| Author |
7250 vs T610 |
MeSang
Joined: Apr 26, 2003
Posts: 76
From: Holland
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-05-02 17:26, mag86 wrote:
A friend of mine just got a 7250. I told him to wait for the t610 but he will only buy nokia. I got a god look at the phone, and it really disappoint me. Sure, it got 5mb, but when you can't use picture phonebook or send pictures to your friends with IR, then you really don't need 5mb. I am going to buy a t610 as soon as its on the market, and I would choose it over the 7250 even if they had the same price.
|
|
If you got a 7250 you DO need 5 MB memory, why?
BECAUSE! if you cant send your files via MMS of Irda, you'll have to wait for a solution, and knowing Nokia, you'll have to wait a while, but you still want to make Photo's so you store them  |
|
|
dimitrivd
Joined: Apr 15, 2002
Posts: 298
From: Belgium (Lokeren)
PM, WWW
|
SE need to build a mermory-stick reader 4 his phones. (compatible with T610, T310, T68i, ...) I use my MCA-20 as wallpaper-saver sometimes. You can store a lot of wallpapers that way for your T68i. It is still a litle bit faster and cheaper then storing them on a wap site lik esato |
mag86
Joined: Apr 12, 2003
Posts: 31
PM |
@MeSang
Very god point. |
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Picture this, you're about to get a new laptop. Now, you have set yourself up on two different ones, it's going to be one of them.
Both are about the same price. The main diff is that one has a 15" 32bit screen, 10GB harddisk and 256MB RAM, the other one has a 14" 24bit screen, 30GB harddisk and 512MB RAM, now which one is it gonna be?
Edit:
I do believe that Nokia's pc-suite works for transfering photos back and forth between your phone and pc.
[ This Message was edited by: Froddan on 2003-05-02 19:06 ] |
ShawnCarter
Joined: Mar 30, 2003
Posts: 23
From: The Netherlands
PM |
i also was like , Shit only 2 mb. But after really good thinkin i found it enough. Ill explain why.
1. Lets say you keep 1 Mb for foto`s. Thats high quality pictures of 20Kb. 1 Mb = 50 times 20 kb. So 50 pictures. Man please how many fotos do you want to save in youre Phone. Because most fotos are being put on the Pc and then deleted of the phone. so are y`all with me: 50 foto`s is enough.
2. then you have still 1 mb free. Lets say that the Se has his own programs that take .5 mb. Because you also put names in the phone book Etc. So that leaves .5 mb over. I realy dont know how much a mophun game takes. But lets say like 50 kb. Thats fair i think. Wel that are 10 games. And i dont think that anybody will put 10 games on it. because you normally have 4 or 5 games. so in my opinion. 2 mb isnt much but Enough. So all the advantages are way bigger then this minor of the T610.
|
vampyriaerotica
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: 341
From: MYS > London, UK
PM |
Seth
This message was posted from a T68i |
Rashkae
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
@XsuwailX: Wala kang alam!
Nokia is not "forward-thinking". Nokia is an IMITATOR, not an INNOVATOR. They are REMOVING connectivity options from their phones instead of adding them. You think Nokia has "mastered" on-screen display? Hell no! Pictures taken from a 7650 loog great on screen, but they look LOUSY when on the PC. In other words, the 7650 fooled you.
The T610 has a very, very nice screen that displays pictures correctly. So does the P800.
You obviously don't know what you are talking about. |
vampyriaerotica
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: 341
From: MYS > London, UK
PM |
Conclusion is T610 lack of the sexy curve 7250 have and 7250 lack of the functionality T610 have! It's a matter of whether you prefer look nor brain!
This message was posted from a T68i |
Rashkae
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
@vampyriaerotica: That's always the issue, isn't it? 
