| Author |
Dont try this at your own (kids) :-) |
Perran
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 48
From: Stockholm/Sweden
PM |
Did you even bother to read through the (rather old) thread??? It clearly states that there's no way to send the pictures over by cable.
//Perran
[ This Message was edited by: Perran on 2003-02-25 13:09 ] |
|
|
funlovinkrim
Joined: Dec 03, 2002
Posts: 33
From: Scotland
PM |
i thought they may of brought out a new program for it  |
dadickin
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Posts: 26
From: Bristol, UK
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-05-31 13:06, badger wrote:
So the MCA-20 is the same spec but 4 times the price.
I can't understand why it is so expensive.
|
|
Well, those little cameras that are cheaper would require you to take a laptop or PDA everywhere with you in order to transfer the picture from the camera to the phone.
Don't take me wrong, mind, I personally thing the camera is not value fr money - the pics are poo, and it costs a lot? - only advantage is if you do see something funny, you can snap it and MMS it to a mate, all in a matter of minutes. - much quicker than taking a superior picture on the little camera, transfering it to PDA/Laptop with USB cable, and then transferring it agin via IR to phone, and THEN sending it.
Camera is too dear - I got mine free (MCA-20) - I would NOT buy it - not at current price |
funlovinkrim
Joined: Dec 03, 2002
Posts: 33
From: Scotland
PM |
i actually agree there i wouldnt of actually bought the cam but as a free bee they are kewl and pics are good as long as u have it on high quality but then i found that most hight quality pics are actually to big to mms grrrrrrrrr...... which is a shame because id really like to take good quality pics and send them to email addies of friends via mms |
|
|
Posted: 2003-02-25 14:07
