Author |
Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 |
gubrin Joined: Sep 09, 2006 Posts: 19 PM |
You can`t say that from pictures in comparison. Just look at bricks below that glass surface or on bells. Nokia shots looks more realistic for me too and yes there`s a lot less noise on nokia pictures. I hate noise lines on my k750i shots :/
Only macro shots are better on k750i.
Gubrin |
|
norbi_nw Joined: Nov 27, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Romania, Timisoara PM |
Nokia does not equal with quality in any way (picture/mp3 - only video)
Nokia phones are sharp, thanks to the Carl Zeiss lens, and have UNNATURAL COLORS!! - just look at the sky and any other object - too purlpe/bluish. It uses alot of software sharpening (sometimes OVERSHARPENED). Even n95 is buggy, and dethroned by the mighty k810i, the new photo king from SE. Also the nokias dont use pixels in pictures... they make pictures like... paintings/sketch - if you try to snaphot some leafs, you'll get a big green mass, with NO details. Unfortunately k810i has left the pixel photography, and uses some kinda mask (in k750i a pixel was a pixel, but in k800/810 it aint)
Sad, but true (look at nokia always comparing 5MP to 3.2MP LOOOOL - and still looses )
[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2007-06-01 23:22 ] |
amorphis Joined: May 24, 2007 Posts: 13 PM |
On 2007-06-02 00:21:00, norbi_nw wrote:
Nokia does not equal with quality in any way (picture/mp3 - only video)
Nokia phones are sharp, thanks to the Carl Zeiss lens, and have UNNATURAL COLORS!! - just look at the sky and any other object - too purlpe/bluish. It uses alot of software sharpening (sometimes OVERSHARPENED).
like when you try to use some noise remover algorithm in ACDSee photo edit (despeckle for example), it tries to remove noisy pixels for smoother image, but it will be a mass.. |
lukkkas Joined: Mar 03, 2007 Posts: 13 PM |
On 2007-04-24 19:49:20, sarmadgilani wrote:
On 2007-04-24 19:25:02, cosminfs wrote:
Hey guys. I tried out 4.81 on my CID49 W810 and it's great, focus works excellent and there isn't too much noise, but i noticed that maybe....i don't know.... maybe the jpeg compression is too big because the files size is small like ~350kb, because when i take a picture of for example a printed text document, when i zoom on the text on the computer I can read the text but very hardly, but with the old driver 8.54 i could see the text excellent even in poor light and the file size was 500kb. Perhaps someone can make a version of 4.81 with a bigger file size ? Maybe when you activate macro the filesize would be bigger to allow greater detail. It would be excellent ! And also thank you Sarmad for this driver.
ok, please try this version of 4.81 and tell me how it is now.. im very interested in how this works out for you, so please report back.
http://www.mediafire.com/?1ydwzinzuq1
@Sarmad
Hey pal..i don't Know Why, but THIS version of 4.8 not posted officialy by you..it's still the best for me without a doubt ....excelent ENM( a little noisy, but excepcionally sharp and fast) cool colors...well balanced
Can u correct on this one the "WB options when LED is on" bug that u applied on later version??
And can u apply on this on the MXE-60 support?
If u Can i will thank u forever and ever
@ Raiderski
Your mod on 21.91 is really good to (works better than krios ones)..can u apply the compression from this 4.8 version for me?
i want to make a comparission on my k750@w800 CID36
THANK YOU GUYS!! |
pakraider Joined: Jul 25, 2003 Posts: 313 PM |
@lukkkas
the 5.7 driver has the bugfix for WB profiles as well as MXE-60 support. It also has the same compression settings as the link you posted.. so dont worry, 5.7 has the features and fixes that you are looking for.
moved on to the Nexus One..  needs a better Android  |
lengstreet Joined: Apr 18, 2007 Posts: 92 From: Thailand PM |
@Coo|io
Sarmad 5.7 Sharpness5 (05 56) work on k750i cid49 : http://www.mediafire.com/?5xjuttky03p
Thx Sarmad for suggest me. |
radicalgel Joined: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: 98 PM, WWW
|
He he. Ya it seems I missed that page. Thanks!!
----------------------------------------------- http://www.flickr.com/photos/radicalgel/ |
salambaba Joined: Feb 21, 2007 Posts: 119 PM |
W810 with 5.7 Sarmad :
All K550i MODDS : http://amirfarzam.4shared.com |
Power_VANO Joined: Jun 02, 2007 Posts: 144 From: Georgia PM, WWW
|
hi guys!
I have SE K750i and I want to know which is the best camdriver for it? I wont my phone to take the best pictures which it can take. |
ljcii Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 82 PM |
i would like to use 5.7 without cc is it available?
o its great changed my mind
but i realized that the nightmode doesnt have mch difference?
i cant take gd night pictures
[ This Message was edited by: ljcii on 2007-06-02 10:02 ] |
navy614 Joined: Mar 08, 2007 Posts: 38 From: China PM |
@sarmadgilani
I love your driver!Right now i am using your 5.6!When i try to download your new 5.7,i found this link didn't work on my computer!
Could you pls give me another links or send to my email.
my email:navy614@163.com
Any helps thanks a lot |
ljcii Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 82 PM |
however is it possible to make video frames taken per second more? like 30 frames per second |
kutlas Joined: Apr 15, 2007 Posts: 30 PM |
On 2007-06-02 10:50:12, navy614 wrote:
@sarmadgilani
I love your driver!Right now i am using your 5.6!When i try to download your new 5.7,i found this link didn't work on my computer!
Could you pls give me another links or send to my email.
my email:navy614@163.com
Any helps thanks a lot
sarmad 5.7 driver:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/ql55k7 |
ljcii Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 82 PM |
any reviews on sarmad 5.7 vsother drivers? |
aabg Joined: Sep 23, 2006 Posts: 206 PM |
someone would put sarmad's 5.7 manual focus into chengrong's 8.53? and maybe also replace the manual focus of chengrong's 5.4 for sarmad's 5.7?
here the link 8.53-----> http://s4.quicksharing.com/v/[....]er_camera_driver_8.53.rar.html
and 8.54 (this is only the camdriver for cid36)------->http://www.mediafire.com/?6wktjgdjmyx
i tried to do it myself but i can't do it.
thanks!
[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2007-06-02 16:29 ] |
|