| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
white balance:automatic
5.3 original
7.12
7.30
[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2006-11-01 21:01 ] |
|
|
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
thank you aabg for comparation ...i see that 7.30 is very good one  |
Mark_Q
Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 138
From: Helsinki, Finland
PM |
Yesterday I decided to make my definitive comparison between three camdrivers;
- the original SE version 5.3, only the JPEG quality values maximized (Fine 85% -> 95%, Normal 75% > 93%, Flash 50% -> 85%)
- ver30.1 with edited bits, posted by e_erzan (page 261)
- v7.30 fixed by gxg, posted by smuko (page 265)
Because I'm the only tester who can re-do the comparison with the very exact same conditions, concerning camera-to-test subject position, light enviroment, I have to process systematically - the only way.
Three exposures using the same settings to see focusing failures etc. Night mode "ON" on all because the environment, a room lit by single 60W lightbulb.
- Picture quality on "Fine"
- Picture quality on "Normal" (to see difference in visual quality and file size)
Personally I would never use the "Normal" quality.
- White balance on "Auto" (because this would be default choice)
- White balance on "Incandescent" (because this would be the natural choice, household lightbulb = ~incandescent)
- White balance on "Fluorescent" (because some modders have opted for it)
My testing take place on light level high enough for proper exposure without additional light, but also so dark that the MXE-60 will fire.
- No additional light
- LED light "ON"
- MXE-60 connected, on "Auto"
If needed I would use compensation in order to be able to define the differencies between samples taken with different camdriver versions.
- Exposure compensation (brightness adjustment) -0.3
- Exposure compensation (brightness adjustment) -0.7 (or even less)
- Exposure compensation (brightness adjustment) +0.3
- Exposure compensation (brightness adjustment) +0.7 (or even more)
As I started yesterday with 7.30fixed I faced so many failures I had to make notes on paper. I re-started with the original and went on with ver30.1. I also created another still life looking like this:
 http://www.ImageShack.us" />
Today I tested v7.30fixed again only to experience several failures: of the 21 photos taken only 12 got captured because the camera view went suddenly back to Main menu! My notes can tell this happened when I selected Exposure compensation -/+0.7 and when I had MXE-60 connected.
How many of you satisfied with v7.30 have used exposure compensation? Please try out and experience, would your camera fail too?
So I will skip v7.30fixed I leave it out as long there are other versions. My K750 fell yesterday twice on the floor, 125cm, as my tripod claw slipped it (=my fault). Twice I heard strange "BIZZZ" sound during the photo taking, something alike the lightbulb sounds just before it breaks down and goes black. I was really scared; am I about to destroy my K750 because of this testing? Is this worth it??
EDIT:
Unfortunately I don't have time right now to upload the succesfull samples. Sorry!
[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-11-01 22:19 ] |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
Mark_Q so with witch cam driver you will be in your mobile finally? and this picture http://img162.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00060jt8.jpg it was made it with what?...5.3 ? or 30.1?
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-11-01 22:27 ] |
Mark_Q
Joined: May 01, 2005
Posts: 138
From: Helsinki, Finland
PM |
@ToryXX, The new still life sample was taken with "maximized" SE original 5.3, the changes vs original being told in my text.
More about all this later... Sorry! |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
ohhh i think i'm tired can you give me a simple answer the picture from up is taken with 5.3 original yes?....and 5.3 have more stability yes? |
n0brega
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
Posts: 48
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-29 23:10:21, aabg wrote:
Mark could you upload k750 r1bd001 5.3original?
i know what you mean with 30.1edited but it can be fixed just turning on in white balance fluorescent mode
macro on
nightmode on
led on
white balance: auto
macro on
nightmode on
led on
white balance: fluorescent
[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2006-10-29 22:16 ]
|
|
@ aabg those pictures were realy good! could u plz describe what phone you have (k750 or w800) and what firmware r u using (describe if its k750 with w800 firmware or so..)
tks in advance
Regards |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
5.3 original witch ISO Speed have? |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
look here a super clear picture take it with k750i without modifications
http://flickr.com/photo_exif.gne?id=45595522&context=set-996681 |
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
@n0brega
k750 fw R1BD |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-11-02 00:23:22, aabg wrote:
@n0brega
k750 fw R1BD
|
|
witch driver?...is the driver original from
k750 fw R1BD....5.3 original? |
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
no, 30.1edited |
n0brega
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
Posts: 48
PM |
its camdriver 30.1 edited bits by e_man |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
please can you give me here the 30.1 edited by erzan  |
n0brega
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
Posts: 48
PM |
There you go!
@ abbg tkz for the quick answer |
|
|
Posted: 2006-11-01 21:48
http://www.ImageShack.us"
