| Author |
Post comments and pictures about/from C702 here |
rukna
Joined: Nov 12, 2007
Posts: 36
PM |
Macro + spot on
 |
|
|
rukna
Joined: Nov 12, 2007
Posts: 36
PM |
Macro
 |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
@rukna: Very nicely done! Tolerable noise still there, but mine also produces similar or worse results.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
rukna
Joined: Nov 12, 2007
Posts: 36
PM |
thx mate  if use spot + macro, will get back screen pic in black so it less noise as usual, I think |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
I think that's because using spot + macro makes the camera focus even more on the center - making the background darker. But I experimented with it and have to agree with you
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
TeknoBoi90
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: 164
From: Piemonte, Italy
PM |
Here are some pics which I took last week during my holidays with the even Snow-Resistant C702.... They're a bit white xD
First one...
This is with worse light conditions....
Basically the same scene with different weather and light....
|
TeknoBoi90
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: 164
From: Piemonte, Italy
PM |
I forgot to say that drivers are the standard ones...
|
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
3rd picture from top looks like a scene from Lord of the Rings, cool.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
djfoo000
Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 3
From: Malaysia
PM |
I dunno if it's me but doesn't most (if not all) of the pics taken here have a glare to it when taken under the sunlight? It's hard not to notice it. Is it due to the EV value or the cam? Coz if it's the EV then it can be corrected.
I am seriously interested in the C702 so please clear my doubts about this phone, camera-wise.
|
ardzuna
Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 467
PM |
Maybe it's the Esato watermark you are seeing. Images uploaded on Esato server have this watermark.
|
djfoo000
Joined: Oct 06, 2008
Posts: 3
From: Malaysia
PM |
No no. It's not watermarks. I mean almost all of the pictures taken under sunlight give the impression that it's taken under a sunny day and the color of those pics look a little faded.
From what I see, no matter how clear the object in the picture is, if it's taken under the sun the whole picture looks a bit faded, or like it's taken in a very sunny day.
Some also have like a blueish tint to it.
My current phone is a W810i so I'm unfamiliar with the post-processing a cybershot phone does compared to the non-cybershot phones. I was wondering if it over-processes a picture to a point that the edges of the object looks faded, or it's the EV.
I realise that cybershot phone photos have like an over-processed feel to the edges of objects and whites of the picture.
Do enlighten me.
[ This Message was edited by: djfoo000 on 2009-01-30 11:08 ] |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
well, as am a c702 owner, i will start posting some pics. and what a way of starting 
|
TeknoBoi90
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: 164
From: Piemonte, Italy
PM |
Bleah... xD
|
jay0726
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Posts: 75
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
that horror, that disgust..
[addsig] |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
But you know i enjoy it
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-12-14 04:26
jay0726 | 
