Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750

Previous  123 ... 276277278 ... 307308309  Next
Author Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 11:23
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
DEFAULT SETTINGS FINE MODE ALL AUTO RAW DATA

V5.3 ORIGINAL 459KB

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/7017/dsc05961gr4.jpg

V30.1 573KB

http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/8707/dsc05962bp8.jpg

V7.8 590KB

http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/7048/dsc05963dr5.jpg


AUTOCOLOR FROM ADOBE PHOTOSHOP FOR V5.3 462KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/6304/dsc05961editedog6.jpg
imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 11:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 11:05:21, 2uk3y wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 10:02:04, imsje wrote:
Please , try change this second line to 5d
and then make picture. this is from 94% to 93%

seq_set_prop_5_1=$z0 $p1 0e
$s2 5e //put here 5d instead of 5e


i already change that value, still crash when take same pic like above !!!




it is a pitty that we have to go down with JPEG compression.

5.3 use 55h 85%
30.1 5bh 91%
7.30 5ah 90%
7.8 5eh 94%

choose 5bh or 5ch and try.

cheers
imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 11:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 11:12:23, RENOSJ wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:34:36, Mark_Q wrote:
RENOSJ

Please give us full size originals. Thanks. What was your light source? Incandescent household lightbulb? Halogen? Fluorescent? Normal or night mode? The noise og resised samples point to normal mode, if so then the noise... and color fine tuning = mission impossible...



Hi,

I used normal mode(not night), fine quality, i shot the pictures at night in the room where was lightbulb. I didnt use flashlight on mobile. Pictures are not resized, they are croped.



RENOSJ,

what did you exactly change in the driver , please?
RENOSJ
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 14
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 11:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 11:45:26, imsje wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 11:12:23, RENOSJ wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:34:36, Mark_Q wrote:
RENOSJ

Please give us full size originals. Thanks. What was your light source? Incandescent household lightbulb? Halogen? Fluorescent? Normal or night mode? The noise og resised samples point to normal mode, if so then the noise... and color fine tuning = mission impossible...



Hi,

I used normal mode(not night), fine quality, i shot the pictures at night in the room where was lightbulb. I didnt use flashlight on mobile. Pictures are not resized, they are croped.



RENOSJ,

what did you exactly change in the driver , please?



Hi,

I changed this: from30.1 I gave to 7.8

30.1
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0a 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 1e $s0 01;

7.8
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 07 $s0 07;
Mark_Q
K750
Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 138
From: Helsinki, Finland
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 11:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 11:39:40, imsje wrote:
it is a pitty that we have to go down with JPEG compression.



imsje,

No need to worry as on this level of JPEG compression (around 90%) the visual difference is not big deal - and file size in KB's should not be any goal itself anyway.

Have you realized how the high quality setting affects exposure with MXE-60 flash? I operated first with 92%, but then only short distance subjects got the flash to fire. Please do some experments you too to notice this liimiting issue.

The limited dynamic range of the tiny CMOS sensor and the optical performance of the less than superious camera lens (as the careness of the photographer in terms of settings = exposure compensation etc) are the more dominating limitations ...
imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 12:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 11:57:00, Mark_Q wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 11:39:40, imsje wrote:
it is a pitty that we have to go down with JPEG compression.



imsje,

No need to worry as on this level of JPEG compression (around 90%) the visual difference is not big deal - and file size in KB's should not be any goal itself anyway.

Have you realized how the high quality setting affects exposure with MXE-60 flash? I operated first with 92%, but then only short distance subjects got the flash to fire. Please do some experments you too to notice this liimiting issue.

The limited dynamic range of the tiny CMOS sensor and the optical performance of the less than superious camera lens (as the careness of the photographer in terms of settings = exposure compensation etc) are the more dominating limitations ...



HI Mark,
try with this. v7.8 use 46 try with higher or less, i don't have flash MXE-60.

SET_JPEG_QUALITY= $p1 0e // Check if accessory flash is connected
$c1 01 // If accessory flash is connected...
$s2 50 // ...then use a hardcoded compression value-THis line sets the compression for MXE-60 do not cross 50 or else your flash will stop working
#SET_JPEG_MIN(00,01) // ...and change the min size limit to 1KB
$cx // End if
07 02 00 13 $w2 $w2 $w2 #CMD_END; // INIT, AVE, LAST
imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 12:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
RENOSJ wrote


Hi,

I changed this: from30.1 I gave to 7.8

30.1
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0a 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 1e $s0 01;

7.8
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 07 $s0 07;

[/quote]

Thanks,

We are not so far away from original camdriver according to my test above.
what you think?


