| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
the point is not making superb low light pics with a mobile phone cam. but to prove whether there are other SE phones takes better low light pics than k850. -> pls keep it in mind.
i posted some pics here.
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=171812
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-06-25 06:13 ] | |
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
hhhmmm, Perfect, WHY CANT YOU(someone) SHOW ME A INDOOR PICTURE TAKEN IN REAL LOW LIGHTNESS IN FULL SIZE BY k750, w810, N82, etc , etc with good quality,..........im waiting !
i didnt think so, (only cell phone ( precisely like i said) who manage good, sharp REAL low light pictures is i-mobile 902.
Amras. ????? this is no damn low light pictures, (they are all shoot against some strong light-source),.DONT YOU UNDERSTAND, THERE IS NO CELL PHONE WITH IS TINY SENSOR WHO MANAGE SHARP REAL LOW LIGHT PICTURES.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 09:07 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 09:12 ] |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-06-25 09:46:12, plankgatan wrote:
hhhmmm, Perfect, WHY CANT YOU(someone) SHOW ME A INDOOR PICTURE TAKEN IN REAL LOW LIGHTNESS IN FULL SIZE BY k750, w810, N82, etc , etc with good quality,..........
i didnt think so, (only cell phone ( precisely like i said) who manage good, sharp REAL low light pictures is i-mobile 902.
Amras. ????? this is no damn low light pictures, (they are all shoot against some strong light-source), ha ha ha, this is just what Perfect talked about....DONT YOU UNDERSTAND, THERE IS NO CELL PHONE WITH IS TINY SENSOR WHO MANAGE SHARP REAL LOW LIGHT PICTURES.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 08:58 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 08:58 ]
still the big question is, can your k850 manage to take better pics and details than what i posted in such conditions? if can, then prove it. coz you haven't proved it yet, plank.
you always talk about k850's details, so then let's prove it. i'm sure it's not that hard for you who brags about k850's details all the time.
and what you just said, k850 can win easily in such conditions that i used, and then you just posted "like this one" -> some bright outdoor pic, it's really not relevant at all. and it's shrinked (again!). see, that is the reason people don't believe you and keep asking.
are you that afraid of posting the full-sized low light pics??
so all i can say is.. that k770 can beat easily k850 pics detail in low lights. like this one:
irrelevant? yes.. that's what you did actually.
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-06-25 09:07 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-06-25 09:14 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
and STOP write rubbish in this thread, this thread is for k850-PICTURES, how hard can it be ???
if you want to play it that way (with pics shoot against strong light sources), k850 will win easily, like this ones
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 09:16 ] |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-06-25 10:10:33, plankgatan wrote:
and STOP write rubbish in this thread, this thread is for k850-PICTURES,
and if you want to play it that way (with pics shoot against strong light sources), k850 will win easily, like this one
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 09:13 ]
you can do better than that. it's not even half sized.
http://www.esato.com/board/img.php?id=84579 -> where's the original? i wanna see if the writings on the ads can be read.
_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...
feel free to visit my art gallery. 
Macheli @DeviantArt
Trivia: Did you know, that the beauti
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-06-25 09:18 ] |
Duran
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands
PM |
Also, those were the 1st pictures revealed before k850 was released.
Plank didn't make them, and i still wonder whether those were even made by a k850
[ This Message was edited by: Duran on 2008-06-25 10:37 ] |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
On 2008-06-21 01:48:17, puestadelsol wrote:
K750 vs. k850
Here are the pictures, and some 100% crops too. NO xenon, no leds, the same conditions, the same place, all the pictures are shot with timer.
With the K750 honestly is the first picture shot in these conditions, with the K850 is about after 10 shots in these conditions, and I think these are the very best results, and I couldn't make better even I would shot untill the morning. And, the pictures from K850 are shot just at 3mp, and the 100% crops are looking crappy, at 5 mp I don't know what kind of details would I get, but surely it would be worse.
And sadly I think there is no way to get in these conditions in this place better results, details, textures or sharpness from the K850. However i would be glad if K850 would produce better pics, which would be better just than a 2mp picture shot by a K750.
Here are the pictures.
K750
100% crops
K850 auto mode
100% crops
K850 document mode
100% crops
And... the focusing is good.
[ This Message was edited by: puestadelsol on 2008-06-21 01:02 ]
You can see, the only light source is the standing lamp, which reflects in the tv, and is set about 75% by the switch. And k850 can't cope with the K750 2mp details, so the k850's 3mp offers less details, and inforamation then k750's 2 mp. With 5 mp, the details would be more washed out, with more explosion/oil paint effect.
I haven't too many freetime, but I'll make another comparisons.
