| Author |
Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
@679
finding of gamma correction register can be another "big step". standard gamma setting is pity - take snapshot and final result will be brighter than before this what you have see on viewfinder before snapshot, black color is far from black and so on...
from the logical point of view gamma reg should be near brightness, contrast, saturation but take a look at "Figure 1 Block Diagram":
white balance
gamma
synchro
sharpening
look at periodic table by ChengRong... as for me gamma is somewhere between reg 12 and 20
SPU what do you think about all of this?
unfortunatly i have big J2ME project now on my head and i have no time to search 
BTW. 57 = hue, 59 = unknown (no effect, checked by Kriomag)
_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8469432@N06/
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-06-22 10:50 ] |
|
|
679
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Posts: 174
PM |
On 2007-06-22 11:29:58, Raiderski wrote:
@679
...
...
...
BTW. 57 = hue, 59 = unknown (no effect, checked by Kriomag)
I hope this is CMD 59, coz Kriomag was looking for VIVID picture, and may be miss changing in gamma on pictures with CMD 59 value changing... |
679
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Posts: 174
PM |
On 2007-06-22 12:14:24, 679 wrote:
On 2007-06-22 11:29:58, Raiderski wrote:
@679
...
...
...
BTW. 57 = hue, 59 = unknown (no effect, checked by Kriomag)
I hope this is CMD 59, coz Kriomag was looking for VIVID picture, and may be miss changing in gamma on pictures with CMD 59 value changing...
No, i changed value in CMD59 from 0 till 6 and no changes . Kriomag was right. Its a pitty |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
try bigger values from 00 to FF
|
radicalgel
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 98
PM, WWW
|
@SPU
hey i jus checked out the photos i took with an exif viewer.
when i took photos with the follow methods and
arrived at the following results:
1) first i locked ae, then went into supermode the set iso to 100 (i.e.1.1) then adjusted manual shutter. with this method i got pics with heavy noise and iso levels much higher than 100.
1) first i entered supremode, then i locked ae, then set iso to 100 (i.e.1.1) then adjusted manual shutter. with this method i got really good noise free pics but all pics were iso 80.
can u please tell me why the pics were iso 80 when i chose iso 100?
also when i set iso to 100 i had to increased the shutter speed to the slowest setting (i.e. 4.0) to get a well exposed indoor pics. why is this?
thanks!
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/radicalgel/ |
679
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Posts: 174
PM |
On 2007-06-22 13:30:03, Raiderski wrote:
try bigger values from 00 to FF
Ah, no... The set FF, 80, 40, 20, 10 also does not affect... |
massgeorge
Joined: Mar 15, 2007
Posts: 25
PM |
@SPU
I tried your drivers 1.3 beta 5 to 1.3 beta 7 on my w810i R4ea031, and with these drivers my MXE-60 flash doesn't sync with the camera ( the flash goes off but the picture is dark).
I know you don't have a MXE-60 and therefore can't test it but I was wondering if you might know what changes between Beta 3 which works fine and beta 5-7 in which the flash doesn't work properly my cause this behavior.
I went back to beta 3 for now 
Take Care
PS I love the layout of your driver, I learn so much reading/modding it
Rogers network black w810i |
amarsidhu
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
Posts: 361
PM |
why i can not upload camera driver more than 30kb in my CID 49 RED K750
earlier i was able to do this
plz reply soon i am going bonkers
i have to upload sarmad's 5.7 |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
massgeorge
I'll fix it today in the next version.
W800i CID36 R1BD001 |
DarKMaGiCiaN
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
back again ^_^
sorry I was away for long time
any way I reseved lots of msgs asking for the driver that I'm using.
befor I upload the driver I want to say that :
1. the pics which I uploaded before was my best pic and the quality of the pic was because of the angle and the setting - I have some of the same view with noise and the red lines -
2. i'm not moderator but i have a small background of the this camera driver driver - i just mixed the lines -
3.there are lots of un nessesary lines and i'm sure that you'll fine lots of codes error
4. at first I deside to not upload the cameradriver because I feel happy with it and you may not
5. I got great shot specially with the vivid
6. some crash will happen in w800 and k750 because of the big size - the biggest size I had was 608kb in my k750 cid 36
7. the dirver is mixed of more than 5 cameradriver ;o)
8. here is the link ^_^
http://www.rogepost.com/n/6315300201
it based on K 21.9 cameradriver
[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2007-06-22 19:36 ] |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
1.3 beta 8
1. Disabled bilinear filtering for 1623x1224 resolution (sharper image)
2. Normal focus now 00 instead of 01.
3. Introduced frameskipping settings for video modes in config
4. MXE sync settings restored (not tested)
plain: http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver0.dat
rar: http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver_spu_1_3_b8.rar
zip: http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver_spu_1_3_b8.zip
W800i CID36 R1BD001 |
amarsidhu
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
Posts: 361
PM |
hi guys sorry for the trouble
but i have tried everything but i am not able to put camera drivers in the phone those are more than 28kb, and i want to put sarmad 5.7.
i got to know what i should remove everything which is after // in the driver file. I did that but the file size of sarmad 5.7 driver is still 29kb.
i tried moving drivers to others by sliding the main firmware with the moving drivers patch. but its not working
my phone is k750 CID 46 RED
Please help frnds. its been almost 7 hours of continuous trying.
[ This Message was edited by: amarsidhu on 2007-06-22 20:13 ] |
amarsidhu
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
Posts: 361
PM |
On 2007-06-22 20:27:55, DarKMaGiCiaN wrote:
back again ^_^
sorry I was away for long time
any way I reseved lots of msgs asking for the driver that I'm using.
befor I upload the driver I want to say that :
1. the pics which I uploaded before was my best pic and the quality of the pic was because of the angle and the setting - I have some of the same view with noise and the red lines -
2. i'm not moderator but i have a small background of the this camera driver driver - i just mixed the lines -
3.there are lots of un nessesary lines and i'm sure that you'll fine lots of codes error
4. at first I deside to not upload the cameradriver because I feel happy with it and you may not
5. I got great shot specially with the vivid
6. some crash will happen in w800 and k750 because of the big size - the biggest size I had was 608kb in my k750 cid 36
7. the dirver is mixed of more than 5 cameradriver ;o)
8. here is the link ^_^
http://www.rogepost.com/n/6315300201
it based on K 21.9 cameradriver
[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2007-06-22 19:36 ]
@darkmagician; any instruction about how the user can use this driver at the best
[ This Message was edited by: amarsidhu on 2007-06-22 20:30 ]
[ This Message was edited by: amarsidhu on 2007-06-23 06:25 ] |
DarKMaGiCiaN
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
@amarsidhu
it is as same as K 21.9 with vivid ^_^ |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
SPU
i think this turn off low-pass filter. if yes then we can ofcourse consider better sharpness/more details as advantage but to be fair we should say that there are many disadvantages also especially on low resolution (below 3mpx):
1. no noise filtering (more grain)
2. "moira" and "stairstep" effects
3. jagged edges
4. stronger chromatic aberration
i will try this in my driver tomorrow...
cheers
|
|
|
Posted: 2007-06-22 11:29
