to situation
preserving the battery.
[ This Message was edited by: doministry on 2013-01-16 09:00 ]
Idiot, you need to learn to respect the opinion of others.
I am just posting facts not making stuff up.
I am still going to get the ZL, I was just expecting more from Sony this time around. The first true Sony phones that sill got some genes in them.
Opinions yes. But whining and whining is something different.
a w a r e |
|
|
Posted: 2013-01-16 04:43
