| Author |
Sony Ericsson Announces W950i 3G Walkman Phone |
ares
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_w950-review-111p5.php
SE w880 + Iphone 4 16gb |
|
|
litepurple
Joined: Jan 15, 2002
Posts: 82
From: Mark
PM |
There was a large cover add (back and front) of London's thelondonpaper last night in conjunction with Orange. It was to advertise SE's Walkman phones. On there were the W850, W950 and W810 white. The W950 was shown as 'new' not 'coming soon' so they must be gearing up for release very shortly. |
mjaniszewski
Joined: Oct 08, 2006
Posts: 37
PM |
litepurple, could you possibly scan the cover?
|
litepurple
Joined: Jan 15, 2002
Posts: 82
From: Mark
PM |
Unfortunately, I left it on the tube.
But it did refer to the W850 and W950 as being new.
It also pointed readers to www.orange.co.uk/walkmanphones
It looks like Orange has some kind of promo deal with SE. |
yuunanase
Joined: Sep 30, 2006
Posts: 291
From: utopia
PM, WWW
|
Why on earth are stylus so expensive?
And why have they already released the stylus, but not the phone? |
mjaniszewski
Joined: Oct 08, 2006
Posts: 37
PM |
omg, the info at this site: http://shop.orange.co.uk/shop[....]t/sony_ericsson_w950i/features reads "Orange Music Player"
why would they do that to such a perfect mobile?
i hate orange for their branding. they would probably stick their logo to the handset as well as prevent user from changing web settings. arghh...
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: mjaniszewski on 2006-10-18 21:14 ] |
Tiny
Joined: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 165
PM |
nice phone but why no cam  owell, I've seen this phone on display, pretty nice but the touch screen would annoy me |
OfficeMaven
Joined: Jul 26, 2005
Posts: 182
PM |
I personally LOVE the touch screen on the W950 and have absolutely no need whatsoever for a camera on my phones (and so I'm quite glad that it doesn't have one). I've yet to see a camera on any mobile phone that was worth having. They all take horrible quality pics when compared to even the cheapest of stand-alone digital cameras and they're just plain unusable in low light situations. |
|
|
Posted: 2006-10-16 15:17
