| Author |
Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 |
lengstreet
Joined: Apr 18, 2007
Posts: 92
From: Thailand
PM |
@all
photos taken by k750i cid49 camdriver sarmad 5.7 (sharpness5)
|
|
|
pakraider
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 313
PM |
Ok, some updated links for everyone to use..
For W810 users:
Sarmad 5.7 driver: http://www.mediafire.com/?6njgyymqtlx
Sarmad 5.7 w/ Spot Photometry: http://www.mediafire.com/?3wntxdhyeqz
For K750/W800 users:
Sarmad 5.7 for K750/W800: http://www.mediafire.com/?e6nbhywy2nd
Sarmad 5.7 w/ Spot Photometry for K750/W800: http://www.mediafire.com/?bzzxt3dudze
_________________
W810 R4EA031 with Sarmad camdriver 
[ This Message was edited by: sarmadgilani on 2007-06-03 05:21 ]
[ This Message was edited by: sarmadgilani on 2007-06-03 05:21 ] |
lengstreet
Joined: Apr 18, 2007
Posts: 92
From: Thailand
PM |
@Sarmad
some update for K750/W800 ur modded 05 56 right? |
pakraider
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 313
PM |
@lengstreet :
Yes, the K750 version sets the sharpness to 5, and your shots show that it works quite well. It also has a fix for some phones that would crash, hopefully it will work ok now.
Of course, if you have a W810, USE THE regular version..
On 2007-06-02 10:51:14, ljcii wrote:
however is it possible to make video frames taken per second more? like 30 frames per second
No, the phones have hardware limitations that won't let you get 30 fps.. I believe the W900 is the only phone that lets you do that.. K750, W800, and W810 can't go much above 15fps, which is pretty good considering its just a 176x144 resolution. still makes for decently fluid video..
and remember everyone, this IS a phone primarily... right...? 
[ This Message was edited by: sarmadgilani on 2007-06-03 06:03 ] |
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
below are a couple of comparison shots. SPU 1.3beta3 vs Sarmad 5.7
NOTE: the first two shots ended up having the exact same shutter and iso results, so comparison is really valid.
spu 1.3beta3, night mode, focus infinity, incandescent wb, manual shutter 1.0s, iso ended up being 100
sarmad 5.7, night mode, focus infinity, incandescent wb, macro ON, picture quality = normal (fine was making everything too bright), iso ended up being 100, shutter ended up being 1.0s
spu 1.3beta3, night mode, auto focus, incandescent wb, manual shutter 1/3s, manual iso 200
sarmad 5.7, night mode, auto focus, incandescent wb, macro ON, picture quality = fine, iso ended up being 80, shutter ended up being 1.0s
 |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
small underexposure (-0.3eV) in SPU improves general quality effect. black is more black and not dark gray. this is only scaled photo so we cant say nothing more but in my opinion quality is on equal level. remember that SPU driver is "super-mode" and offer much more if you need much more
BTW. can you please compare my mod of 21.91 also? i am curious...
this was my first and last modification of standard driver. i changed conception of development into "mini-super-mode" and in new driver not much stayed from original 21.91 driver
_________________
www.flickr.com/photos/8469432@N06/
W800 CID36 R1BD001
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-06-03 09:23 ] |
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
@Raiderski
i usually find that sarmad's driver is too overexposed and -0.3 to -0.7 EV correction is required in all shots, day or night. but in these, i left EV at default 0.0.
i will try to get a comparison shot with your modded driver tomorrow. |
cronos555
Joined: May 01, 2007
Posts: 110
PM |
below shots sarmad 5.7. focus infinity. macro ON. picture quality = normal.
that cat was moving when i snapped the pic
W810 CID49 R4EA031 |
ljcii
Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 82
PM |
No, the phones have hardware limitations that won't let you get 30 fps.. I believe the W900 is the only phone that lets you do that.. K750, W800, and W810 can't go much above 15fps, which is pretty good considering its just a 176x144 resolution. still makes for decently fluid video..
and remember everyone, this IS a phone primarily... right...?
wads the default video taking?
w900's camera capabilities are much better than w810i? |
Anaghdesai
Joined: Jun 03, 2007
Posts: 1
PM |
I have a w810i FirmwareR4DB005 CID49
I installed the 8.54 camdriver ..
The driver works fine... But I cannot access the SuperMode function..
Which camdriver should my model have??
Can someone please paste me a link to it....
Thanks!! |
strong
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Greece
PM |
Some pics with k750 R1DB001 CID 36 Sarmad's 5.7 last , maybe the best for now drivers
[ This Message was edited by: strong on 2007-06-03 13:31 ] |
ljcii
Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 82
PM |
i dont kno if this affects the picture quality however
i realise dat at the screen b4 u take photo(camera screen) kriomag and chengrong's driver hav bright and no lag screens however the sarmad's drivers look very dull does it matter? |
amorphis
Joined: May 24, 2007
Posts: 13
PM |
Sarmad 5.7 (sharpness 05 56)
Kiromag 21.91 modded
|
radicalgel
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 98
PM, WWW
|
In my opinion krio's 21.91 modded by raiderski is the best driver for the w810 as of now.
Big thanks to krio for the incredible driver and raiderski for fixing the bugs and making this driver just right!!!
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/radicalgel/ |
ljcii
Joined: May 25, 2007
Posts: 82
PM |
any of u tried it under low light conditions? the picture are sort of weird but i dunno if its myself anyone can prove me wrong? |
|
|
Posted: 2007-06-03 04:26
