| Author |
Sony Xperia S thread |
marcink
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: 121
PM |
They're again made to look good on the screen/ bad on 100% crops. Wish they gave some options concerning sharpening levels. Doministry and others will keep saying, that they look so good, but I don't see any progress since satio days. Well, on the other hand, camera quality tends to be less and less important these days and think this will beat lg's and Htc's flagships in camera dept. Personally I just much much more prefer natural output of phones like SGSII and N8, and as a current Neo 8mpix user, it's average camera performance is the reason to go for something else in 2Q 2012. |
|
|
idumbakumar
Joined: Oct 01, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: chennai,india.
PM |
what's the significance of the piece of bottom part below the transparent lines? its simply adds extra size to the phone. I really don't like that part, which makes the phone bigger. is that removable??
[ This Message was edited by: idumbakumar on 2012-02-13 04:36 ] |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
It isn't removable and probably has some components inside of it, most likely to do with various wireless radios and antennae. Otherwise it wouldn't be there, duh.
|
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
Xperia S vs Nokia N8 camera shootout 
http://blog.dialaphone.co.uk/[....]on-sony-xperia-s-vs-nokia-n8/t !
+ video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BpMQ9DraHY
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2012-02-13 11:21 ] |
idumbakumar
Joined: Oct 01, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: chennai,india.
PM |
On 2012-02-13 05:51:34, NightBlade wrote:
It isn't removable and probably has some components inside of it, most likely to do with various wireless radios and antennae. Otherwise it wouldn't be there, duh.
ya even i thought there should be some components inside but as there's transparent block,i still have a doubt on that. |
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-13 14:57:30, idumbakumar wrote:
On 2012-02-13 05:51:34, NightBlade wrote:
It isn't removable and probably has some components inside of it, most likely to do with various wireless radios and antennae. Otherwise it wouldn't be there, duh.
ya even i thought there should be some components inside but as there's transparent block,i still have a doubt on that.
It has the antennae components inside it. And you can actually see the components if you look closely.
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2012-02-13 14:22 ] |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
This visible antenna thing is gonna be the iPhone 4 all over again
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!  ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
DACHA
Joined: May 17, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-13 15:31:36, mriley wrote:
This visible antenna thing is gonna be the iPhone 4 all over again
No it will not. Glass is not electrically conductive like the metal body of the iPhone 4 is.
[ This Message was edited by: DACHA on 2012-02-13 14:48 ] |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2012-02-12 21:42:40, marcink wrote:
They\\\\\\'re again made to look good on the screen/ bad on 100% crops. Wish they gave some options concerning sharpening levels. Doministry and others will keep saying, that they look so good, but I don\\\\\\'t see any progress since satio days. Well, on the other hand, camera quality tends to be less and less important these days and think this will beat lg\\\\\\'s and Htc\\\\\\'s flagships in camera dept. Personally I just much much more prefer natural output of phones like SGSII and N8, and as a current Neo 8mpix user, it\\\\\\'s average camera performance is the reason to go for something else in 2Q 2012.
|
|
How can you say camera quality is less important when they slap on 12 meg camera with so called HD video quality?? Advertising it as Exmor great in low light which it can be in the right photographers hands. If photography was less important now with manufacturers then they'd put on a 3 or 5 meg camera. I think for many people smartphone cameras are becoming more important and it reflects this in the recent decline in sales of digital cameras.
_________________
Material things don't matter,but Rock n Roll does!!!![ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-02-13 15:36 ] |
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
Why nobody commented on the Xperia S beating N8 in the shootout by dialaphone ?  |
motvikt
Joined: Jun 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2012-02-13 16:38:40, randomuser wrote:
Why nobody commented on the Xperia S beating N8 in the shootout by dialaphone ?
Believe it when I see a respectable tester  |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
randomuser
Reading many of the comments above i'd say the reason is because the people here know exactly what they want out of their phone camera, and one little review wont change that.
motvikt
+1, exactly.
[ This Message was edited by: Tsepz_GP on 2012-02-13 15:51 ] Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
I never commented as the link never loaded the photos on my phone will look later on pc
Phone?? What phone?? |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sorry but a You Tube camera review by Dialaphone is not conclusive
Phone?? What phone?? |
rickster2kuk
Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Southampton, UK
PM |
Samples were also way too small to judge on. |
|
|
Posted: 2012-02-12 21:42
