| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
he he he. offers some real pics ??? @Amras, are you for real man, he have NEVER post a picture (what i seen) from his own  phone. he just link to other people picture all time and say, "look here, here is the proof. K850 is bla bla bla"
ok....tomorow (like Vipera just said) we will see some nice compare indoor-pics between w810 and K850.....do you really believe that yourself. (maybe you his friend or something)
here is some w810 indoor pics i found in my usb-memory....(im not using w810 right now because it have a crappy camera, just kept it because its a nice phone overall)
wooaaahhh, what a quality...it blow everything away bigtime...yeh sure.
here is more shrinked (so it should look better)...... w810 SUCKS in low light/indoor,
more w810 indoor...woooaahh, this quality blow me away.. MUCH MUCH BETTER THEN K850...yeh sure
more stunning indoor w810
_________________
I K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 22:47 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 22:53 ] | |
|
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
amras i already shown you a couple months back how k850 managed low light pics without a flash.....so what's the reason?
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice |
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
On 2008-06-24 23:29:33, plankgatan wrote:
he he he. offers some real pics ??? @Amras, are you for real man, he have NEVER post a picture (what i seen) from his own phone. he just link to other people picture all time and say, "look here, here is the proof. K850 is bla bla bla"
ok....tomorow (like Vipera just said) we will see some nice compare indoor-pics between w810 and K850.....do you really believe that yourself. (maybe you his friend or something.....he he)
more w810 indoor...woooaahh, this quality blow me away.. MUCH MUCH BETTER THEN K850...yeh sure
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 22:37 ]
well at least the red IS RED! 
dude you are such a joke. you keep saying there's no way the w810 is better than the k850 in indoor lowlight, but yet you YOURSELF refuse to post low light pics to prove otherwise. we have, many times over shown you low light pics, that are far better than k850, but you won't show any that you have taken?
as for the w810 shots you've posted, they are not optimal. in your own words "you need to spend the time to learn the camera" which obviously you didn't.
W810 CID49 R4EA031 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i dont bother longer. let us stay on topic now...or ???
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 23:06 ] |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
many times over shown you low light pics, that are far better than k850, but you won't show any that you have taken?
he just post resized low light photos, i think he is afraid of oil paint effect in full size images...
somethin like this:
OnePlus 8 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
vipera dont forgett about tomorow....(it will be very interesting, becuase it seems that you have no clue what photographing really is)
on topic now, (I(we) have allready talk to much off topic-crap, think most people start to hate our guts)
some more nice macro pics by k850. no edit
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 23:18 ] |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
Guys, don’t say lies...ALL k850 users (that try it...) know that this phone CANT take acceptable pics with low indoor light like ONE neon (even looking a resized 1024x768 pic), and don’t show pics where there is more amount of light like a supermarket...with LOW light K850 look very ill.
Vipera want to show this, and even though he hasn’t one’s K850, it’s however a REAL comparison in REAL SIZE with the same light conditions...right?
Ah...Plank...I have the copyright for blablabla...
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
of course you right, K850 take unbelievable bad indoor/low light pictures and like some other says, (like we see above) w810 take stunning indoor/low light pictures.
ps. (about low light pics)... there is NO cell phone who manage REALLY low light pics with decent quality, (no i mean really low light pics, example a room with one lamp on, etc). if a k750, w810, N82, K850, etc, etc even will have ok quality it needs more lightness that many thinks. (just so you know)
--------------------------------------------------
found some nice compare pics between k810 and K850 (by Pitzon). this is good low light-condition i think, (some winter-evening-garage):
K810i
K850i
Perfect (with your permission and knowledge about indoor pics) is this indoor pics ok to post, do they qualifield ???? (i dont want to make o fool of myself )..sadly, i have not this in full size.
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 00:46 ] |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
Plank, can you read what i have written???
I have sad not like a “supermarket” and you post this...
Those are not with LOW light, the N82 can manage low light with decent quality, not like K850.
Someone have already ask it, can you post your BEST real size with LOW light?
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
sorry, i have no super-low light picture who looks ok, (not even of my old pics from k750, w810, k800, k810). i have take many low light pics with this 4 phones, but i have never manage to get one really sharp low light picture.
so maybe you can you show us a k750, w810, k800, etc (or a N82 if you want) who is taken in REAL low lightness ???
(i have not seen that kind of picture yet). of course in full size like you said
thanks.
ps.
what about this low light pics. (full size or not)...do they qualifield, can we say something about the quality (even they are posted in shrinked size)
K810i
K850i
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 01:05 ] |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
On 2008-06-25 01:30:08, plankgatan wrote:
found some nice compare pics between k810 and K850 (by Pitzon). this is good low light-condition i think, (some winter-evening-garage):
K810i
K850i
This is stupid...
How to compare this two phone with these pics...First pics are not same...
|
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
YOU say: “sorry, i have no super-low light picture who looks ok”...I know the reason...
And you know that i don’t have Nokia N82, so don’t ask me to show you a REAL pic of this phone.
Everyone can see the BIG difference between K850 and N82 with low light in other forum, but maybe not you...
And in this last pic, how can we know that it’s from K850? And how can we see the real quality with a shrinked size?
That’s why people always ask you the real size...but you don't give us it...
So...where is your "proof"???
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
edit. we posted same time.
"know the reason" ??? I TOLD YOU THE REASON, so please, dont act like you know something like we other dont.
let us see some really low light pics now with good quality, you have been saying quite some time now about other cell phone quality, it cant be that hard to find ONE good picture ??? or ??
he he he. you know as well as me, that their is NO cell phone, (except i-mobile 902) who manage good sharpness in really low light condition. so stop this crap...............
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-25 01:15 ] |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
On 2008-06-25 01:30:08, plankgatan wrote:
found some nice compare pics between k810 and K850 (by Pitzon). this is good low light-condition i think, (some winter-evening-garage):
K810i
K850i
Here is two pics, like pics k810 vs k850
Is this same?!?
|
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
Plank, are you serious when you say that K850 is at the same level of N82 in low light pics?
You continusly surprise me...You don’t need a N82 pic with low light to see a better pic (better of K850 of course), you can wait Vipera tomorrow...or see the comparison above with T650...
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: -PERFECT- on 2008-06-25 01:26 ] | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-06-24 23:29
