| Author |
Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 |
sxa
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Posts: 25
From: China
PM |
@Kriomag
Can you tell me how to change the jpeg compression in your 21.9 and 21.91,thanks. |
|
|
cuckoo
Joined: Mar 27, 2007
Posts: 38
PM |
my english is poor,so i can't think i speak well.
about foucs,bofore foucs and after foucs,the mobile-phone displayers differently!
eg;get white/get yellow,look like some question.
hoho,sorry for my ENGLISH |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
New beta camdiver from me: 1.3 beta 2
Changes:
1. In supermode there is saturation instead of scenes (EV +2.0). Zoom 1.0 - default, 1.1 - desaturated (BW) - 4.0 very saturated.
2. By the default driver makes a pictures a little bit more saturated. You can change this in config via DF_SATURATION (this must be 00 if you want to get the default saturation of the original driver).
Links:
http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver_spu_1_3_b2.rar
and
http://nwamdclub.nktb-kristall.ru/camdriver0.dat
[ This Message was edited by: SPU on 2007-05-12 09:11 ] |
mirage_bgnow
Joined: Apr 01, 2007
Posts: 56
PM |
I think the Sarmat 4.81 is maybe the best driver for W810, but I think too that it's overexposure in some cases, especially when the sky is very blue, on pictures is white...on that picture:
Here're ok..:
ant maybe it's my opinion, but it seems that driver have a little bit of more noise compared to Kriomag's when the places are more darkness...I don't know...
[ This Message was edited by: mirage_bgnow on 2007-05-12 09:58 ] |
radicalgel
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 98
PM, WWW
|
@kriomag
Hey have you had a look at the pics I posted?.. Just wanted to know why you reduced the JPEG compression from 89% to 85%.
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/radicalgel/ |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
@radicalgel
21.91 = compression 87% but it's max value and this mean that phone can save at lower value (even 75%). and by the way... 87% is perfect value, why increase if you don't see any differences? for bigger file size?
|
Aur3LiaN
Joined: Feb 21, 2007
Posts: 19
PM |
@sarmad
Can you make 21.91 based on 4.5? in 5.7.  |
kukuh
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
Posts: 53
From: Indonesia
PM |
don't know why. Vivid give me strange color in outdoor picture.
i think SPU's macro stlye is good.i agree with it.
|
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
Raiderski
If you don't see the difference i recommend you to change your monitor 
kukuh
I have the same phone with the same firmware and i don't see any strange colors... my be they seems to be a liitle bit too vivid, but they are true. |
hellvy
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 42
PM |
On 2007-05-12 08:24:14, kopritis wrote:
On 2007-05-12 07:55:18, hellvy wrote:
@kopritis
Can you tell me how to increase shutter speed in your k800 mod driver when macro is on ? The pictures took with EM is very clear but still long enough for me to get blur picture -_-' I think i'll try to change its value to fit my need. If you can tell me where to change it, thank you.
[ This Message was edited by: hellvy on 2007-05-12 06:55 ]
open the camdrivers and find this line " $s0 3B $-0 r1" in the "EN" , "ENM"
just replace the " 3b" with the " 30"
example: " $s0 30 $-0 r1 "
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-05-12 07:26 ]
Well, i've check your driver. But i can't find EN and ENM section, just LedEM and FENM. And '$s0 3a $-0 r1' instead of '$s0 3b $-0 r1'. Which one i have to change?
[ This Message was edited by: hellvy on 2007-05-12 15:44 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
@SPU
let's say honestly, we take photos using 2mpx with limited capabilities and not with professional camera. should we be angry because of the small granulosis and artefacts visible at zoom x6 when decreasing compression level from 90% to 87%? i think not because of 3 reasons:
1. 90% in some situation/model/firmware can be unstable
2. go many pages ago - many peoples did not notice the difference between 89% and 75% (called auto) compression
3. declared in driver compression value with 07 02 00 13 $w2 $w2 $w2 when register2 = 0x5C doesn't mean that you exactly such value of the compression obtain. phone software has some kind of behaviour which check that desired value can be reached with the correct border size of the file without crash. result is one - you can get various value even 75% at this same driver!
i can easily prove that on driver with declared 87% i took picture at 95% and 76%.
so... should we consider the matter of the compression? i think this is useless
for everyone interested: very nice JPEG examiner...
http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/jpeg-snoop.html
quantization table marker is the most interesting thing...
_________________
http://picasaweb.google.com/raiderski
W800 R1BD001
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-05-12 15:47 ] |
ATancevski
Joined: Apr 06, 2007
Posts: 4
PM |
Hi, guys some pics from Sarmad's 5.6 (optimized for W810) Spot ver. driver taken with my w810i cid49 FW: R4EA031, and comments!
First of all this is my first post on this thread, and keep it alive:-)
1. cc: off(NORMAL), WB: Daylight, EV+0.0, macro: 1.0 Auto
comment: Nice vivid colors compared to next 6, cc off is way better for me(green is green not dark mood green).
2. cc: off(NORMAL), WB: Daylight, EV+0.33, macro: 1.0 Auto
comment: Little overexposed(EV+0.33), thus little blur is present, color is nice.
3. cc: off(NORMAL), WB: Daylight, EV+0.33, macro: 1.0 Auto
comment: Little overexposed too, colors are little bit lifeless.
4. cc: off(NORMAL), WB: Daylight, EV+0.33, macro: 1.2 - 4.0 Manual
comment: Colors are stone dead, more exposure needed(my mistake )
5. cc: off(NORMAL), WB: Daylight, EV+0.33, macro: 1.2 - 4.0 Manual
comment: Nice vivid colors, overexposed a little bit.
6. cc: off(NORMAL), WB: Auto, EV+0.00, 1.2 - 4.0 Manual
comment: Fine colors, good exposure.
7. cc: on(FINE), WB: Auto, EV+0.00, macro: 1.0 Auto
comment: CC is on extremely moody green, + WB auto too dark(my opinion)
Sarmad's 5.6 is better than stock 4.5, but i get dead and moody colors, i guess i will try Kriomag's to see the difference cuz i like more rich colors. Any suggestions to which driver is more suitable for me or some shooting techniques on how to make my pics look better, are welcomed. And we must stop arguing about strange colors because we all have different eyes  , and all have different monitors(Mine is Samsung 959NF cable: BNC)!
P.S: We must make complete user manual with example shots and instructions in .pdf or something for all known drivers. Bye!
[ This Message was edited by: ATancevski on 2007-05-12 16:35 ] |
deadball
Joined: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 20
PM |
@KRIOMAG
when will you add the ISO mode in ur cam driver???
sorry for my bad english
oi.... ada org indo lg ga neh??? |
fezzo
Joined: Apr 01, 2007
Posts: 20
PM |
@deadball
hadiiiiiiiiiiirrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....................  |
AcidSouL
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
Posts: 18
PM |
On 2007-05-12 11:30:26, Aur3LiaN wrote:
@sarmad
Can you make 21.91 based on 4.5? in 5.7.
or Kriomag to find w810 and test with him |
|
|
Posted: 2007-05-12 09:22
800i CID36 R1BC002
