| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
Quote:
| It's the last version with corrected exposure settings. |
|
Andeo what you changed, i tested 5.0b and 5.5ub and color are more real in 5.5 version 5.0 seems to be more white |
|
|
masterv
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
Posts: 55
From: Germany
PM |
Same for me. The pics I have taken aren't as good as with the 5.5ua driver.
And with 5.0, the pics have only ~300kb. |
gxg
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: 270
From: Romania
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-04 20:27:19, smuko wrote:
What exactly is the difference between the cam drivers from the latest firmware for w800 and from k750? Some commands maybe?
I don't know why, but I have a feeling that I took much better pictures with k750 f/w than with w800. Anyone have an opinion?
|
|
W800 - have on the side "Walkman" brand
K750i - 2mpx phone
I presented you as they were relesed... by SE marketing Department.
Basicly they have the same platform but .they are for difrent things.. normaly by OS SE make the diffrence.
As is WV and Skoda. Skoda have the same chassy as WV... and the OWNER is the same... everything on skoda is WV brand... but the diffrence is obvious... do you get my point?
The same with SE phones. If SE wanted the same functions in K and W series... they could only release the gadgets and interchangeble facias... not TOTALY difrent brands. K and later W.
That's why... W is good in music... k750i in phone camera. Given fact that the hardware is the same except headset+memory stick .... the only diffrence is made by OS. i have K750i and i had both OS... nothing's worked as good as K software on K series. I had D750 before.. so i can tell that i notice this by observation in time (almost 2 years). |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
gxg witch driver you use now? |
gxg
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: 270
From: Romania
PM |
0.0 it's in testing.. not to post ..yet!
este in teste am facut cu pretenul indian un driver pornit de la cel dat de tine aseara... si am umblat putin la setari... e in teste.. maine pe zi o sa fac cateva poze si o sa trimit. daca vrei ..detalii.. da un buzz. pana pe la 0.00 nu dorm. |
dinho666
Joined: Jun 07, 2006
Posts: 103
From:
PM |
Hi there
Some pics using 5.5a driver!!!! VERY good driver... all pics i took inside the bus
5.5a - nightmode
and a LOT of thanks for answer my questions...
Who Wanna Live Forever???
*|No Hissing| 7.12(e_erzan edited) camdriver |menu icons edited |media player skin| Slim Fonts|W810 AcousticsR1BC002 AMERICA 2 |Unlimited SMS capacity |
-"W750" mooded, K850 full debranded |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-04 17:00:48, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-04 16:20:25, smuko wrote:
@gxg:
So, you are saying that some of the values from the cam driver are written in the memory at phone startup.
Then if we delete the driver and restart the phone, this routine will not work, because there will be no driver to take the values from, right?
But then if we put the driver back in the /other/drv folder, the camera works perfectly without restart. Why? I'm missing the point.
|
|
What for you asking so much questions?
What do you think about dispdriver0.dat?
Did the phone refresh dirty data in display driver without restart?
Not of couse!
And in camdriver0.dat, too. The end. 
At loading in the memory writing only basic parameters, such as driver version:
seq_get_prop_0 = $s1 05 $s0 03;
and some other.
The driver version couldn't be changed without restart. Check it now...
Sorry, I don't know all basic parameters, yet.
That's why camera working if you put driver after loading.
|
|
Andeo, I'm not meaning to be difficult, I just want to have a good understanding, but do you know of any basic variables that are loaded at startup that affect actual picture quality? See, I don't really care about the camera version updating.
And please don't get impatient with me, I'm a computer tech, I know all about drivers and hardware etc. I fully get the concept that SOME things need to be booted to properly initialise, but I also know most drivers on a windows pc can be installed without restart, that's why I'm asking are you just assuming that the camdriver needs a restart, or have you actually pinpointed driver variables that affect picture quality that need to be loaded at phone startup?
I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to verify exactly what you are saying.
|
2uk3y
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 214
From: Visit Malaysia 2007
PM |
all this pictures take by change the driver and restart the phone !!!!!
all in default setting, using FINE !!!!
Camdriver 3.1 - Original size 525kb
Camdriver 5.0a - Original size 489kb
Camdriver 5.5ua - Original size 471kb
what i can see is........
sharpness is almost the same, not much different.....
3.1 and 5.0a have same color tune.... 5.5ua maybe a little blue....
5.0a got same quality with 3.1 but with lower file size ......
so guys what do u think ???
  800i R1BC002 |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
I agree with your analysis.
|
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
i dont see diference, i only see in 5.0 a white stains between the trees
[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2006-10-05 04:53 ]
[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2006-10-05 04:55 ] |
g-roxx0304
Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 127
PM |
i kinda like the 5.0a one.
anyways,i tried searching for the 5.0a driver at http://se.dgd-bg.com/.
but can't seem to find it.
can you upload for me?
[ This Message was edited by: g-roxx0304 on 2006-10-05 04:55 ] |
2uk3y
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 214
From: Visit Malaysia 2007
PM |
all this pictures take by change the driver and restart the phone !!!!!
all in default setting, using FINE, MACRO ON, SELF-TIMER ON !!!!
Camdriver 5.5ua - Original size 504kb
Camdriver 5.0a - Original size 540kb
Camdriver 3.1 - Original size 535kb
what i can see that in Micro situation, 3.1 totally the winner......
also 3.1 got the same color with the real thing....!!!!
so guys what do u think ???
800i R1BC002 |
Andeo
Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Posts: 52
From: Russia, Ekaterinodar
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
i dont see diference, i only see in 5.0 a white stains between the trees
|
|
What about you say?
There are very big white stains to be distortion.
Maybe it's puff of smoke or something else...
Quote:
|
5.5ua maybe a little blue....
|
|
A agree with it, because v5.5U have some little errors in exposure settings.
I eliminate all these errors in v5.0
To max_wedge:
There are many difference between Windows and SEMC platforms.
I sayd only that I think right.
Sorry, if my words irritate you.
[addsig] |
Andeo
Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Posts: 52
From: Russia, Ekaterinodar
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
all this pictures take by change the driver and restart the phone !!!!!
all in default setting, using FINE, MACRO ON, SELF-TIMER ON !!!!
.....
what i can see that in Micro situation, 3.1 totally the winner......
also 3.1 got the same color with the real thing....!!!!
so guys what do u think ???
|
|
Look at third picture:
frame of clock have yellowish shade.
[addsig] |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
and andeo where is ver 5.0 without errors...because i have then the 5.ua with errors... |
|
|
Posted: 2006-10-04 20:46
800i R1BC002
