| Author |
Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 |
ziupo
Joined: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 74
PM |
hm i compare last 4 camdrvs and i think: sarmad 5.7 is very fast and 'give' natural colours, but I think about special version 5.7 witch VIVID and sharpness set to 4 in default 
So, Sarmadgiliani can you modify your driver to my proposition?
---------------
+/- 80km/h :
|
|
|
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
Important!
There was a bug in color correction code (i think it was in all 1.3 betas). Big thanks to Raiderski for finding this bug. Now it's fixed.
Do not use old drivers! Fixed version of 1.3 beta 4 is here:
plain: http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver0.dat
rar: http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver_spu_1_3_b4.rar
zip: http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver_spu_1_3_b4.zip
W800i CID36 R1BD001 |
679
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Posts: 174
PM |
@SPU&Raiderski
On 2007-06-16 16:16:35, SPU wrote:
Important!
There was a bug in color correction code (i think it was in all 1.3 betas). Big thanks to Raiderski for finding this bug. Now it's fixed.
Men, i see you can cooperate! I'm waiting if some new amaizing features will appear in both of your driver. Very hope...
Raiderski, is it possible include last SPU adaptive JPG compression in your driver? Thx. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
Men, i see you can cooperate! I'm waiting if some new amaizing features will appear in both of your driver. Very hope...
Raiderski, is it possible include last SPU adaptive JPG compression in your driver? Thx.
hehe, not exactly i still work under something called "my variation about supermode driver" and i like to look in the code of various drivers to search inspiration. i don't use old driver but ofcourse i can add SPU's compression if you wish. personaly i'm not a fan of compression up to 95% because of file size.
|
pakraider
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 313
PM |
I honestly can't understand why anyone would want compression settings higher than 89%... I doubt anyone can see any differences, and the file size becomes huuuuge...
moved on to the Nexus One..  needs a better Android  |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
sarmadgilani
Why don't have higher quality if we can? File size remains about 500-600 KB in any case, because now the quality is dynamical thing.
You want small files? Turn off Fine mode and you'll get files about 200-300 KB, but the quality is still dynamical and still can be very high on simple scenes.
W800i CID36 R1BD001 |
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
@spu
i can't use supermode in 1.3b4, all ev ranks don't do anything, just change autofocus  |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
aabg
First of all you need to turn it on. Use <<**>> combination.
W800i CID36 R1BD001 |
F-Lexx
Joined: May 09, 2007
Posts: 163
From: Romania
PM |
What does 89% JPEG compression mean? That the file size would be reduced from 100% (uncompressed) to 89%? If that were the case, there shouldn't be too much of a difference in file size, but as SPU said, why not get the best quality possible? |
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
@spu
ok thanks, unfortunately mi joystick doesnt work too good  |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
F-Lexx
No. Not the size. This is a value of estimation of visual difference between the original and compressed image.
There is hyperbolic like dependence of size on quality. For example, 96% image is about twice size of 95% image, but 10% and 11% will have very close sizes. But the real size depends on complication of picture, so you can get in 550 KB a simple picture with 95% quality or a very complicated picture with for example 70% quality.
My driver always sets highest possible visual quality fitting the resulting picture in given memory limit.
W800i CID36 R1BD001 |
pakraider
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 313
PM |
On 2007-06-16 19:04:35, SPU wrote:
sarmadgilani
Why don't have higher quality if we can? File size remains about 500-600 KB in any case, because now the quality is dynamical thing.
You want small files? Turn off Fine mode and you'll get files about 200-300 KB, but the quality is still dynamical and still can be very high on simple scenes.
Outrageously large file sizes do not necessarily correlate to higher quality.. I honestly can't tell the difference between a shot at 89 compression versus 92, for instance. The file size goes up very much, but I don't think it's worth it.. just wasting space. I have a 4 GB stick so file size doesn't matter to me, that's why in my drivers I've set it to 89 compression.. beyond that, I don't see much benefit.
moved on to the Nexus One.. needs a better Android |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
sarmadgilani
Take this utility
http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/jpeg-snoop.html
and inspect your photos. I think you'll be surprised 
[ This Message was edited by: SPU on 2007-06-16 22:21 ] |
strong
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Greece
PM |
This pics I took after flashing my k750 to w800 with sarmads 5.7 sharpness from 5 to 4
your opinion please
 |
pakraider
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 313
PM |
Yeah, I've seen jpeg snoop before, thanks for the link. I understand your point, but I'm talking about the picture itself, and how it looks on the screen. I don't see much difference in how the pictures look, and in the end that's what really matters.
moved on to the Nexus One.. needs a better Android |
|
|
Posted: 2007-06-16 16:10
needs a better Android 
