| Author |
Modded Camera Driver for k800i/k810i |
dEaD-nErVe
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 43
PM |
Here U Go [c3] Thanks To Kriptos
http://www.4shared.com/file/23335320/e4adbb02/27camdriver0.html |
|
|
mongoose3800
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 416
From: Australia
PM |
On 2007-09-01 15:18:51, dEaD-nErVe wrote:
Okay m8s Here is my B4& After Shots With kopritis Carnera Drivers 2.7, And 2.8
But 1st The Orignal Shot
Modded 2.7 Driver
Modded 2.8 Driver
original size download:
http://www.4shared.com/file/23332009/30d6e7c4/B4After.html
think 2.7 stands out more.... Wat do yall think ???
[ This Message was edited by: dEaD-nErVe on 2007-09-01 14:22 ]
Sorry, I don't see any real improvement apart from maybe some more sharpness. It's too hard to tell as the 3 photo's are at different angles and probably lighting conditions. BTW, download the full size images and view them at full size and you'll see Jaggies all over the leaves of the palm tree in all three shots. Zoom in and you'll see they are everywhere. I'm pretty sure palm trees don't come with zig-zag leaves. Thanks kopritis for providing an image that demonstrates the jaggies in a K800 image. See, it's not just my K800. The K800 camera sucks.
I actually did some sample shots today with my very old fixed focus 1mp camera and it doesn't suffer jaggies at all. In fact it's 1mp images are superior and you can zoom in them far more than a K800 3mp image. The K800 camera is a joke - it's a gimic that fails to deliver on it claims of being a true digicam. Don't get me wrong here either, from what I've seen the N73 isn't any better - but it doesn't suffer the jaggies.
I'm still to see any driver that offers any real improvement. As far as I'm concerned the K800's 2mp images are better if you've modded the driver to increase their max file size and compression. |
[c3]
Joined: Aug 18, 2004
Posts: 181
From: Kuwait
PM |
thanks for the link. Do u know if it has the 2mp mod? the one mongoos is talking about? and does it do video at 30 fps?
thanks |
mongoose3800
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 416
From: Australia
PM |
Hey everyone, if you're going to post modded drivers can you be a little more professional and update the comments in the driver as well. It sucks to look through a driver and see the original comment about a setting only to find it has been changed by someone who couldn't be bothered updating the comment. Not only is it lazy, it makes it very hard for others to see what settings are being used. Therefore, making it harder for others to possibly improve. |
[c3]
Joined: Aug 18, 2004
Posts: 181
From: Kuwait
PM |
Nice. i was just thinking about that. its like u've read my mind!
|
hullabaloo
Joined: Jul 18, 2006
Posts: 6
PM |
On 2007-09-01 15:17:23, TheNerd wrote:
options? I dont think there are any,just point and shoot.
Ok, I thought there would be some kind of ISO settings. I should have read better the whole topic...
Now another question that [c3] is asking too : What version of this camera driver supports the 30fps video recording ? |
Mike2
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Posts: 322
From: Thessaloniki, Greece
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-09-01 16:49:46, mongoose3800 wrote:
Hey everyone, if you're going to post modded drivers can you be a little more professional and update the comments in the driver as well. It sucks to look through a driver and see the original comment about a setting only to find it has been changed by someone who couldn't be bothered updating the comment. Not only is it lazy, it makes it very hard for others to see what settings are being used. Therefore, making it harder for others to possibly improve.
In case someone doesn't change the comments, just use ExamDiff to find the differences between the original camera driver and the modded one  |
mongoose3800
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 416
From: Australia
PM |
On 2007-09-01 17:29:07, hullabaloo wrote:
On 2007-09-01 15:17:23, TheNerd wrote:
options? I dont think there are any,just point and shoot.
Ok, I thought there would be some kind of ISO settings. I should have read better the whole topic...
Now another question that [c3] is asking too : What version of this camera driver supports the 30fps video recording ?
I've got no idea as the K800's video ability is crap. Even at 30FPS no one would really give a toss as it is still too small! Really, just give up on it for video - it sucks. |
masada71
Joined: May 16, 2007
Posts: 75
PM |
On 2007-09-01 18:03:46, mongoose3800 wrote:
On 2007-09-01 17:29:07, hullabaloo wrote:
On 2007-09-01 15:17:23, TheNerd wrote:
options? I dont think there are any,just point and shoot.
Ok, I thought there would be some kind of ISO settings. I should have read better the whole topic...
Now another question that [c3] is asking too : What version of this camera driver supports the 30fps video recording ?
I've got no idea as the K800's video ability is crap. Even at 30FPS no one would really give a toss as it is still too small! Really, just give up on it for video - it sucks.
i agree,but i admit that with 2.7 there are some signs of improvement in this particular area of video... |
myk800i
Joined: May 16, 2007
Posts: 24
PM |
does it really make "that much" of a difference? |
masada71
Joined: May 16, 2007
Posts: 75
PM |
On 2007-09-01 18:25:55, myk800i wrote:
does it really make "that much" of a difference?
in terms of quality of k800 video capturing for me,yes..a lot.with less pixels boxes than before and a lot sharpen images than before... |
kopritis
Joined: Mar 11, 2007
Posts: 295
From: Loutsa-Greece
PM |
ok! 30fps video recording for those who is curious.. kopritis 2.9 camdriver
make tests... and then we are talking about my previous post about 30fps video...
I will say't again 30fps video recording is crap!!! make tests to see your self what i say... Start a video rec and make a full zoom...
download link
http://www.megafileupload.com[....]/2-9-30fps-camdriver0-rar.html
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-01 18:47 ]
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-01 19:19 ] |
[c3]
Joined: Aug 18, 2004
Posts: 181
From: Kuwait
PM |
Thanx for the driver big K the video recording is great apart from the zoom issue i dont know if youre aware of it or not? Ill post some pictures with 2.8 and 2.9 of the same object. U cant notice a big difference but it is there 
Here is my 2.8 photo
And this is the 2.9 one
U can see the difference between the two, the noise is till there, but the 2.9 one looks sharper.
thanks kopritis
|
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
good job kopritis. Did you tested the 20-25FPS video? does it crash? Yes the videos are small, but they look "good" on the phone in fullscreen. |
vegetaleb
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lebanon
PM |
photos taken by 2.8:
MIAOUUUU
_________________
Prince Vegeta,prince of all sayans 
[ This Message was edited by: vegetaleb on 2007-09-01 19:45 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-09-01 16:28
