| Author |
Official SE C901 Cybershot discussion |
SaLiH
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
|
Guys, just wait until plank buys C901, and changes his opinion again, again, and again... first it was K750i, then K810i, then K850i, now it`s C902, all of these phones were the best camera phones ever made (bla bla bla), while he owned them, and the reality is totally different, only the legendary K750i justified the title...
Nokia 3310->Nokia 2100->Nokia 3100->Sony Ericsson K700i->Sony Ericsson K750i->i-mobile 902->Sony Ericsson K800i->Sony Ericsson T650i->Sony Ericsson C901->Sony Ericsson Elm->iPhone 3GS->iPhone 4s->iPhone 5->iPhone 5s->iPhone 6->iPhone 6s->iPhone 7 Plus |
|
|
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
The K810 was pretty good too.  |
SaLiH
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
|
I know, I had a K800i! K800/10i had one huge issue, and that was agressive noise reduction that produced water colors/oil paintings photos. It seems that all other SE CyberShot phones except for the K770i inherited the same issue...
C901i looks promising, I just hope it will be released in Bosnia, Croatia or Serbia, so I can get it... 
Nokia 3310->Nokia 2100->Nokia 3100->Sony Ericsson K700i->Sony Ericsson K750i->i-mobile 902->Sony Ericsson K800i->Sony Ericsson T650i->Sony Ericsson C901->Sony Ericsson Elm->iPhone 3GS->iPhone 4s->iPhone 5->iPhone 5s->iPhone 6->iPhone 6s->iPhone 7 Plus |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
it would be a pretty useless if you felt you upgrade to a worse camera when you bought a new phone, wouldn't it ? 
(i can agree that i was a bit disappointed with K850 in auto mode, otherwise it rock)
anyway. this C901 pictures here on Esato looks so different to this Japanese (or whatever they are shot)....think we can wait to give C901 the final verdict.
I just HOPE they turn out different then how they looks now, I bloody hate this smudge/washed-out-Nokia-quality this Japanese pictures have. 
edit...
ps. is it just me and Raederski who think outdoor pics looks way to yellow(warm) ??
edit again...
hhhmmm.... None of this C901 pictures here on Esato have this yellow nuance, they are the opposite (quite pale) ??? just wondering what type of C901 this Japanese guy had ??
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-24 21:27 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-05-24 21:42:48, plankgatan wrote:
ps. is it just me and Raederski who think outdoor pics looks way to yellow(warm) ??
edit again...
hhhmmm.... None of this C901 pictures here on Esato have this yellow nuance, they are the opposite (quite pale) ??? just wondering what type of C901 this Japanese guy had ??
I guess you missed CodeMonkey's explanation (on page 22 of this thread) on the daytime outdoor color temperature close to vs far away from the equator. Seems that your observation only confirms what he said: I assume that Mizzle's test shots were taken in Denmark while the "Japanese guy" probably shot his photos close to his home.
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
pictures from latest review (link by puestadelsol) clearly shows that there's no problem with white balance in C901. now I'm even more excited
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
yeh, this latest outdoor pics have no major yellow nuance, so thats good news . still, i think they looks quite Pale(milky).
(cant see them in bigger size....anyone ????)
the only thing i wishing is they get rid of this nasty smudge-N95-quality
Ps.............
what happened to Esato ???? (the graphic looks messed up ...anyone else with the same weird problem ???
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-05-25 11:29:35, plankgatan wrote:
the only thing i wishing is they get rid of this nasty smudge-N95-quality
Yeah. It looks so fake when they haven't NR'd and oversharpened the sh*t out of all fine details, doesn't it? Better stick with your beloved C902. They may never produce another camera phone like it again.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-05-25 11:11 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
of course they will. SE have several phones with same (similar) excellent processing and Sony hardware. (k800/k810, w902, C905 + some more) so im pretty convinced they keep on using same great method 
(as long they dont use Samsungs-ultra-mediocre-Mid-End-cameras in the future....im pleased )
|
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
When is the c901 out in UK?
Phone?? What phone?? |
10123
Joined: May 29, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-05-25 16:07:00, Bonovox wrote:
When is the c901 out in UK?
Wont be released in the UK, which seems strange as it was announced in the UK, but its because operators are not intrested so it will be released in selected countrys only. |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
On 2009-05-25 16:44:16, 10123 wrote:
On 2009-05-25 16:07:00, Bonovox wrote:
When is the c901 out in UK?
Wont be released in the UK, which seems strange as it was announced in the UK, but its because operators are not intrested so it will be released in selected countrys only.
In spite of these two more countries has appeared on the following link -Thailand and Finnland- so one more European country on the site at last. I hope C901 will be available in more countries...
http://www.sonyericsson.com/c[....]pgid=key.MobilePhoneGroup.C901 |
mrscarrface
Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Posts: 64
PM |
its so strange that Sony Ericsson wont release C901 in the Middle East!.. hopefully this changes in the future cause i really want that phone :/ |
amorphus
Joined: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 41
From: Bulgaria
PM |
SAR - 1.57 W/kg (10g).  
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
have you guys seen this alarming result about Nickel value on cellphones. Samsung L-700 realise insane much Nickel. (they stopped L-700 directly). its the navy-wheel who is the problem. (Nickel allergy is a growing health issue world wide).
1.
L-700 = 20 mikrogram
2.
Viewty = 8 -||-
3.
Nokia 6300 = 4 -||-
4.
w890 = 0.9 -||-
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-05-28 10:29 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2009-05-24 18:27