SE: functionality (hence the choice of business-users)
Nokia: Looks (hence the choice of fashion-victims) |
randomix
Joined: Apr 29, 2003
Posts: 122
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-05-02 20:30, vampyriaerotica wrote:
Conclusion is T610 lack of the sexy curve 7250 have and 7250 lack of the functionality T610 have! It's a matter of whether you prefer look nor brain!
|
|
Oh man ! "the sexy curve 7250 have", Pfffffff
the "curve" of 7250 is more like a shaver than anything.. |
ppcrockar
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-05-02 20:01, Froddan wrote:
Picture this, you're about to get a new laptop. Now, you have set yourself up on two different ones, it's going to be one of them.
Both are about the same price. The main diff is that one has a 15" 32bit screen, 10GB harddisk and 256MB RAM, the other one has a 14" 24bit screen, 30GB harddisk and 512MB RAM, now which one is it gonna be?
|
|
That's not the same thing.. The differnce between 24bit and 32bit isn't noticable. But there is a huge difference between 4096 colours and 65536 colours.
And it's not only the colours, but also the resolution and the screens "speed". There are no "shadows" and other STN problems visible on the T610 while this are very visible on the Nokia 4096 colour screens. I've tested both phones and I can tell you that difference is huge.
Edit:
Quote:
|
I do believe that Nokia's pc-suite works for transfering photos back and forth between your phone and pc.
|
|
Yes, but that is kind of crippled isn't it. You'll have to have the Nokia software installed on every PC that you would like to transfer the picture to. With the T610 you just need a computer with an IR-port or bluetooth (or any other device with bluetooth/IR) and you can transfer the image.
@XsuwailX
Master of on screen quality.. you got to be kidding. My guess is that you have never seen the T610 screen. The T610's screen is far superior to the Nokia 7250 screen. As I said before the difference between 4096 colours and 65536 colours is very large. While 4096 colours might be ok for "comics" and "clipart" images it doesn't stand a chance when it comes to displaying photos.
[ This Message was edited by: ppcrockar on 2003-05-02 20:51 ] |
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Since I haven't tested either one of them, I can't argue on that.
What I'd like to know is, if it was Motorola, Samsung, Siemens or Nokia that would be bringing out the T610, wouldn't many of you guys trash it because of the lack of memory?
Yea, sending pics from a 7250 to a pc requires the installation of the pc-suite. But then again, how many desktops have built in IR or BT?
Kinda the same prob. |
XsuwailX
Joined: Dec 26, 2002
Posts: 103
PM |
Hehe! Im beginning 2 enjoy this!
@rashkae, INAMO! ANG KULIT MO! BOBO KA BA? Compare d on screen quality of a nokia and a T610, you'll see w/c one is better! Dnt use that damn PC! If u dnt agree, meet me anywhere in manila 2 see on the spot! il hit ur head w/ a baseball bat if u stil insist that T610 is beter in terms of ON SCREEN PCTRE QUALTY! seryoso ko, kininginamo!
This message was posted from a T68i |
randomix
Joined: Apr 29, 2003
Posts: 122
PM |
Quote:
|
But then again, how many desktops have built in IR or BT?
Kinda the same prob.
|
|
But most of the NoteBooks have built in IR and some of them with BT |
ppcrockar
Joined: Mar 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
@ XsuwailX
If you compare the on-screen picture quality of the T610 and the Nokia 7250, and you insist that the Nokia has better quality, then you need to have your eyes checked or something.
@ randomix
Exactly.. almost all notebooks has IR (and some have bluetooth). Also some new motherboards for desktop PC's has built-in bluetooth. It's more likely that you'll find a computer with an IR port than a computer with the Nokia Software on it. Besides we are not just talking about computers. Look at all thoose PDA's that have IR-ports and other phones with IR-ports.
Why have Nokia crippled the phone by not letting people send images from the phone to another IR device. I mean if you have an IR-port with minimize its usefullness.
[ This Message was edited by: ppcrockar on 2003-05-03 09:31 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2003-05-02 19:48
