| Author |
Samsung cellphones sucks!;-) |
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
@govigov: Quite agree. I consider series60 phones as "toy Symbian" devices. Their productive functional capabilities vis-a-vis UIQ/communicator is miles behind. Anyone who uses a P-series like he would a regular phone ought to be shot (not literally :)
This message was posted from a P800 |
|
|
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
How about the Samsung phones on Symbian? Those should have some of the advanced functionality some of us are used to? I've also heard a few good comments about the D500.
This message was posted from a P800 |
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
for samsung, symbain is a like a taboo. they will always make custom built software for exclusive use in their phones. and they suck at making that software.
|
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
An annoying thing is: ou cant send/receive ringtones/images via IrDA; all MMS I sent out arrived on other phones with audio & graphics not showing. I am beginning to think that aliens create Sams' software. Proprietory crap!
This message was posted from a P800 |
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
Or they are plain stupid.
This message was posted from a K500 |
Geezay
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
Posts: 323
From: Harare, Zimbabwe
PM |
@ ThreeX, you got it right! Nokia's 2110 from way back and their 6100 have basically the same menu, just added a colour screen and poly rings!
Samsungs have great displays and great tones, not forgetting interesting designs but that's about it. They have very few phones with both bluetooth and infrared, basically their connectivity is whack! tried sharing tones and photos with a few, and gave up!
If it is to be it is up to me! |
Rookwise
Joined: Mar 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK. Phone:Samsung Galaxy A54 5
PM |
Looks like all thats changing now though. I would have agreed straight away if this thread were started last year before I bought a D500. Tis a great phone.
This message was posted from a S700 |
sylvester
Joined: Mar 05, 2002
Posts: 78
From: Athens ,Greece
PM |
The only good thing in samsung's phones is the desing... |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
You mean design? I have the look of samsung phones. They look terrible with that protruding external antennae on almost all models'
This message was posted from a T230 |
sycoskids
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: 1
From: South Wales
PM |
Too right! Shite features and they like to crash! Long live SE
This message was posted from a T610 |
govigov
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Back home - Cochin
PM |
hey the d500 doent have antennae, and in black it looks  sexy.
|
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
I said "almost all" govi. Not all.
This message was posted from a T230 |
RicK700i
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Posts: 385
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
So how does the D500 compares with the S700i?
This message was posted from a T300 |
whizkidd
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
|
I said "almost all" govi. Not all.
This message was posted from a T230 |
OluYom
Joined: Oct 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Nigeria
PM, WWW
|
Like I said earlier, I've heard a few good things about the D500. I am not a Samsung hater. If they are changing, let's give them some credit, guys - same as I hear Moto's sacked the aliens that used to work in their software R&D 
PS: I used to be known as AYA |
|
|
Posted: 2005-01-10 23:57
