| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
HI ALL,
I found one macro missing in the drv 7.7 so it will be good to take new version 7.8. you never know when it will be important.
missing macro was WAIT_FOR_MODE_TRANSITION bcz Andeo used short version WAIT_FOR_MODE and forgot to change on the one place.
@plamen20
v7.8 has 15fps
@mark_q
I heard that is software for the MXE hardcoded so cannot be changed here?
Is it important for flash to be fluorescent by default?
You can change WB as you wish.
v7.8
everything same as v7.7final edited , only fixed macro.
http://rapidshare.com/files/1917705/camdriver0.dat.html
http://www.filefactory.com/file/e84777/
p.s.
v 30.1 is almost same with 7.8. based on the same 5.3 camdriver.
so everyone can decide which is better for him/her. we are not competition here, we try to find best drv which is possible for most of us.
cheers
v7.8 raw data last night through the glass
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6824/dsc05877pn0.jpg
[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 17:31 ] |
|
|
TheNerd
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 157
PM |
thanks.
but I cant figure our what "WAIT_MODE_TRANSITION bcz " is doing?
|
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 12:02:08, TheNerd wrote:
thanks.
but I cant figure our what "WAIT_MODE_TRANSITION bcz " is doing?
|
|
bcz is because.
here was missing macro WAIT_FOR_MODE
you can write what you want but it must be defined up as macro
//************************************************
// Power save mode, property 15 ***
//************************************************
//
// 0 => Leave power save mode
// 1 => Enter power save mode
//
//---------------------------------------------------
seq_set_prop_f_1=06 02 00 01 81 34 #CMD_END
#WAIT_FOR_MODE_TRANSITION
06 02 00 01 00 53 #CMD_END
06 02 00 01 01 5C #CMD_END #WAIT_FOR_POWER_SAVE_ENTER;
|
jiji
Joined: Nov 04, 2006
Posts: 30
PM |
i took the liberty to edit a little bit the 7.8 version.
You all do tremendous job.
http://rapidshare.com/files/1930026/camdriver0.dat (7.129 - no particular name)
-in initialization was a little mistake
- and was too bright.
one sample attached
7.8
7.129
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://rapidshare.com/files/1930026/camdriver0.dat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ This Message was edited by: jiji on 2006-11-04 11:34 ] |
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 12:33:13, jiji wrote:
i took the liberty to edit a little bit the 7.8 version.
You all do tremendous job.
http://rapidshare.com/files/1930026/camdriver0.dat (7.129 - no particular name)
-in initialization was a little mistake
- and was too bright.
[ This Message was edited by: jiji on 2006-11-04 11:34 ]
|
|
@jiji
You blocked EV . you cannot change from -2.0 to +2.0
one cannot expect to has best picture with default settings.
so we have EV bias to change from -2 to 2 and is often need
to put EV -0.3 or -0.7 to get same result as you.
and you changed FPS to 17 it is more than hardware support.
cheers
[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 12:31 ]
[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 17:34 ] |
wiser
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 26
PM |
hi guys.....
just a question.....7.7 is better than 30.1 ????
just asking cuz u guys should mood same drv.....and get just one to perfect shape.....
i saw u allready improoved 7.7 into 7.8 ....and i ask....what about 30.1 ??
what do u say e man ??....7.7 is better than 30.1 ???
if it is so....e man...u should leave 30.1 and take a look on 7.7(7. ....my personal preferences r for 30.1 ....instead of 7.7 ....7.8 not tested yet ...but u said only macro is changed....
and one question to u insje...why u say 17 fps in video --->not suported by phone ??...few drivers have 17 fps and worked just fine in video.....and gxg said its all about a balance in fps and quality....and 17 its ok 4 the quality.....i mean...i like its recording on 17fps.....anyway.....dont get me wrong....just a question.....why 15 fps its max in your opinion ??? |
wiser
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 26
PM |
sry IMSJE....i typed ur name wrong....sry again..
and about that angry face....i mean 7 . 8 ----- i guess 8 + ) =
[ This Message was edited by: wiser on 2006-11-04 13:52 ] |
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 14:51:09, wiser wrote:
sry IMSJE....i typed ur name wrong....sry again..
and about that angry face....i mean 7 . 8 ----- i guess 8 + ) =
[ This Message was edited by: wiser on 2006-11-04 13:52 ]
|
|
7.8 is not 7.7. it is 7.7final by Andeo and edited by me and then fixed for macro by me. to not make confusion i call them 7.8
Aksd said long time ago that is 15FPS normal for ours phone. OK it works with 17FPS but on the mine phone is jerky. it is not problem to change.
30.1 is also good driver . little bit blury on the mine phone.
each one has to decide which camdriver to use. we can make more version with 15fps with 17fps with fast focus or with changed exposure etc.
from the aksd to me every one tried to change some bits to get better driver and now we have more possibilities. choose one !
jiji want to change to 17FPS end exposure , every one want to change something. where is the end?
cheers
[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 16:50 ]
[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 17:52 ] |
wiser
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 26
PM |
i know its 7.7 final.....by andeo.....fixed by u ....sry...probably i wasnt clear enough.....
and .....7.7 final edited by imsje + macro fixed = 7.8 ....u said so....sry again...must have been in hury and didnt posted all ok
btw...wats andeo doin ??.... |
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 18:08:46, wiser wrote:
i know its 7.7 final.....by andeo.....fixed by u ....sry...probably i wasnt clear enough.....
and .....7.7 final edited by imsje + macro fixed = 7.8 ....u said so....sry again...must have been in hury and didnt posted all ok
btw...wats andeo doin ??....
|
|
Who knows ?
everyone moders leave us except e_erzan until now. we are alone .
[ This Message was edited by: imsje on 2006-11-04 17:23 ] |
diego23
Joined: Aug 27, 2006
Posts: 32
PM |
v30.1 by e_erzan  v7.8 by imsje  v30.1 by e_erzan  v7.8 by imsje  |
biasiman
Joined: Mar 27, 2006
Posts: 80
PM |
from the above comparison I see 7.8 definitely more yellowish and 30.1 more blueish. It is up to whoever took the pic to say which one is closer to the tue colors...
[ This Message was edited by: biasiman on 2006-11-04 18:46 ] |
imsje
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 76
From: Croatia, Dalmatia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 19:11:39, diego23 wrote:
|
|
7.8 is little bit sharper.
I think color is diff. because of this.
30.1
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0a 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;
seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 1e $s0 01;
7.8
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;
seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 07 $s0 07;
which one is more natural. which light you used?
|
biasiman
Joined: Mar 27, 2006
Posts: 80
PM |
Ya a bit sharper on the second... a little hand-shacking? |
Mark_Q
Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 138
From: Helsinki, Finland
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-04 19:42:53, biasiman wrote:
from the above comparison I see 7.8 definitely more yellowish and 30.1 more blueish. It is up to whoever took the pic to say which one is closer to the tue colors...
|
|
biasiman,
It's quite easy to put the original agains color corrected copy to see the color cast:
v7.8:
v30.1:
 |
|
|
Posted: 2006-11-04 10:50
