| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
numb
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
no, you cannot install in any other way.
|
|
|
ozzyboy
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 65
From: constanta, RO
PM |
k....and what i must do to get lost this CID49?
|
IRFCA_WDG-3A
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 359
From: Rajdhani Express!!
PM |
@ max,
do i look a fool? Why the hell wud i tell them that it's been meddled with. but somehow, they discovered the fact in their lab......they accepted the fone, went into the workshop, came out 10 mins later saying that it'll not be covered under warranty as it's been meddled with.
I tried to play innocent but of no use 
|
IRFCA_WDG-3A
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 359
From: Rajdhani Express!!
PM |
BTW, i also want now : a comparision between 2.1, (2.2 needn't be tested), 2.3 and 2.4 versions of the drivers.
Comeon, rockygali, max and others - we're waiting!
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-07-15 19:16:16, IRFCA_WDG-3A wrote:
@ max,
do i look a fool? Why the hell wud i tell them that it's been meddled with. but somehow, they discovered the fact in their lab......they accepted the fone, went into the workshop, came out 10 mins later saying that it'll not be covered under warranty as it's been meddled with.
I tried to play innocent but of no use
|
|
Sorry,my bad  Didn't mean to infer anything at all, it just occured to me that how would they know? I forgot that of course they would be able to look at the phone's insides - I was getting mixed up with thinking it was a completely dead motherboard, in which case they wouldn't have known.
The whole thing really sucks, because you could hardly say the actual hardware has been meddled with. The fault is an inherent hardware weakness, and nothing whatsoever to do with "meddling".
But they have you on a technicality.
|
jleosza
Joined: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 128
From: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
PM |
i already did a comparisson between version 2.1 and 2.2, and 2.2 sucks, the pics get blurred, the best driver of all is the 2.4, it has no noise at all
W800i RIBC002
-camdriver 2.71 -no hissing -modified menu and player |
marcpogs
Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 89
PM |
@jleosza
i agree with you... hybrid 2.4 is the best since it produces less noise than the others
try it peeps and see for yourself.
thanks! |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
Just installed 2.4 - did some preliminary tests - colour good, noise good, but it's nighttime now - will test again in the morning
|
IRFCA_WDG-3A
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 359
From: Rajdhani Express!!
PM |
@ Max,
Quote:
|
Sorry,my bad Didn't mean to infer anything at all, it just occured to me that how would they know? I forgot that of course they would be able to look at the phone's insides - I was getting mixed up with thinking it was a completely dead motherboard, in which case they wouldn't have known.
|
|
That's okay, no probs dude...........the only sorrow I'm feeling now is having to live without my most beloved possession. I got a Panasonic GD92 as a standby till the fone is back, time to browse to some panasonic forums now
Anyway, back to the topic, looking fwd to some tests from ur side. And also try to get some night time snaps in the following way:
1> Without nightmode, without flash
2> With nightmode, without flash,
3> With night mode, with flash.
so that we can compare the noise levels in darkness :cheers:
|
naveensiva
Joined: May 21, 2006
Posts: 441
From: (((INDIA)))
PM, WWW
|
where to put this driver file???? and can anyone suggest the best one so....i have downloadd the 2.5 versioon....can anyone say wht the hell this driver would do..
|
arnarn911
Joined: Oct 04, 2005
Posts: 141
From: Pilipinas
PM |
has anyone confimed that the white lines noise is hardware related? i hope somebody can upload some comparison pics.
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-07-15 21:26:32, naveensiva wrote:
where to put this driver file???? and can anyone suggest the best one so....i have downloadd the 2.5 versioon....can anyone say wht the hell this driver would do..
|
|
Please go back to the start of the thread and read, since all your questions are answered in previous posts.
I'm not meaning to be unhelpful, but if you read the thread like everyone else you would
1. become quite informed about this topic,
2. Have answers to all your questions above, all of which have been asked several time before.
3. Not be taking up people's time or forum space.
_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750 K750 Tricks
[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2006-07-16 02:17 ] |
brian2k1
Joined: Jul 06, 2006
Posts: 10
PM |
I tested the 2.4 vs the 4.5 R1BC modified and the conclusion I came to was that the 2.4 snap pictures faster, the result is better sharpness because it minimizes the chance of your hand / object moving causing blurryness. The 2.4 also does not suffer from the over-exposure of the 2.1 which caused the sky to wash out in out door photos. The 2.4 however generally produced a colder picture. The modified 4.5's had warmer colours that were generally more vibrant. This only downside to the 2.4 is nothing that some photoshop cannot fix and I'm only being pickey by pointing this out. I did not notice any decrease in overall noise like some people pointed, in fact I found that the modified 4.5 driver had a little bit less noise then the 2.4 but the result was to inconsistent to make a firm determination. It appeared that noise patterns in pictures changed from shot to shot even in the same position and lighting.
IMO, I think aksd has reached the limit with these 2.4 and appauld him on his efforts. This driver is as close to perfect as I believe we are going to get at this point I believe our hardware is the limiting factor. The 2.4 will stay in my camera for now. |
IRFCA_WDG-3A
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 359
From: Rajdhani Express!!
PM |
@Naveen,
WTF is version 2.5???????????? The latest is 2.4!
[ This Message was edited by: IRFCA_WDG-3A on 2006-07-16 05:29 ] |
2uk3y
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 214
From: Visit Malaysia 2007
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-07-16 04:37:37, brian2k1 wrote:
I tested the 2.4 vs the 4.5 R1BC modified and the conclusion I came to was that the 2.4 snap pictures faster, the result is better sharpness because it minimizes the chance of your hand / object moving causing blurryness. The 2.4 also does not suffer from the over-exposure of the 2.1 which caused the sky to wash out in out door photos. The 2.4 however generally produced a colder picture. The modified 4.5's had warmer colours that were generally more vibrant. This only downside to the 2.4 is nothing that some photoshop cannot fix and I'm only being pickey by pointing this out. I did not notice any decrease in overall noise like some people pointed, in fact I found that the modified 4.5 driver had a little bit less noise then the 2.4 but the result was to inconsistent to make a firm determination. It appeared that noise patterns in pictures changed from shot to shot even in the same position and lighting.
IMO, I think aksd has reached the limit with these 2.4 and appauld him on his efforts. This driver is as close to perfect as I believe we are going to get at this point I believe our hardware is the limiting factor. The 2.4 will stay in my camera for now.
|
|
yo bro brian2k1.....
can u translate ur description above with photo...... 
any picture ???? |
|
|
Posted: 2006-07-15 19:10
