| Author |
post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850 |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Well this is Just a BIG CRAP!And it really makes me mad ,i don't see whats such a big deal that plank is using photo dj in some of his pics.SE made this special future for the k850 because they knew that k850 haves some saturation problems......photodj is there to use it.And if he says that the pic is original it's original i've been on this forum for almost 2 years and i never saw him tell a lie about one of his pics.I can get exactlly the same color results as he does so i don't see what's such a big deal.
And PLANK READ MY SIGNATURE and you will understand why is no reason to prove them nothing ,is important that you are happy with the phone and that's the only thing that matters
_________________
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice
[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2008-06-23 21:52 ] |
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
a funny thing is when people say...whaaat, how can you(we) get this sharpness, you muuust been using photo dj... (sharpness cant been improved by any photo dj. the sharpness is still 100% original how much photo dj you even use)
and like you say Luci, how hard is it to get good colors ??? just use right settings with (more important) right lightness......then you get original saturation like example this pic
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-23 22:47 ] |
darknoob
Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
 |
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
@plank
why don't you post up pics so everybody can see them full size. you must be man enough to do that. here are some samples. unmolested and unedited in any way. surely if the lowly w810 can take these kinds of pics, then the king k850 can do it.
http://picasaweb.google.com/c[....]6/LowLight?authkey=SimcoITEWjU
@luci
i have no issues with ppl editing pics and posting them up so long as they say so. but when plank is posting pics and parading his k850 as being the best thing in the world and he's posting edited pics and not admitting to it, then that is just wrong. there are tons of ppl reading these forums and getting wrong impressions.
W810 CID49 R4EA031 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
are you for real. i have post many full size pics. LOOK IN THE THREAD next time...ok
but sure, here you go, try to do this with your stunning w810:
all pics is 100% original...(no photo dj, nothing)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 09:23 ] |
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
dude you obviously have problems reading ... post LOW LIGHT pics, 1/15s shutter speed or lower. see the samples i posted.
EDIT:
and yes I AM FOR REAL ... see i posted samples. now you follow suite and show everybody that you and YOUR k850 are for real and post some full size low light shots.
[ This Message was edited by: cronos555 on 2008-06-23 23:13 ] |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
On 2008-06-23 13:25:32, plankgatan wrote:
@vipera. stop comment my quotes & pictures. you have nothing good to say anyway. (second, i post 99% of my pics in 1024 x 768, which means shrinked (approximately) ONE time)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-23 12:40 ]
hahahaha  ) =))
approximatelly ONE time.... 1024x768=786432=0.76megapixels
original size: 2592x1944=5038848=5.03megapixels
so the shrinked size is (0.76/5.03=15%) 15% of the original, less than 1 megapixels... so NO OFFEND, but almost every second phone with autofocus... even with 1 megapixel camera can produce this quality at this size and with a xenon flash even in low lighting conditions would produce decent quality.
Sadly in the case of k850 the noise and the dots, pixels caused by it are visible at this size too. Could be the negative effects of tiny senzor and 5mp resolution? Then how produces the C905 with 8mp resolution better pictures then K850?
I don't know, but the K850's camera is still qiute crappy. I don't know if it is due the firmware, hardware or both, but it still can't satisfy my expectations. I hope a new, better firmware with better camdrive, but I think the real solution will be a next phone. Sadly the one fault of C905 will be it's weight. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
(j##la bonnläpp)..... have you guys nothing more then just complaining ???
why dont you post some of your own perfect pics in full size instead. (i didnt think so).
im satisfield with this pictures, think they looks good for a cell phone camera.
K850, best phone I ever use.... (no edit)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 10:06 ] |
DAS85PUG
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: 12
PM |
@plank
If you're happy with them then that's all the counts
I think your photos are excellent! Keep up the good work dude 
Dave |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
some pics. no edit
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-06-24 13:36 ] |
tai020381
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
R1FA035. Auto macro, EV-1.3
http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/4499/dsc02553ov7.jpg
[ This Message was edited by: tai020381 on 2008-06-24 14:28 ] |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-06-23 23:45:58, cronos555 wrote:
@plank
why don't you post up pics so everybody can see them full size. you must be man enough to do that. here are some samples. unmolested and unedited in any way. surely if the lowly w810 can take these kinds of pics, then the king k850 can do it.
http://picasaweb.google.com/c[....]6/LowLight?authkey=SimcoITEWjU
that's what i called low light. coz it's really lowlight. of course its meaning is different to "indoor with bright lighting". |
Zuko
Joined: Dec 25, 2007
Posts: 68
PM |
@all k850 users:
Do you clean the glass that protect the lens cover on k850 before taking a picture?
I noticed sometimes it improves the quality, try yourself
@Plank:
Excellent pictures!!
Ps: If you are not happy with your k850 jus SELL IT!! and buy another phone that make you happy and stop complaining.
@Cronoss: Your w810 pictures are great, do you use a modded camdriver?
Ps2: If anyone is going to sell his/her k850 cheap, pm me 
[ This Message was edited by: Zuko on 2008-06-24 15:38 ] |
Duran
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands
PM |
 |
strizlow800
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM |
Nice pictures here. Anyway K850 will be one of the best camera phones imo when the A200 FS access will be enabled, then it's camera driver would be changed with much better modded one.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-06-23 22:49
Sony Ericsson software/hardware support! 
