| Author |
Raider camera driver for C901 [current is v6.3.2] |
TTT
Joined: Feb 23, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Thanks Raider, works like a charm.
1st layer:
-1.0 manual focus
-0.7 Saturation
-0.3 Aino saturation
0.0 Contrast
+ 0.3 EV
+0.7 SS
+1.0 Gain
+2.0 Zoom
What "functions" are in 3rd layer? $s0 70-74
I  taking pictures |
|
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
Good  3rd layer is for me for research & development.
BTW. I see that contrast is pain in the ass for some of us Well, it is for me too, that's why default contrast value will change in v6.3
|
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
I wonder if we can have AEB assistant like on the K800i driver 
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!  ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
TTT
Joined: Feb 23, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Just had find out what that is and yea, that would be great to have something that takes different EV for same picture.
I taking pictures |
arcmhyke
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Posts: 334
From: Philippines
PM |
How's Raider v6.3 version doing?
Phone: Sony Xperia TX LT29i
Camera: Cyber-shot DSC QX10
Speaker: SRS BTV5 Wireless Speaker
Headset: MW1 Smart Wireless Headset pro | MH EX300AP |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
I wonder if we can have AEB assistant like on the K800i driver
On paper (in theory) C901 can do this without any tricks, with one click only. In practice I don't know yet
How's Raider v6.3 version doing?
Slow but not bad.
|
TTT
Joined: Feb 23, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
I saw that Anouk's driver for c902 can produce file size up to 7mb, isn't it possible for c901 to reach something like that?
I taking pictures |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Why would you want that? The quality wont get any better, it will just take up more room meaning you can take less photos
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010! ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
TTT
Joined: Feb 23, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
I know it makes no sense at all but i like it. Something around 5mb per pic would be fine. Then I'd have space for around 1000 more pics and 400 on my spare card. 
I taking pictures |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
I dont understand EV (exposure compensation) how does this make the picture brighter? its not ISO (sensitivity of sensor to light) and its not shutter speed (length of time sensor exposed to light)
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010! ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
Wikipedia will tell you about Exposure value
|
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Thanks
"increase exposure, by using either a longer exposure time or a smaller f-number." the f-number cannot be changed on camera-phones so I guess changing the EV value either changed the shutter speed or ISO
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010! ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
I saw that Anouk's driver for c902 can produce file size up to 7mb, isn't it possible for c901 to reach something like that?
Try to find differences between 2MB and 4MB pics We don't need superfine compression because we are not in the same league of quality as digital cameras. If quality is degraded by compression then compression must be low, very low or superfine with 0% data loss. We don't have enough quality from sensor to use ~0% data loss during compression. It will eat your memcard without any benefits. It's not my priority to implement superfine compression, maybe someday.
|
TTT
Joined: Feb 23, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
I know it's completly useless but I like it.
I taking pictures |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
We don't have autofocus in video mode, right?
|
|
|
Posted: 2010-04-08 12:05
taking pictures
