| Author |
Modded Camera Driver for k800i/k810i |
obentou
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 364
From: Toronto
PM |
Excellent work vudu, I am just doing a couple of shots with your camdriver... looks absolutely great! |
|
|
HaRRiKiRi
Joined: Jul 12, 2008
Posts: 3
PM |
Also, where exactly is the newest kopritis driver? The first post is empty and no link or change log. I have 2.7 version and I found were to download 2.71, but I would want to know whats the changlog for that. Also, some say something about 3.5 kopritis driver.. where tha hell can you find that? |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-07-13 23:34:34, HaRRiKiRi wrote:
Also, where exactly is the newest kopritis driver? The first post is empty and no link or change log. I have 2.7 version and I found were to download 2.71, but I would want to know whats the changlog for that. Also, some say something about 3.5 kopritis driver.. where tha hell can you find that?
|
vudu70
Joined: Apr 15, 2008
Posts: 383
From: Hungary
PM, WWW
|
Thanks Goldmen! 
_________________
K810i Golden Ivory R8BA024+vudu v4.14C camdriver+eXtreme Audio III & K750i+Ultra Superdriver v6.7+TVH v7/vudu acoustic
[ This Message was edited by: vudu70 on 2008-07-15 08:28 ] |
HaRRiKiRi
Joined: Jul 12, 2008
Posts: 3
PM |
Ou sorry, I had something mixed up. I have 3.7 and I download 3.71. Not 2.7 and 2.71. Thou I would like to know the changes in 3.71 so I know if I need to update the 3.7 driver. I don't want to do it because its kind of slow for me, so if there is something good in it then I will probably do it.
Again, about the software thing. If phone can't compress 320x240 then maybe software can? Just make it capture pics at VGA quality and codec it separately in software. It should be possible. And thus, even 2mp and 3mp quality should be possible (thou it would be an overkill because phones cpu isn't that fast), but VGA could be possible. Can somebody confirm that this is possible? |
dngeorgiev
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Posts: 71
From: Bulgaria
PM |
Please provide me with the latest version of the Original K800i Cam Driver, I think I am done with the moded ones, I just need the latest original.
Thank you! |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
dngeorgiev
Latest original versions for K790/K800/K810 are Evita 2.5 or Wilma 2.5
They are identical,the title is only difference.
You can find `em here:
http://www.4shared.com/dir/8231422/46177328/Original.html
[ This Message was edited by: Goldmen on 2008-08-05 14:05 ] |
dngeorgiev
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Posts: 71
From: Bulgaria
PM |
Is there a Cam driver, which has got no 'super mode', I just need finer point and shoot settings, I would like to use all of the shoot and scenes modes as I do on the original one, I do not need more functionality, just some fine settings of the standard modes. |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-07 12:39:57, dngeorgiev wrote:
Is there a Cam driver, which has got no 'super mode', I just need finer point and shoot settings, I would like to use all of the shoot and scenes modes as I do on the original one, I do not need more functionality, just some fine settings of the standard modes.
May be this one:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=165805&start=0
 |
czaki91
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Posts: 8
PM |
I tested 5 camdriver: ALL auto mode
Raiderski 6.3.3
N1 3.05 SM
Goldmix 2.51
Withan V3 Rev1
Vudu 4.41
Wow Vudu70 your driver is awesome Simple but powerful. For me THE BEST in indoor and low light conditions scenes !! THX for your work and i waiting for new ver.
[ This Message was edited by: czaki91 on 2008-08-13 11:02 ]
[ This Message was edited by: czaki91 on 2008-08-13 11:06 ]
[ This Message was edited by: czaki91 on 2008-08-13 11:10 ]
[ This Message was edited by: czaki91 on 2008-08-13 11:26 ] |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-13 12:01:42, czaki91 wrote:
It's funny:
Raiderski and Withan have ~70kb
Goldmix and N1 have ~260kb
It`s most likely because of the difference in JPEG compression settings... |
czaki91
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Posts: 8
PM |
yes but biggest size=more quality ?? |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-13 12:28:05, czaki91 wrote:
yes but biggest size=more quality ??
It`s not necessary...
But in most cases could be cause for bigger noise or camera crashes...
Raiderski`s explanation of JPEG compression:
On 2008-07-30 23:56:05, Raiderski wrote:
SE phones are equipped in very nice algorithm and great feature - variable compression. it is seeking the best quality % level. question: seeking? yes, this means that quality of all your pictures can be different (therefore name is variable compression). question: so, what for is 91% quality defined in driver? well, this is nothing more than simple tip for the algorithm, in this way it knows where to start process of seeking. question: ok, it knows where to start but where it ends? it's trying to predict jpeg file size with various combinations of quality % levels. predicted file size is then compared to jpeg file size rules (defined by modders in driver). if comparision will be positive then jpeg can be created, otherwise quality % level is increased (if predicted result is below defined file size rules) or decreased (if predicted result is above defined file size rules) for next file size prediction. question: does this means that defined file size rules in driver are major parameters? yes, they are, quality % level will be adequate to max file size we want to have. you can set in driver quality 100% but in fact this level of quality is unreachable in 900kb file (you can check this with EXIF readers). question: no matter of what can I set quality 100%? yes you can but for what? this is only initial stress for compression algorithm and it will blow out into dust your dreams about 100% quality
my observations:
- average file size is ~820kb (many folders, more than 100 files in each folder)
- average file size of shots with flash or low detailed scenery is ~680kb
so, I can push the rules a bit higher in next version. top quality range 90 - 95% in cameraphone? madness! with SE you guys are really in jpeg's compression heaven even if you don't believe 
[ This Message was edited by: Goldmen on 2008-08-13 11:42 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
well, if you want to compare you must assure very similar conditions especially when your scene have wide range of luminosity (very bright window and dark room in your case). look at photos - the are taken from different positions and angles. why is this so much important? because this kind of divergences have major influence on autofocus and on autoexposure when luminosity range is very wide (like on your scene). different autoexposure levels will give you different results. small example...
two pics merged, as you can see they are really different
sorry but your test isn't authoritative
EDIT: why picture from Vudu is the best? because very bright spot from window is smallest on this picture. less overexposure = more details in dark parts of the picture
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-13 12:12 ] |
czaki91
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Posts: 8
PM |
Raiderski please talk to me Polish my English is bad ;/
Mniejsze "przepalenie" zdjecia tak tylko ja nie wiem jak w twoim sterowniku ustawic zeby nie bylo tego przepalenia. Które parametry jak ustawić ??
Vudu dla mnie wygrał ponieważ na auto mode dobiera najlepiej parametry (tak mi się wydaje)
[ This Message was edited by: czaki91 on 2008-08-13 12:56 ]
[ This Message was edited by: czaki91 on 2008-08-13 12:58 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-13 21:59
