Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750

Previous  123 ... 274275276 ... 307308309  Next
Author Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-04 21:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Mark_Q can you explain what is with this 2 pictures?...because i don't understand witch one is 7.8 and witch one is 30.1
Mark_Q
K750
Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 138
From: Helsinki, Finland
PM
Posted: 2006-11-04 22:07
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-04 22:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
thank you,

somebody can give me the exactly values of macro in a cam driver???.....where i find the macro values in a driver cam?...if somebody can help me pls


Quote:

On 2006-11-04 22:07:22, Mark_Q wrote:
ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]

imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-04 22:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post


[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 23:05 ]
imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-04 22:07:22, Mark_Q wrote:
ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]




Mark_q
What we need? Natural color as we see or how Auto Color Correction Tool see?

As I can see, 30.1 is closer to Auto Color Correction Tool and 7.8 is closer to what we see. It is same with my test at home.

Torry_xx , what you think?

[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 22:07 ]
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
to think what? just i want to know and to see witch values make macro on cam driver...can you help me please?:) imsje

Quote:

On 2006-11-04 23:02:04, imsje wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-04 22:07:22, Mark_Q wrote:
ToryXX,

I opened both samples in PhotoShop Elements and used as experiment (nothing I usually do otherwise) Auto Color Correction Tool, then saved the corrected version as copy and overlaid it with the original after I moved the copy to right and down for comparison.

Version 7.8 above, version 30.1 below. Just an effort to easier detect the overall color cast on both. Did I succeed?

EDIT:

These pairs are hardly the final absolute truth, but done by same software detecting color cast, so...

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-04 21:10 ]




Mark_q
What we need? Natural color as we see or how Auto Color Correction Tool see?

As I can see, 30.1 is closer to Auto Color Correction Tool and 7.8 is closer to what we see. It is same with my test at home.

Torry_xx , what you think?

[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 22:07 ]



[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-11-04 22:33 ]
aabg
K750
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
more 30.1
http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/9875/dsc00984nc4.jpg

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/2381/dsc00990ma8.jpg

Macro

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8335/dsc00991wf1.jpg

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4271/dsc00992zm4.jpg
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-04 23:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i don t know why the macro on the 30.1 ,7.7 edited or 7.7final...7.30....is not so good like in the old cam drivers....for example 3.1 by erzan and so on...why is like this???....i must make a shot in macro so many times untill i take a good one....before didn't was this problem!
RENOSJ
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 14
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Hallo,

Iam using 7.7 final + edited. A focused on true colors 30.1 versus this 7.7.
I changed in 7.7 final + edited from from 30.1 as written below. And result?
With that modification you can achieve more true colors. First picture is original, second is edited by me. The wall is white, no yeallowisch






Quote:

On 2006-11-04 19:46:32, imsje wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-04 19:11:39, diego23 wrote:




7.8 is little bit sharper.

I think color is diff. because of this.

30.1
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0a 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 1e $s0 01;

7.8
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;

seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 07 $s0 07;


which one is more natural. which light you used?




[ This Message was edited by: RENOSJ on 2006-11-04 23:05 ]
aabg
K750
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
best macros until now 7.12
ToryXX
W960
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:03:09, aabg wrote:
best macros until now 7.12




you have a best picture with macro to show me? with 7.12?
imsje
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:13
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
[quote]
On 2006-11-04 23:32:24, ToryXX wrote:
to think what? just i want to know and to see witch values make macro on cam driver...can you help me please?:) imsje

ToryXX

I really dont know for now, sorry.
Mark_Q
K750
Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 138
From: Helsinki, Finland
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
RENOSJ

Please give us full size originals. Thanks. What was your light source? Incandescent household lightbulb? Halogen? Fluorescent? Normal or night mode? The noise og resised samples point to normal mode, if so then the noise... and color fine tuning = mission impossible...
aabg
K750
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 00:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:05:44, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-11-05 00:03:09, aabg wrote:
best macros until now 7.12




you have a best picture with macro to show me? with 7.12?


actually i do not, i saw pictures with macro 7.12, in other forum, and seems to be better.
there was a driver with good macros, it could be 2.441, 5.6c, 5.4 we have too much drivers (in a good way )

[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2006-11-04 23:48 ]
Jemp
W580 Black
Joined: Jul 09, 2005
Posts: 39
From:
PM
Posted: 2006-11-05 02:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I can see in 30.1 camdriver, that when you are in a very bright sunight, the photos taken are very blurry. Other thing is that photos are a bit darker.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 274275276 ... 307308309  Next
Goto page:
Unlock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic