| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
gxg
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: 270
From: Romania
PM |
Andeo.
Don't want to offend you.. but.. in last driver there is some choke... because of Iso.. most likely...
if you'll try 2.72 camdriver made by aksay, you'll notice that outside take an example: seaside or mountain landscape.. you don't need to use macro mode to take a good sharp, clear picture.
maybe TOGHETHER we can improve some things. For example night mode & macro - erezan, outside-day pictures - akshay and you for the colors and bugs in the programing language.
What do you say?
for begining i propose 2.72 without spot from akshay or 3.1 latest from erezan. |
|
|
Andeo
Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Posts: 52
From: Russia, Ekaterinodar
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 18:14:20, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 17:55:59, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 17:42:04, ToryXX wrote:
here is the comparation between 3.1 and 5.5a ! 
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-10-02 16:43 ]
|
|
Can you take more snapshots and place original files in arhives?
For me, please.
|
|
ok look here ! i make original how you whant  ...just i see that in e man driver is more more ....sharpeness softer pictures!
|
|
You used 5.5a.
I attached 5.5U versions with exposure corrections some posts ago.
Can you test last version, for example - 5.5UA |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 18:32:44, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 18:14:20, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 17:55:59, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 17:42:04, ToryXX wrote:
here is the comparation between 3.1 and 5.5a !
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-10-02 16:43 ]
|
|
Can you take more snapshots and place original files in arhives?
For me, please.
|
|
ok look here ! i make original how you whant ...just i see that in e man driver is more more ....sharpeness softer pictures!
|
|
You used 5.5a.
I attached 5.5U versions with exposure corrections some posts ago.
Can you test last version, for example - 5.5UA
|
|
well i used one with 5.5a and your last 5.5au or ua...and i used one 3.1 the first and 3.1 from today |
Recruit
Joined: Aug 10, 2006
Posts: 34
From: Hell
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 16:07:20, Andeo wrote:
Recruit, some information for you:
$c0 01 id number for size 100 x 60 -- don't used
$c0 02 id number for size 160 x 120 -- used
$c0 03 id number for size 320 x 240 -- don't used
$c0 04 id number for size 640 x 480 -- used
$c0 05 id number for size 1280x 960 -- don't used
$c0 06 id number for size 1600x1200 -- don't used
$c0 07 id number for size 1632x1088 -- don't used
$c0 08 id number for size 1632x1224 -- used
|
|
Thank you very much. I wanted to ask about this:-) Another question about camdriver: Is it possible to force MXE-60 to flash even in good light conditions? |
Andeo
Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Posts: 52
From: Russia, Ekaterinodar
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 20:00:05, Recruit wrote:
Thank you very much. I wanted to ask about this:-) Another question about camdriver: Is it possible to force MXE-60 to flash even in good light conditions?
|
|
I'll try to do something tomorrow |
Recruit
Joined: Aug 10, 2006
Posts: 34
From: Hell
PM |
Ok, thanks and wish you good luck. |
paternoster
Joined: Dec 03, 2005
Posts: 87
From: Belgium
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 20:00:05, Recruit wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 16:07:20, Andeo wrote:
Recruit, some information for you:
$c0 01 id number for size 100 x 60 -- don't used
$c0 02 id number for size 160 x 120 -- used
$c0 03 id number for size 320 x 240 -- don't used
$c0 04 id number for size 640 x 480 -- used
$c0 05 id number for size 1280x 960 -- don't used
$c0 06 id number for size 1600x1200 -- don't used
$c0 07 id number for size 1632x1088 -- don't used
$c0 08 id number for size 1632x1224 -- used
|
|
Thank you very much. I wanted to ask about this:-) Another question about camdriver: Is it possible to force MXE-60 to flash even in good light conditions?
|
|
If someone could fix this I would be so gratefull!! If the flash is on th phone, I want it to flash. If I don't want tu use it I just take it of ... |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
what is meaning the difference between this
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END; (by russian man)
and this
seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0a $b0 00 5 3 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END; (by erzan -before to modify)
what they do actually and why the first one is right...i know is something with macro...but what exactly,please somebody! |
macgywer
Joined: Jun 11, 2006
Posts: 13
From: Croatia
PM |
i've been on vication for a week and took the 3.1 with me. i took around 200 pics. the camera crashed once or twice but i think that's ok for that amount of shots.
http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/3184/upload1oo4.jpg
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/9521/upload2wx1.jpg
http://img445.imageshack.us/img445/2750/upload3cb9.jpg
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/1406/upload4ej4.jpg
http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/8554/upload5od5.jpg
feedback on the pics?
great work e man! can't wait to test the latest version of 3.1 |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
waaaaaaaaaaa,this is super ,really great ...because of this i love also 3.1 from e man....and i still don't know why eman changed the ,,seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END; (by russian man),, with the old setting was also ok...like in this picture the macro is great! |
aabg
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 206
PM |
hi everyone, i been testing 3.1 last driver from e man, and i should say i have many problems to take pictures in nightmode
1)first, the camara cant focus, or it cost to do it
2) in one ocasion when it took the picture in the dark, the camera exit
3) it seems its more dificult to take pictures in macro mode
firm: R1BD001
sorry about my english, i donīt practice it too much |
ToryXX
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 495
From: Germany
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 23:23:36, aabg wrote:
hi everyone, i been testing 3.1 last driver from e man, and i should say i have many problems to take pictures in nightmode
1)first, the camara cant focus, or it cost to do it
2) in one ocasion when it took the picture in the dark, the camera exit
3) it seems its more dificult to take pictures in macro mode
firm: R1BD001
sorry about my english, i donīt practice it too much
|
|
well i don't know why i don't have this problems ...maybe because also i have r1bc w800i...and till now i have no problems with this driver ...but the thing with taking time ,and focus in the night ,very hard was yesterday with the 5.5a  |
Jemp
Joined: Jul 09, 2005
Posts: 39
From:
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-02 02:13:45, max_wedge wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-10-01 20:39:12, Jemp wrote:
I've been testing the deiferent Hibryd Camdrivers, then tried 5.3 and 4.5 versions and found that the 4.5 original is the best you can use, the hybrid camdrivers need more control in Sharpness and Exposition. The firmware I use is R1BD001 and 4.5 driver works better than the Hybrid, so you must work as hard as possible to reach the perfection!
PD: For me 5.3 original Sks 
|
|
can you please post some pics that show that? I've read and viewed every page on this thread, and for thelife of me cannot see any reason to say that the 2.441 (or most of the drivers in fact) have sharpness issues. Infact on many pics that aren't sharp, other people with the same camdriver do produce sharp pics, so I can only conclude the sharpness issue is related to photo taking skills and not the camdriver.
I have had ZERO issues with sharpness from 2.441 or most of the recent drivers.
On the issue of crashing, it's interesting what Andeo says, but again I've not had crashing issues? I have been testing predominately on W800 R1BC002 and haven't had camera crash since the Media Player skins hack(which I no longer use). I've used mostly the aksd drivers, but also 5.6 (which i suspect was based on the 4.5?), so maybe that explains my lack of crashing.
|
|
The only problem is that I've tested diferent scenes whith te dieferent ddrivers, but they had very general defects, for example, 5.3 had the problem that took photos with a marker color of the main light, so no real colors reached.... 9.9 was very fast to focus, but... it's focus was a bit imprecise..., 2.441: I didn't like it's night mode and the sharpness was not enough for me, then all erzan's drivers had too the problem of sharpness.... Y tested an edited 5.3 driver which was the best, but...... crashes a lot, it sent me to de main menu when I tried to take a photo...
But there's something courious... I have seen very good photos with 5.3 driver, but only from K750 phones (I use a W800i) I think it's because of the combination FW - Camera Driver...
Y hope find some better driver for mi R1BD001 firmware in my W800i, for now using the original 4.5 Driver which handles the light very well, it only delays a bit to focus a macro, but focuses very good! |
ilabstudios
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW
|
@ap0lo
I'm using R1bC002 for W800i. Which f/w should I be using to use 5.5 then :S
5.5a seems to work fine on my f/w
3.1 seems wicked aswell..
 k750 r1ca021/w800 r1bc002|2gb msdp|menu tweak|new displaydriver/e_erzan 5.6c camdriver|w810 acoustics|playlist|no sim setup|blutooth patch|remove keylock/nosound/volume msg and many more http://filelodge.bolt.com/profile/ilabstudios |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
i have a suggestion for force flashing MXE-60... since its an add-on to the K750, it must have some kind of sensors to distinguish lighting conditions aite?
what if, we block this sensors like with some objects (paper, tape, or our finger) to let it know that the environment is freakin pitch black... i dont have an MXE (what a pity) so i havent tried that technique yet.. for those who have..
are you sure you have tried tricking the sensors?
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..." |
|
|
Posted: 2006-10-02 18:29
k750 r1ca021/w800 r1bc002|2gb msdp|menu tweak|new displaydriver/e_erzan 5.6c camdriver|w810 acoustics|playlist|no sim setup|blutooth patch|remove keylock/nosound/volume msg and many more 