And please keep in mind that K750 was released 3 years ago, and K850 about 8-9 months ago so I think this comparison is more than fair. I think, or at least I hope that in the end of this year the C905 will win the battle against the K750. , only the weight of K750 would be winner.
[ This Message was edited by: puestadelsol on 2008-06-25 12:21 ] |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
Plank, you have taken over 7000 (or 8000/9000/10000?...) pics with your K850, an average of 30 pics/day everyday, and you show these shots not taken by you??? (and like said by Duran they probably don’t come from a K850)
The examples posted by puestadelsol and Amras clearly show the ability of K850 in low (even not very low) light conditions in comparison to other phones.
We all wait YOUR REAL SIZE pic in low light conditions...and wait...and wait...
|
tai020381
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
Guys, THIS IS A POST FOR PHOTOS TAKEN BY K850, NOT FOR YOU GUYS TO SQUABBLE!!~~~ AND IF YOU GUYS WANT TO SQUABBLE PLEASE CREATE A NEW TOPIC AND GO ALL AT IT (that is, if moderator approves it.) |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
stop this off topic-crap now.(we just destroy the thread even more)
some nice rose pic, no edit
i remember when i tried to get this portrait quality with my k750, it never become like example this cat-picture. the sharpness is way better on k850....
no edit...
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 16:40 ] |
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
@plank: If you are happy with your k850, keep it, you dont have to prove to anyone how wonderful it is.
In my opinion, K850 takes decent low ligh pictures, the flash is there for that purpose, isnt it?
Heres some pictures I took using flash:
at the final of the party k850 was really wet 
_________________
Don't You Wish Life Had Background Music To Go With ?
G900 Coming Soon 
[ This Message was edited by: Coquito on 2008-06-25 16:21 ] |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
I don't really understand, why some uf you are complaining when somebody posts comparison pics about K850. This thread isn't just to deify the K850 camera, which performs below expectations in term of details or low light, sometimes in sharpness.
When somebody want to buy a K850 for it camera, and is an esato member, but didn't tried the k850's camera, what does he/she do? Visits the post pictures taken with your k850 thread, and watchs the pictures. But if we post just perfect pictures, without comparisons, without 100% crops, which demonstrates the crapy details produced by the k850's camera, then somebody interested in k850 camera can't create an owerall image about the K850 camera. Then some of us says that it's just a phone, how can we expect more from it? Just because there are phones which can outperform the K850.
[ This Message was edited by: puestadelsol on 2008-06-25 18:16 ] |
Guto_ViP
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: |Brazil|
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-06-25 19:14:31, puestadelsol wrote:
I don't really understand, why some uf you are complaining when somebody posts comparison pics about K850. This thread isn't just to deify the K850 camera, which performs below expectations in term of details or low light, sometimes in sharpness.
When somebody want to buy a K850 for it camera, and is an esato member, but didn't tried the k850's camera, what does he/she do? Visits the post pictures taken with your k850 thread, and watchs the pictures. But if we post just perfect pictures, without comparisons, without 100% crops, which demonstrates the crapy details produced by the k850's camera, then somebody interested in k850 camera can't create an owerall image about the K850 camera. Then some of us says that it's just a phone, how can we expect more from it? Just because there are phones which can outperform the K850.
[ This Message was edited by: puestadelsol on 2008-06-25 18:16 ]
Man... Perfect!
Last day i saw one K850 Silver/Black... Is beautiful... but only this for me, because i dont think the K850 give always good pictures, of course on daylight all camphone can take a good picture, but about night, K850 isnt work fine... 
K850 Silver:
_________________
Oh Yes! Now with a N82 Black Edition - firmware v20.0.062 (My birthday gift), but K800 stay with my mom.
[ This Message was edited by: Guto_ViP on 2008-06-25 20:08 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Guto_ViP on 2008-06-25 20:17 ] |
jippi
Joined: Oct 25, 2007
Posts: 13
From: Bergen, Norway
PM |
Some images straight from the camera - nice Norwegian scenery. 
Waiting for the ferry...
On the way up.
Nice fjords
The goal: Prekestolen
Crazy people - it is 604 metres down to the sea!
_________________
norwegian dating site
[ This Message was edited by: jippi on 2008-06-25 21:45 ]
[ This Message was edited by: jippi on 2008-06-25 21:47 ]
[ This Message was edited by: jippi on 2008-06-25 21:49 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
@Jippi, i been on that cliff. its just awesome up there
if you had taken this pics with cloudy profile, wooaah man, you would got some stunnig pictures with very good colors. (just a little tip for next time
| |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-06-25 05:15