@Mark_q
What we need? Natural color as we see or how Auto Color Correction Tool see?

As I can see, 30.1 is closer to Auto Color Correction Tool and 7.8 is closer to what we see. It is same with my test at home.





[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-05 14:24 ]
heins
C901 Black
Joined: Sep 05, 2006
Posts: 152
From: Norway
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 12:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxx @ToryXX i have sendt you a PM, please check it. xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
C901.
tranced
LG Nexus 4
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 14:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 08:50:02, ToryXX wrote:
tranced witch cam driver you used for your cat?:)



im using the 7.7 final modded from. im impressed. i dont know what to say about it. it is simple great. the sharpness is good. but there are vertical stripes.
I jay0726 | (+3, 0) | Clara, Evita, Mimmi & Victoria | My Pics | Do your job!
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-05 17:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i want to know if somebody can tell me where is the macro part in a cam driver????...please!!!!...
e_erzan
K850 Green
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore,Tanglin
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 17:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-04 19:46:32, imsje wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-04 19:11:39, diego23 wrote:




7.8 is little bit sharper.

I think color is diff. because of this.

30.1
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0a 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 1e $s0 01;

7.8
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 07 $s0 07;


which one is more natural. which light you used?



The one in bold is the software number that will be reflected only on your exif readings....no effect what so ever on the colors....

My 2cents!
e_erzan
K850 Green
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore,Tanglin
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 18:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-04 23:57:58, ToryXX wrote:
i don t know why the macro on the 30.1 ,7.7 edited or 7.7final...7.30....is not so good like in the old cam drivers....for example 3.1 by erzan and so on...why is like this???....i must make a shot in macro so many times untill i take a good one....before didn't was this problem!


@tory
The macro from 30.1 is based on 5.6c too,same goes to my 3.1....
All my camdriver series have same settings...nvr touch not even a bit....so it is the mentality and the needed skill to take nice macro pictures,not the driver....By the way...if you want great macro pics,use a real dedicated digi camera....please...this is just a phone i remind you guys again....dont expect too much from a point and shoot camera...a.k.a. fun camera...
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-05 18:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
imsje 7.8 is different ....look also this is changed ,,

7.7 moded

NOM_FPS = 05 02 00 08 3c #CMD_END //2e to 3c
06 02 00 01 3c 03 #CMD_END
06 02 00 01 81 34 #CMD_END
#WAIT_FOR_MODE;

NIM_FPS = 05 02 00 08 1F #CMD_END
06 02 00 01 1F 03 #CMD_END
06 02 00 01 81 34 #CMD_END
#WAIT_FOR_MODE;

7.8 cam driver

NOM_FPS = 05 02 00 08 #VR_NORMAL_MODE_FR #CMD_END //2e to 3c
06 02 00 01 3c 03 #CMD_END
06 02 00 01 81 34 #CMD_END
#WAIT_FOR_MODE;

NIM_FPS = 05 02 00 08 VR_NIGHT_MODE_FR #CMD_END
06 02 00 01 1F 03 #CMD_END
06 02 00 01 81 34 #CMD_END
#WAIT_FOR_MODE;

e_erzan
K850 Green
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore,Tanglin
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 18:15
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:46:21, aabg wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:05:44, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:03:09, aabg wrote:
best macros until now 7.12




you have a best picture with macro to show me? with 7.12?


actually i do not, i saw pictures with macro 7.12, in other forum, and seems to be better.
there was a driver with good macros, it could be 2.441, 5.6c, 5.4 we have too much drivers (in a good way )

[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2006-11-04 23:48 ]



Each of my realeased camdrivers are of an enhanced better version from the previous one...my ver30.1 is derived from 5.6c....fyi...
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-05 18:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
ok erzan thank you,i see that nobody know where is the setting for macro in a cam driver......
then please tell me what is making this things?

seq_ping=;

seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 07 $s0 07;
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 276277278 ... 307308309  Next
Goto page:
Unlock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic